Okay then. The context of the discussion was swastika name badges in Black Ops, and that they were inappropriate. In that context, the original comment states that the same name badge, which was viewed as inappropriate in Black Ops, would somehow be viewed as appropriate in W@W because the context of the game includes swastikas. That argument is patently ridiculous; players who choose to identify themselves with a swastika as their
permanent emblem are either immature enough to think that it's somehow humorous, or trolls who are looking to get a rise out of others, regardless of the context of the game and whether or not a particular scenario might randomly place you on the German side. Sure, there's that bizarre minority that claim to be exercising their rights to free speech, or representing the
symbol's original meaning, or some other nonsense like that. But anyone with half a brain should understand the message of hate that the symbol carries, and should want nothing at all to do with anyone who would willingly identify themselves with that symbol.
The original argument was ridiculous on its face and has no merit in a post-Nazi world, especially one where anti-Semitism, while not as prevalent as it once was, it still a very real problem.