cheap HDtv

It's definitely a fat mother****er. However, I'm liking it. I'm pretty sure it doesn't produce 720p (although it claims otherwise). The picture had a bit of overscan however nothing that couldn't easily be fixed within the service menu.
 
mug said:
It's definitely a fat mother****er. However, I'm liking it. I'm pretty sure it doesn't produce 720p (although it claims otherwise). The picture had a bit of overscan however nothing that couldn't easily be fixed within the service menu.

There's no way that tube can fully resolve 1280x720 picture. It'll take 720p or 1080i signal and downscale it to fit the tube's resolution (I'm guessing around 800x480).
 
Safe Bet said:
?

But doesn't display it at 720p?

Nope, it just accepts a signal (say if you set the 360 to 720p) and scales it to its own resolution. As shog said I think it is closer to 800x480? Not sure though.
 
Chris_C said:
Most CRT's accept 720p and upscale to 1080i.

That's would be more like side scaling. And if a tube can't fully resolve 1280x720p picture, it certainly ain't gonna do 1920x1080i.

Now some TVs take 720p signal, side scales it into 1080i before scaling that down to a resolution that the TV's tube can resolve (into 960x540 or something) if that's what you mean...
 
So... what size TV do you actually need to get the full, 720p res? How about 1080p?

HDTVs are way too confusing. Too much crappy info out there.
 
Indeed confusing. So when theres a hdtv tuner in the tv does that mean I dont have to pay monthly to watch my tv in hi def?
 
Shogmaster said:
Now some TVs take 720p signal, side scales it into 1080i before scaling that down to a resolution that the TV's tube can resolve (into 960x540 or something) if that's what you mean...

I expect so, I'm not an AV nut, just tried to do a little research before purchasing my set. However I must admit I never knew most CRT's didn't actually display a true 1080i signal. Now I feel cheated.
 
nataku said:
So... what size TV do you actually need to get the full, 720p res? How about 1080p?

HDTVs are way too confusing. Too much crappy info out there.

If you choose direct view LCD TVs, you can get true Hi Def* as small as 17". Direct view CRT HDTVs are problematic since all the models capable of resolving HD resolutions are now all discontinued.

Rear Projection world is where the value lives, but the smallest you can buy is 42".

Thus, the most popular kinds of HDTVs on sale is direct view LCD HDTVs. 27"~32" being the most popular sizes. Unfortunately, they are all pretty much now 1366x768 instead of 1280x720 (with 1920x1080 for the high end). 720p signals will suffer from a slight upscaling on the 1366x768 sets.





*Anything over 1280x720.
 
Chris_C said:
I expect so, I'm not an AV nut, just tried to do a little research before purchasing my set. However I must admit I never knew most CRT's didn't actually display a true 1080i signal. Now I feel cheated.

It's not as bad as you may think. The difference in resolution between 720p and 1080i is extremely noticeable on my set. It's almost too sharp that you start seeing green outlines around red colors. POS CRT.
 
Plus at 26" I really don't notice too much of a difference to be honest. I'm not a HD expert or anything but I'm satisfied with the quality so far. Although I've only experienced GT4 in "1080i" which I shouldn't even use as a test. 480p 16:9 however looks amazing. I'm going to get a 360 soon so hopefully I can see the true quality of the TV.
 
Anyone have that first mini-19-inch Sammy that is willing to take some real pics? I kind of want to see some gaming on it, since I'm thinking about taking the plunge in addition to my 32'' Sammy LCD.
 
chinmonster said:
Anyone have that first mini-19-inch Sammy that is willing to take some real pics? I kind of want to see some gaming on it, since I'm thinking about taking the plunge in addition to my 32'' Sammy LCD.

I'm getting it very soon because of this thread. When I finally get my hands on it I'll be sure to take a bunch of pictures of it running my 360.
 
sorryaboutdresden said:
I'm getting it very soon because of this thread. When I finally get my hands on it I'll be sure to take a bunch of pictures of it running my 360.
Awesome. :)

Also, I have this strange desire to see RE4 PS2 running on it with 16:9 progressive scan, so if you could rawk some pics of that, it'd be faaantastic. :p I'll probably be getting it soon regardless anyway...
 
Just book marking this. I'm up to about 1,800 for my own personal set besides the one my family has, I'd like one myself. However, the cheaper the better guys :)
 
this odd "don't get crt's, they aren't as good as 720p" argument is obviously coming from people who've read a spec sheet and think they know what the deal is.

at whatever size you're talking about, CRTs can have the best picture quality, without the contrast issues of lcds.

actually go out and look at the TVs. If you're buying 34-inch or below, a CRT is a perfectly good option if you can find a good one.
 
rjcc said:
this odd "don't get crt's, they aren't as good as 720p" argument is obviously coming from people who've read a spec sheet and think they know what the deal is.

at whatever size you're talking about, CRTs can have the best picture quality, without the contrast issues of lcds.

actually go out and look at the TVs. If you're buying 34-inch or below, a CRT is a perfectly good option if you can find a good one.

That's not the argument, Junior. We have a 34" Sony CRT HDTV at my house. The argument is that the only CRTs left these days are not high enough in pixel density to do real HD (which is at least 720p). That's all. The prices are good and obviously the black levels can't be beat on them but really, their time in the market is over since all the big boys are shoveling crap to us now (including Sony who's selling us their old mid range tube only now).
 
you can get last years V series Bravia Sets for pretty cheap now.
32inch from $AU2200 (RRP $3999) which is almost a 50% discount, the 26inches would be dirt cheap too.
\Just saying.
 
Shogmaster said:
Unfortunately, they are all pretty much now 1366x768 instead of 1280x720 (with 1920x1080 for the high end). 720p signals will suffer from a slight upscaling on the 1366x768 sets.

*Anything over 1280x720.

Why do companies choose 1366x768 instead of 1280x720 (I asked this question in another thread, but no one answered)? Is there a technical reason? Why not make 720 the standard?

Second, is the upscaling to 1366x768 very noticeable?
 
while we are at it, what do you guys think of this Samsung LE-40 R 73 BD? im planning on buying this baby sometimes in december. it would be nice if somone could give me some feedback on this one?

101 cm Bildschirmdiagonale
- TFT-LCD Display mit Super-PVA-Technologie
- Pictureformat: 16:9
- Resolution: WXGA 1366 x 768
- Brightness: 500cd/m²
- Contrast: 5.000:1
- DNIe (Digital Natural Image Engine)
- 8 ms Responstime
- Viewingangle: h/v 178°/ 178°
- 5 Farbtemperatureinstellungen (Kalt2, Kalt1, Normal, Warm1, Warm2)
- 4 Bildmodi (Dynamisch, Standard, Film, Benutzerdefiniert)
- 4 Bildformate: 16:9, Autobreit, 4:3, Zoom
- Standbildfunktion
- Musikleistung: RMS 2 x 10 Watt
- Nicam/A2 Stereo
- SRS Tru Surround XT
- 5 Tonmodi (Standard, Musik, Film, Sprache, benutzerdefiniert)
- Graphic Equaliser (5 Kanäle)
- automatische Lautstärkeanpassung
- DVB-T Tuner integriert
- HD ready

Anschlüsse :
- Digitaler Bildeingang (HDMI mit HDCP)
- DVI-Audioeingang (Cinch-Anschlüsse)
- Komponenteneingang
- 2x Scart
- PC-Anschluß (D-Sub)
- PC-Audioeingang
- Audioausgang
- digitaler Audioausgang (optisch)
- 1x FBAS
- 1x S-Video

here is a link to the site i was palning to buy it from. ( its in german)

http://www.redcoon.de/index.php/cmd/shop/a/ProductDetail/pid/B117189/cid/15005/refId/geizhals/
 
I'm thinking of picking this up:

b2c_m_lns2651a.jpg


Specs are here: http://www.samsung.com/Products/TV/LCDTV/LNS2651DXXAA.asp?page=Specifications

Can GAF please educate me with regards to how good this TV will be for gaming? I would expect it to last at least three to four years so I would need it to be relatively futureproof.
 
ElyrionX, since it's brightness contrast lvl is really good and it has HDMI and all that, it should be OK. Don't depend on me tough, don't know too much about these things eighter. I do know 26" widescreen is expensive :)

StRaNgE: the european equivalent (at least I think so, with only 1 component slot) looks to be something like this - also 3000:1 contrast, 23" and boxes on the side. I think?
 
Hey guys, I need some help. I'm looking for an economical HDtv within the next couple months, since I'm buying a Wii. I know the Wii doesn't do 720p, but that's really what I'm after. Here's the deal:

- 720p (but I would take that 768 resolution if I had to)
- 16:9
- over 23" if possible
- headphone jack (I play console games with these in my room)
- sub $400 (or not much over)

Is there anything out there that's like this? That Sammy from a couple pages back would be perfect except I really want something with a little larger screen size, since I'll be sitting about 8 to 10 feet away from it.

Also, I'd take a CRT if I had to, but I'm really just looking for the absolute best my little budget will buy. Bulkiness or looks DOES NOT MATTER, just as long as it works as advertised.

I really appreciate whatever help you folks can offer. Thanks.

EDIT: I live in the US, btw. Thanks again.
 
Jefklak said:
Sorry for this dumb question, but composite is W- R (stereo) - Yellow (video input)
where's the last input on this picture? All i can see is White, Red and the component (RGB) ones.
Sorry that I missed this question last night, but its on the left side of the thing (not in the shot), it has that, an earphone socket and s-video.

This lcd has everything apart from hdmi :)
 
Xdrive05 said:
Hey guys, I need some help. I'm looking for an economical HDtv within the next couple months, since I'm buying a Wii. I know the Wii doesn't do 720p, but that's really what I'm after. Here's the deal:

- 720p (but I would take that 768 resolution if I had to)
- 16:9
- over 23" if possible
- headphone jack (I play console games with these in my room)
- sub $400 (or not much over)

Is there anything out there that's like this? That Sammy from a couple pages back would be perfect except I really want something with a little larger screen size, since I'll be sitting about 8 to 10 feet away from it.

Also, I'd take a CRT if I had to, but I'm really just looking for the absolute best my little budget will buy. Bulkiness or looks DOES NOT MATTER, just as long as it works as advertised.

I really appreciate whatever help you folks can offer. Thanks.

EDIT: I live in the US, btw. Thanks again.

Not really possible with your budget. If it has to be under $400, forget about getting an HDTV, seriously. I got mine for $449 and I wish I waited to save more money up.

You could always consider a monitor, but with only $400, you won't get a quality HDTV.
 
Xdrive05 said:
Hey guys, I need some help. I'm looking for an economical HDtv within the next couple months, since I'm buying a Wii. I know the Wii doesn't do 720p, but that's really what I'm after. Here's the deal:

- 720p (but I would take that 768 resolution if I had to)
- 16:9
- over 23" if possible
- headphone jack (I play console games with these in my room)
- sub $400 (or not much over)

Is there anything out there that's like this? That Sammy from a couple pages back would be perfect except I really want something with a little larger screen size, since I'll be sitting about 8 to 10 feet away from it.

Also, I'd take a CRT if I had to, but I'm really just looking for the absolute best my little budget will buy. Bulkiness or looks DOES NOT MATTER, just as long as it works as advertised.

I really appreciate whatever help you folks can offer. Thanks.

EDIT: I live in the US, btw. Thanks again.
Unless it's a used/refurbished model, the only way you'll get that size/specs with that price is if you find some kind of in-store open box deal. Then you might be able to haggle the price down. Either that or go with an older model CRT which is definitely not recommended.

You'll either have to up your budget or rearrange your room and go for something smaller.
 
Farore said:
Why do companies choose 1366x768 instead of 1280x720 (I asked this question in another thread, but no one answered)? Is there a technical reason? Why not make 720 the standard?

Second, is the upscaling to 1366x768 very noticeable?

I have asked this question many times with no real answer. I have no clue either.
 
I believe it is because it is cheaper and easier for them to manufacture due to 1366x768 just being a wider 1024x768 panel.
 
Heezzi said:
SAMSUNG 940MW-SV Silver 19" 8ms Widescreen LCD Monitor with TV Tuner 300 cd/m2 700:1 Built in Speakers 0.294mm Pixel Pitch

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16824001073

$329, $299 with mail-in rebate.

24-001-073-04.jpg

24-001-073-07.jpg

24-001-073-08.jpg

Wowza. This is pretty practical and stuff.
I'm actually thinking of getting some of these 21-24 inch LCD pannels for each consoles in different rooms, or along the wall.... like a mini kiosk. Then again, buying a house which can have a wall space like that would be another matter... ;)
 
Stin said:
They have this Sanyo 30" HDTV crt at my local Walmart for about $470.

http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.gsp?product_id=2601425
Mine too. Something to point out about this set is that it only displays in 1080i, though. I'm still unsure as to what set exactly I will be purchasing soon, but I'm pretty sure I want one with a 480p mode for best image quality of current (and Wii) stuff.

I've actually been considering the refurbished Philips one Chris_C mentioned earlier for a long, long time (and linked to it in previous HDTV threads), but I guess I did too much research on places like the AVS Forums. Great price, but I read too many stories about people ending up with problems and having a shitty time trying to get them repaired or replaced. I know it's those with the problems who I'm most likely to end up reading about, but now I'm afraid to get a refurbished set from online, unless it has a good warranty.
 
ElyrionX said:
Ummm, so no one has any comments on the Samsung model I posted above?

Please?
Jefklak already told you to get it, so I didn't think you needed more input. ;)

You should be able to get it for well under $900, so it's a great deal if you do. 2 HDMI, 1 component, VGA, headphone jack, 2 RF inputs (though you probably won't make use of 'em) optical out (great bonus!) etc. Great contrast ratio, response time and standardized resolution as well (which will reduced any needed scaling).

Go for it.

MoxManiac said:
Isn't 8ms too slow for gaming??
No way, anything under 12ms is good. You'll only really have ghosting if it's above 12... and you'll only see if at 12 if you're sensitive to it.

You're good to go at 8ms.
 
raYne said:
Jefklak already told you to get it, so I didn't think you needed more input. ;)

You should be able to get it for well under $900, so it's a great deal if you do. 2 HDMI, 1 component, VGA, headphone jack, 2 RF inputs (though you probably won't make use of 'em) optical out (great bonus!) etc. Great contrast ratio, response time and standardized resolution as well (which will reduced any needed scaling).

Go for it.

What do you mean when you refer to "standard resolution" that will reduce any needed scaling?

I'm actually kind of worried that if I were to connect my PS2 on composite (I don't have the S-video or component cables and those are hard to find these days) on this new TV, the graphics would turn out to be too painful to look at.
 
ElyrionX said:
What do you mean when you refer to "standard resolution" that will reduce any needed scaling?

I'm actually kind of worried that if I were to connect my PS2 on composite (I don't have the S-video or component cables and those are hard to find these days) on this new TV, the graphics would turn out to be too painful to look at.
I only meant that the previous tvs/monitors in the thread have a standard resolution that's above the norm. So they'd have to do more scaling of the images.

This one is in line with the norm, so in comparison with the others it'll need to do far less, if any, depending on the source.

Composite is an issue though... you really shouldn't be using composite on an LCD at all. If you're only playing your PS2 on it and won't be getting into next-gen soon I'd wait on the purchase. At least then you can find it even cheaper.
 
ElyrionX said:
I'm actually kind of worried that if I were to connect my PS2 on composite (I don't have the S-video or component cables and those are hard to find these days) on this new TV, the graphics would turn out to be too painful to look at.

Yes, that would be stupid. Get a cheap generic component cable on eBay (Such as this one).
 
raYne said:
I only meant that the previous tvs/monitors in the thread have a standard resolution that's above the norm. So they'd have to do more scaling of the images.

This one is in line with the norm, so in comparison with the others it'll need to do far less, if any, depending on the source.

Composite is an issue though... you really shouldn't be using composite on an LCD at all. If you're only playing your PS2 on it and won't be getting into next-gen soon I'd wait on the purchase. At least then you can find it even cheaper.

Actually the whole point of getting this TV is because the 360 looks like complete ass on my 21" SDTV now. It's so bad that I have to squint to read the damn text in TDU and Ghost Recon.

However, the current gen is far from over with several great PS2 stuff coming right along but it is ending soon so I wouldn't want to spend on a component cable that I won't have much use for. Will it even have much of an effect if I switched from composite to component?

And just how bad will PS2 composite look on a TV like that?
 
Dural said:
I believe it is because it is cheaper and easier for them to manufacture due to 1366x768 just being a wider 1024x768 panel.

As good an answer as any, because there isn't much in the way of answers. 1366x768 is the primary standard for WXGA, so yeah, it's definitely a friendlier way to do things for 1024x768 panel densities. The exact answer is still a mystery though.
 
Top Bottom