mug said:It's definitely a fat mother****er. However, I'm liking it. I'm pretty sure it doesn't produce 720p (although it claims otherwise). The picture had a bit of overscan however nothing that couldn't easily be fixed within the service menu.
Safe Bet said:A 720p CRT ~$400?
*ponder*
It accpets 720p but doesn't display it at 720p?jjasper said:It isn't 720p it just accepts it.
Safe Bet said:?
But doesn't display it at 720p?
Safe Bet said:It accpets 720p but doesn't display it at 720p?
Chris_C said:Most CRT's accept 720p and upscale to 1080i.
Shogmaster said:Now some TVs take 720p signal, side scales it into 1080i before scaling that down to a resolution that the TV's tube can resolve (into 960x540 or something) if that's what you mean...
nataku said:So... what size TV do you actually need to get the full, 720p res? How about 1080p?
HDTVs are way too confusing. Too much crappy info out there.
Chris_C said:I expect so, I'm not an AV nut, just tried to do a little research before purchasing my set. However I must admit I never knew most CRT's didn't actually display a true 1080i signal. Now I feel cheated.
chinmonster said:Anyone have that first mini-19-inch Sammy that is willing to take some real pics? I kind of want to see some gaming on it, since I'm thinking about taking the plunge in addition to my 32'' Sammy LCD.
Awesome.sorryaboutdresden said:I'm getting it very soon because of this thread. When I finally get my hands on it I'll be sure to take a bunch of pictures of it running my 360.
Grayman said:Are there cheapo monitors that do 1080p and have hdmi?
rjcc said:this odd "don't get crt's, they aren't as good as 720p" argument is obviously coming from people who've read a spec sheet and think they know what the deal is.
at whatever size you're talking about, CRTs can have the best picture quality, without the contrast issues of lcds.
actually go out and look at the TVs. If you're buying 34-inch or below, a CRT is a perfectly good option if you can find a good one.
Shogmaster said:Unfortunately, they are all pretty much now 1366x768 instead of 1280x720 (with 1920x1080 for the high end). 720p signals will suffer from a slight upscaling on the 1366x768 sets.
*Anything over 1280x720.
jvalioli said:Should I get the 19" Samsung posted early ( http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16824001073 ) or should I spend more and get this 23" Samsung ( http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16889102055 ). I'd be using it for TV, Wii, 360 and probably the PS3 aswell and it would go in a (smallish) bedroom.
Jefklak said:Woah second one looks nice. Too bad for the resolution tough.
Let me see some prices on that one...
Sorry that I missed this question last night, but its on the left side of the thing (not in the shot), it has that, an earphone socket and s-video.Jefklak said:Sorry for this dumb question, but composite is W- R (stereo) - Yellow (video input)
where's the last input on this picture? All i can see is White, Red and the component (RGB) ones.
Xdrive05 said:Hey guys, I need some help. I'm looking for an economical HDtv within the next couple months, since I'm buying a Wii. I know the Wii doesn't do 720p, but that's really what I'm after. Here's the deal:
- 720p (but I would take that 768 resolution if I had to)
- 16:9
- over 23" if possible
- headphone jack (I play console games with these in my room)
- sub $400 (or not much over)
Is there anything out there that's like this? That Sammy from a couple pages back would be perfect except I really want something with a little larger screen size, since I'll be sitting about 8 to 10 feet away from it.
Also, I'd take a CRT if I had to, but I'm really just looking for the absolute best my little budget will buy. Bulkiness or looks DOES NOT MATTER, just as long as it works as advertised.
I really appreciate whatever help you folks can offer. Thanks.
EDIT: I live in the US, btw. Thanks again.
Unless it's a used/refurbished model, the only way you'll get that size/specs with that price is if you find some kind of in-store open box deal. Then you might be able to haggle the price down. Either that or go with an older model CRT which is definitely not recommended.Xdrive05 said:Hey guys, I need some help. I'm looking for an economical HDtv within the next couple months, since I'm buying a Wii. I know the Wii doesn't do 720p, but that's really what I'm after. Here's the deal:
- 720p (but I would take that 768 resolution if I had to)
- 16:9
- over 23" if possible
- headphone jack (I play console games with these in my room)
- sub $400 (or not much over)
Is there anything out there that's like this? That Sammy from a couple pages back would be perfect except I really want something with a little larger screen size, since I'll be sitting about 8 to 10 feet away from it.
Also, I'd take a CRT if I had to, but I'm really just looking for the absolute best my little budget will buy. Bulkiness or looks DOES NOT MATTER, just as long as it works as advertised.
I really appreciate whatever help you folks can offer. Thanks.
EDIT: I live in the US, btw. Thanks again.
Farore said:Why do companies choose 1366x768 instead of 1280x720 (I asked this question in another thread, but no one answered)? Is there a technical reason? Why not make 720 the standard?
Second, is the upscaling to 1366x768 very noticeable?
Heezzi said:SAMSUNG 940MW-SV Silver 19" 8ms Widescreen LCD Monitor with TV Tuner 300 cd/m2 700:1 Built in Speakers 0.294mm Pixel Pitch
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16824001073
$329, $299 with mail-in rebate.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Mine too. Something to point out about this set is that it only displays in 1080i, though. I'm still unsure as to what set exactly I will be purchasing soon, but I'm pretty sure I want one with a 480p mode for best image quality of current (and Wii) stuff.Stin said:They have this Sanyo 30" HDTV crt at my local Walmart for about $470.
http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.gsp?product_id=2601425
Jefklak already told you to get it, so I didn't think you needed more input.ElyrionX said:Ummm, so no one has any comments on the Samsung model I posted above?
Please?
No way, anything under 12ms is good. You'll only really have ghosting if it's above 12... and you'll only see if at 12 if you're sensitive to it.MoxManiac said:Isn't 8ms too slow for gaming??
raYne said:Jefklak already told you to get it, so I didn't think you needed more input.![]()
You should be able to get it for well under $900, so it's a great deal if you do. 2 HDMI, 1 component, VGA, headphone jack, 2 RF inputs (though you probably won't make use of 'em) optical out (great bonus!) etc. Great contrast ratio, response time and standardized resolution as well (which will reduced any needed scaling).
Go for it.
No way, anything under 12ms is good. You'll only really have ghosting if it's above 12... and you'll only see if at 12 if you're sensitive to it.
You're good to go at 8ms.
I only meant that the previous tvs/monitors in the thread have a standard resolution that's above the norm. So they'd have to do more scaling of the images.ElyrionX said:What do you mean when you refer to "standard resolution" that will reduce any needed scaling?
I'm actually kind of worried that if I were to connect my PS2 on composite (I don't have the S-video or component cables and those are hard to find these days) on this new TV, the graphics would turn out to be too painful to look at.
ElyrionX said:I'm actually kind of worried that if I were to connect my PS2 on composite (I don't have the S-video or component cables and those are hard to find these days) on this new TV, the graphics would turn out to be too painful to look at.
raYne said:I only meant that the previous tvs/monitors in the thread have a standard resolution that's above the norm. So they'd have to do more scaling of the images.
This one is in line with the norm, so in comparison with the others it'll need to do far less, if any, depending on the source.
Composite is an issue though... you really shouldn't be using composite on an LCD at all. If you're only playing your PS2 on it and won't be getting into next-gen soon I'd wait on the purchase. At least then you can find it even cheaper.
gkrykewy said:Yes, that would be stupid. Get a cheap generic component cable on eBay (Such as this one).
Dural said:I believe it is because it is cheaper and easier for them to manufacture due to 1366x768 just being a wider 1024x768 panel.