I'd say hundreds of thousands. Black Americans have bee complaining about police brutality and murders since at least the 1920s.
cop opens the car door
victim shuts it
cop stick his hand in the car to grab the keys
shoots him in the face
The camera was probably the last thing on the dude's mind at the time.
Your date was way off.I'd say hundreds of thousands. Black Americans have been reporting police brutality and murders since forever.
Wow, that's crazy. That was some straight-up murder.
Man, Pennsylvania v. Mimms was an awful SCOTUS decision. Maybe if cops had to have a reasonable basis for suspecting that a man is a threat before ordering him out of his car, they wouldn't feel entitled to try and yank people out of their cars and kill them or get them killed in the process.
Not that, you know, the fault isn't entirely with the murderer in this case. I just mean that PA v. Mimms is one small feature of our justice system that contributes to this stuff.
what the fuck.........................
COME THE FUCK ON?!@?!?@!?
Glad he's going to jail that piece of shit.
The camera was probably the last thing on the dude's mind at the time.
Your date was way off.
"Complaining" is a misnomer. It's not a complaint. It's reporting. No one believes them when it happens, though.
I don't think that court decision is particularly relevant. To defend his actions the officer basically has to say any reasonable person in his shoes in the moment would agree it was the right call (Graham v. Connor). I don't think that'll be a successful defense in this case.
I had no idea those murder charges in Ohio didn't require premeditation, though. http://codes.ohio.gov/orc/2903.02
"Complaining" just comes off as condescending in this regard especially considering the circumstances.Complain, reporting, protesting, screaming. You know what I meant.
Now you know to weigh the words of officers less. They always lie, it's part of the game.REQUEST: Someone's going to do it, but when it happens, can people please make sure to warn us before linking to the inevitable "image stabilization" version of the body cam. I don't want to see that.
Its true. I was on the officers side based on original report. I heard about the bottle of booze and assumed he was drunk. Assumed he sped off, and the officer shot him to stop a drunk driver from possibly harming the public.
All bullshit.
The article is from February but I don't think it is well known. It should have made national headlines. There is a LOT more in the link.“I have a method for getting people off the street that should not be there. Mouthy drivers, street lawyers, assholes and just anyone else trying to make my job difficult. Under my floor mat, I keep a small plastic dime baggie with Cocaine in residue. Since it’s just residue, if it is ever found during a search of my car like during an inspection, it’s easy enough to explain. It must have stuck to my foot while walking through San Castle. Anyways, no one’s going to question an empty baggie. The residue is the key because you can fully charge some asshole with possession of cocaine, heroin, or whatever just with the residue. How to get it done? “I asked Mr. DOE for his identification. And he pulled out his wallet, I observed a small plastic baggie fall out of his pocket…” You get the idea. easy, right? Best part is, those baggies can be found lots of places so you can always be ready. Don’t forget to wipe the baggie on the persons skin after you arrest them because you want their DNA on the bag if they say you planted it or fight it in court.”
Man, that's some terrible, senseless killing.
Now that I see the clearer video, it does seem apparent that the officer got dragged (there is a car in the background that is visibly closer when the officer gets back on his feet).
My feeling is that a police officer is senselessly throwing themselves in danger's way by trying to hold onto a moving car (what could possibly be accomplished that way?), but I feel like this is going to be a sticking point for the defense.
Whether or not he was dragged, though, shooting the driver is neither humane nor effective.
The victim clearly does not go for the cops arm at any point.Man, that video only says to me clearer than ever that the officer went for him rather than the ignition. Defense might argue that it looks that way because the victim went for the cops arm though. Whatever the case, disgusting, unjustifiable, murder.
"Complaining" just comes off as condescending in this regard especially considering the circumstances.
What?! The majority of the military are paper pushers. Also, there a lot of people serving in the medical field in their respective branches. I don't think you understand how large the Nurse Corps, Medical Corps, and Dental Corps are in the armed services.This job, along with the military, is always going to attract assholes who want to use and abuse power over other people due to its nature. You can weed some of them out (Zimmerman's multiple failed attempts to join are an example of the system doing its job correctly), but people will always be able to lie and cover for themselves. 24/7 monitoring via cameras is a huge step in getting even the assholes to behave- but it won't help a department like the NYPD which is rotten to is core.
Yup. 24/7 monitoring while on the job is imperative.
So, does the footage cut off at the end just in this released version so we don't see anything too graphic, or did the cop turn his camera off? Sorry if this has been answered.
Yep, it's the whole point of the cameras. Ideally you reach a point if you were one often enough, you forget it's there. Just like this jackass did.
He got dragged because when he shot Sam the car started going forward. The car didn't move before the cop shot Sam.
Updated gif of shooting:
What?! The majority of the military are paper pushers. Also, there a lot of people serving in the medical field in their respective branches. I don't think you understand how large the Nurse Corps, Medical Corps, and Dental Corps are in the armed services.
We get it, you don't like the military, but to make bullshit generalizations like this needs to be called out.
Whether the car moved at all (even idling) before the gun fired is unfortunately not 100% clear in the video, and it's probably going to be something the defense will focus on.
Fuck, if you slow it down to .25 it looks like he even pins him down with his left arm to shoot him.
Whether the car moved at all (even idling) before the gun fired is unfortunately not 100% clear in the video, and it's probably going to be something the defense will focus on.
So, does the footage cut off at the end just in this released version so we don't see anything too graphic, or did the cop turn his camera off? Sorry if this has been answered.
Probably, but at least the cop is getting a murder charge instead of internal investigation and administrative leave.
Body cams are leading to slow progress.
EDIT: Also, is it common for American universities to have their own police departments? My campus had like 3 security guards in a little house, armed with flashlights.
Now you're just getting angry and dismissive for some reason when I was never condescending to you or the situation.Yes because I was totally trying to be condescending about the circumstance. Unlike your posts.
Complain - 'state that one is suffering from'
Go somewhere with your nonsense mate.
Why hasn't every police chief in the country sat down with all his cops and just said "ok guys, stop pulling people over for minor shit. Busted lights, maybe expired tags, not signaling, not completely coming to a stop, jaywalking, smoking weed, whatever. We are all looking like idiot racist retards - lets try to get to at least 30 days without killing an innocent person, ok?"
Dashcam will show exactly what is unclear.
Now you're just getting angry and dismissive for some reason when I was never condescending to you or the situation.
I'm well aware of the denotative meaning of "complain."
I was referring to the connotative way people can interpret the word "complain."
People "complain" about a lot of things, a lot of them minor and petty. Black people's suffering at the hands of law enforcement is well beyond that.
No, ideally you don't forget it's there and therefore don't shoot people for no reason.
Man, that's some terrible, senseless killing.
Now that I see the clearer video, it does seem apparent that the officer got dragged (there is a car in the background that is visibly closer when the officer gets back on his feet).
My feeling is that a police officer is senselessly throwing themselves in danger's way by trying to hold onto a moving car (what could possibly be accomplished that way?), but I feel like this is going to be a sticking point for the defense.
Whether or not he was dragged, though, shooting the driver is neither humane nor effective.
Whether the car moved at all (even idling) before the gun fired is unfortunately not 100% clear in the video, and it's probably going to be something the defense will focus on.
I think it's plain to see that firing the weapon (whether or not the car moved, and even if the shot hadn't been fatal) was very wrong, and I hope that the jury doesn't get caught up in the inevitable "if the car moved, you must acquit" argument
Yeah, I didn't realize I was talking to a child.You done yet mate?
That's why having dash cam footage would make it much clearer, if it exists.
I don't think even saying "I was dragged at low speed for a second" is enough to make it a reasonable shooting for a jury though. Makes sense he might have panicked, but when you have other options in the situation like just letting go, it's hard to defend shooting the guy.
He's probably referencing the high ratio of aggressive/violent people who join the military vs other occupations. Can't find the study itself, sorry--it was reference in The Invisible War (the first time I'd heard it).