• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Cinematography |OT| (Movies/TV)

Cosmic Smash

Cosmic Smash

Member
Insane Metal said:
What's the difference between cinematography and photography in movies?
Click to expand...
It's the same thing. Cinematographer/Director of photography.
Cinematography is the art of photography and visual storytelling in a motion picture or television show. Cinematography comprises all on-screen visual elements, including lighting, framing, composition, camera motion, camera angles, film selection, lens choices, depth of field, zoom, focus, color, exposure, and filtration.
Click to expand...

What is a Director of Photography?
As some confusion exists about the title "director of photography," perhaps a brief summary at this time would be in order. Since the inception of the movies, there have been cameramen. Then, as the peculiar technique of cinema was developed, the cameraman became the cinematographer. As the industry progressed, cinematography took on specialized fields. The cinematographer now devoted more of his talents to composition and lighting and left the mechanics of the camera to members of his staff. Today he directs and supervises the efforts of a large crew of workers, and is known as the director of photography. He selects the composition, sets the exposure, conceives the lighting, and designates the filters or other photographic con-trols to be employed.

Some may well ask, "How does motion picture photography differ from regular photography?" While photography is the basis for this field, the requirements for telling a story on motion picture film have created a technique quite unique from that which went before. The use of moving figures, the lighting technique utilized to obtain plasticity, the effective use of relatively short-focus lenses, as well as the mobile camera, are all examples peculiar to cinematography. In the very early days, cameramen invented the fade-out and fade-in, the lap-dissolve, the matte shot, the process shot, and numerous other special effects that have been incorporated into the technique of writing for the screen.

One of the great problems of picture production is securing stories for the screen. Several hundred productions are turned out annually by the industry, and any author will concur that no such number of new plots exist. The studios are therefore obliged to revamp many of the old reliables, give them new casts and dialogue, a change of locale, and depend heavily on new photographic treatment. This continual search for a new photographic approach is one of the most exciting aspects of the industry. Thousands of workers throughout the land have a hand in it: the physicist creating a new or better product; the chemist perfecting a better formula; the engineer fabricating a machine that will do that which could not be done before. The writer devising a scene in some new and unusual setting, and the producer, director and cinematographer translating it finally to film are all part of a team striving to do something better and more interesting than it was ever done before.

That the director of photography will contribute his share is taken for granted in Hollywood. Every production attempts to be different from another, and each presents a challenge for a new photographic approach. The director and cinematographer work as a team, and exchange suggestions about the lighting and staging of scenes. Whenever possible, the style of lighting is varied from sequence to sequence so as to add interest and impact to the photographic effects.

At all times must the players be photographed to their best advantage. The studios have made tremendous investments in building their stars. Every effort is expended to display them most ideally. As no retouching is possible on movie film, our stars must be very carefully lit so that they appear their most glamorous. The science of lighting is therefore highly developed among the directors of photography, and is an art that is constantly being refined.

We strive to obtain photographic interest combined with a sense of reality, yet being on guard that the photography never detract nor overpower the story being unfolded upon the screen. Our lighting technique has lent its influence to other branches of the arts. Commercial and portrait studios frequently adopt our style and use much of the equipment developed by cinematographers.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Cosmic Smash

Cosmic Smash

Member
All Is Lost (2013)

Dir: J. C. Chandor, DP: Frank G. DeMarco


ERebUEkWoAAeEFw
 
Doczu

Doczu

Member
Husky said:
And to add another TV show, Channel 4's Utopia always impresses.

Glad to see I'm not the first to add Sunshine here, too. Man, that film achieved cosmic horror using the sun instead of any sentient beasts. That was brilliant.
And for more stunningly-shot cosmic horror films, there's The Void, Resolution, and its sequel The Endless.
Click to expand...
Utopia - ❤️ pains me they killed it off..

And thank for 3 cosmic horror movies i've never heard off. Gotta see them ASAP.
ammodotcom said:
Click to expand...

It's beautiful, but when you think about how this movie literaly killed a lot of the staff in the long run...
EightBit Man said:
Click to expand...

To be fair i knew this movie would be a dissapointment but i wanted to see it in cinema for the big screen effect. Was not dissapointed with how it looked like, at least.
 
ROMhack

ROMhack

Member
I can't post images as I'm at work but I watched a movie last night called Labyrinth of Dreams - super obscure B&W Japanese movie from 1997, mentioning for my hipster cred.

Anyway the cinematography is great. It's made to look like an old Japanese film from the 50s. Thematically the symbolism is what non-hipsters would call 'Lynchian'- meaning it's weird and doesn't make sense.

 
Last edited:
ROMhack

ROMhack

Member
Somnium said:
Well I'm enamored by Kubrick's films, so I don't mind lol
Click to expand...

Oh yeah, didn't mean they're bad. I was only talking as a subscriber to his channel - and admittedly one who subbed because I really liked that one about yakuza movies.

What's your favourite Kubrick?
 
teezzy

teezzy

Banned
Love Exposure (2008)
Cinematographer: Sōhei Tanikawa



Easily one of the wildest, most breathtaking, flicks I've seen. Shit's like 4 hours long but so worth it, which is so fucking rare. Absolutley hilarious too. If you enjoy weird Asian cinema you really owe yourselfto watch this at least once.

b7ef3ec9a19297fde113a6b47698c107.gif


love_exposure.jpg


love-exposure-destacada.jpg


love-exposure-sion-sono-2008-07.jpg


Love-Exposure.jpg


love_exposure_lrg.jpg


7620d50f5609380fcce23a8785006152.png




 
Tenaciousmo

Tenaciousmo

Member
So, no one is talking about my favorite DoP, Robert Yeoman and i'm taking offense. Heres to remedy the situation

The Grand Budapest Hotel
thumb-1920-760735.jpg


thumb-1920-547406.jpg


thumb-1920-823463.jpg


thumb-1920-760732.png


screen-shot-2014-06-08-at-00-32-40.png


screen-shot-2014-06-08-at-00-33-35.png


screen-shot-2014-06-08-at-00-39-48.png
Click to expand...

Darjeeling Limited
MV5BNjU1MzA5MzQzOF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwOTg1OTY4NA@@._V1_SY1000_CR0,0,1493,1000_AL_.jpg


MV5BODQxNzkwODA3Ml5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMzk1OTY4NA@@._V1_SY1000_CR0,0,1494,1000_AL_.jpg


1*CLg76FdOifCI_OcsDcaqDg.jpeg
Click to expand...
I really love wes anderson's movies and just find every single shots in those movies whimsical and always warms my usually cold insides.

[can't even get most of the good stills due to me being on work computer and having limited access]

 
M

mortal

Banned
eot said:
The shot the last still is showing always bugs me because it looks like K is gazing too high, like at her hairline or something. Oversight or just me?
Click to expand...
I don't think so. His eyeline seems to line up fine with Joi's. The hologram is pretty huge after all.
 
Rat Rage

Rat Rage

Member
Benjamin_MFF said:
Rat Rage Rat Rage Ridley Scott is a director, he may choose amazing cinematographers, but he is not a cinematographer.
Click to expand...

You're right. He is not technically a cinematographer. However, he's one of the few directors who draws his storyboards by himself before every movie. He went to art school, has an artistic background and he's supposedly pretty good at painting/drawing.
Now the question is: how much of the final visuals of a movie are only the credit of a cinematographer. For sure, a cinematographer plays a big role, but I'd say - I could be wrong, though - that a director like Ridley Scott, who not only envisions every single scene of the movie in his head, but also scatches them all out before he starts to shoot, plays a big part in the final result as well.

For example: A page of the 1979 story board of Alien scatched by Ridley Scott.

tumblr_ljs6i0y7FD1qinfuro1_1280.jpg



 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

  • Locked
Is there a reason why America loves movie/TV show titles with the word "American" ?
2
97
8K
impact replied
  • Locked
COMICS!!! |OT| May 2017 - Every Empire Falls
123 124 125 126 127
6K
351K
Freezasaurus replied
  • Locked
15 Films to See in June (what are you watching?)
2
71
9K
Toothless replied
  • Locked
15 Films to See in November (what are you watching?)
2 3
112
12K
User 479360 replied
  • Locked
Let's talk John Carpenter / Carpenter 101
2 3 4 5
229
31K
Fancy Clown replied
Top Bottom