Ray Wonder
Founder of the Wounded Tagless Children
Oh wow. That is indisputable. 110% murder. He deserves, at least, life in prison.
It could easily be part of the officer's defense. It'd be a legal killing if he can argue that letting him flee was an imminent danger to the public. Earlier in the video Dubose passed him a Gin bottle. If the officer can argue that he reasonably thought Dubose was intoxicated and had shifted into drive, that could be a defense.
Whether that actually happened or not, the car not being in park is relevant.
I can't believe the focus in this thread on (a) the fact that he was a campus cop (or why there is a need for a campus cop) and (b) whether or not the guy was going to accelerate and drive away.
Seriously?
No one in this thread has defended the cops actions. It's pretty clear he murdered someone.I can't believe the focus in this thread on (a) the fact that he was a campus cop (or why there is a need for a campus cop) and (b) whether or not the guy was going to accelerate and drive away.
Seriously?
Absolutely. And holy hell at the people asking why details are relevant. Details provide potential insight into the thought process that resulted in murder.
Who would say that it justifies murder? That's not the connection.The sad thing is - there WILL be people who will say that the guy shouldn't have resisted and not have been shot if he had just got out of the car. As if that's ever justification for murder.
As a non-american, I'm a bit baffled with unis having their own police, why is this? Can't the city police take care of the uni? Are they only security guards and not real police?
It could easily be part of the officer's defense. It'd be a legal killing if he can argue that letting him flee was an imminent danger to the public. Earlier in the video Dubose passed him a Gin bottle. If the officer can argue that he reasonably thought Dubose was intoxicated and had shifted into drive, that could be a defense.
Whether that actually happened or not, the car not being in park is relevant.
Absolutely. And holy hell at the people asking why details are relevant. Details provide potential insight into the thought process that resulted in murder.
University police tend to act in the best interests of the university, not necessarily the law.
Not defending the officer, but the guy must have put the car in drive before he got shot.
Who would say that it justifies murder? That's not the connection.
The man died. It's possible that if he had gotten out of the car he wouldn't have been killed. Those are facts.
It's also a fact that he shouldn't have been killed.
I don't want to live in a world where it's totally ok if a cop shoots you because they think letting you drive away is imminent danger to the public on the same level as pulling a gun with intent to kill.
I think I know what you're trying to say, but...
It could easily be part of the officer's defense. It'd be a legal killing if he can argue that letting him flee was an imminent danger to the public. Earlier in the video Dubose passed him a Gin bottle. If the officer can argue that he reasonably thought Dubose was intoxicated and had shifted into drive, that could be a defense.
Whether that actually happened or not, the car not being in park is relevant.
I can't believe the focus in this thread on (a) the fact that he was a campus cop (or why there is a need for a campus cop) and (b) whether or not the guy was going to accelerate and drive away.
Seriously?
So why have a thread at all?The video removes doubt that the officer's original claims had validity and cements the reality that this was not a legitimate use of deadly force. The focus on minute details derails the narrative to focus on what-ifs that might paint the victim in a negative light, lessening the perpetrator's culpability.
The back of the car is never shown until it has already crashed.
This is just not true. How can anyone credibly argue that someone driving away was an imminent danger to the public that justified killing someone? When he was pulled over because he didn't have a front license plate? That's just stupid and I can't even believe someone would argue otherwise.
If the cop believed so strongly in what you said, he wouldn't have felt the need to lie about what actually happened.
I don't want to live in a world where it's totally ok if a cop shoots you because they think letting you drive away is imminent danger to the public on the same level as pulling a gun with intent to kill.
Couldn't watch the video. I read a text description instead. My stomach is churning. Fucking disgusting.
The US is a fucked up place. Some schools over there even have cops roaming the halls and are called on when a student is acting out.
System is working.
We're just not part of the plan
What the fuck is the "officer" even reaching for or trying to do there? It's like he purposefully manufactured a confrontation just so he could shoot him.
Yeah, I can see where this is going. I will just wait and see if the officer is rightfully charged for murder.
So why have a thread at all?
It's a chaotic video because the camera is attached to a moving body. People are discussing what happened.
Yeah, sounds fucking insane.
?
It's a fact that it's possible for my power to go out today. Not likely, but it is possible.
It's really important to note that police can't shoot people in the head for speeding away during traffic stops. That's important because whether the guy put the car in drive or intended to drive away is not going to be clear, but it's irrelevant. What is relevant is the fact the officer was not in immediate danger when he fired the gun, and that's all we need to know.
The rate of escalation in that footage is insane. It goes from zero to death in less than 2 seconds.
This is a prime example of why body cams need to be mandatory nationwide. If not for them, they probably would have been successful in their coverup.
After several rewatches:
I can't tell at all what is actually being said, but both parties sound calm up until:
00:52 he hasn't drawn his weapon (you can see his open hand on the car).
00:53 "let's take your seatbelt off(?") cop reaches in. Struggle, boom.
The only possible defense I could see is:
When the cop reached in (to either turn off the car or remove the seatbelt), the victim grabbed his arm. Cop drew his weapon because the car was still in drive, so he feared the victim was going to drag him. Maybe he only drew to threaten, but it went off in the struggle?
Not saying that's what happened or that the cop was right in drawing his weapon, just that that's the only possible defense I could see for his actions. I definitely don't think he stopped the guy with the intention of shooting him.
Exactly.
He was pulled over for not having a front license plate, which is how cars in many states are sold.
He wasnt an armed and dangerous felon escaping from a bank heist or something.
Even if he did flee, the cop should get in his car, follow, and call for backup.
It's important that people understand that even though UC PD are technically a private force they are state sanctioned and trained and should be no different than any other PD in Ohio.
Even if he is he'll get off on appeal and you know it. We can't have cops actually going to prison!Oops, I meant convicted.
I don't want to live in a world where it's totally ok if a cop shoots you because they think letting you drive away is imminent danger to the public on the same level as pulling a gun with intent to kill.
I think I know what you're trying to say, but...
The rate of escalation in that footage is insane. It goes from zero to death in less than 2 seconds.
This is a prime example of why body cams need to be mandatory nationwide. If not for them, they probably would have been successful in their coverup.
Wish the cameras weren't so blurry. What good is that if they aren't useful during movement?
Okay just saw the YouTube version. A lot more clear. This cop will fry.
Gif of shooting
A ton! There'd be no murder charge at all without it.
Crazy cops still act crazy even with body cameras. Shocking.
There needs to be a complete, nationwide overhaul of the hiring, training, and monitoring procedures in conjunction with body cameras.
Thing is though you can't tell if the guy is holding onto his arm in attempt to drag the officer (which seems dumb), or trying to push him off to get away - but why didn't the car move till later?