This.
Rutgers is lucky Mizzou bailed for the SEC early or they'd probably be stuck in the AAC.
nah, Big wanted to go east. Mizzou isn't money, Rutgers is even though it's only because of the million of rich BiG alums in NJ/NYC.
This.
Rutgers is lucky Mizzou bailed for the SEC early or they'd probably be stuck in the AAC.
nah, Big wanted to go east. Mizzou isn't money, Rutgers is even though it's only because of the million of rich BiG alums in NJ/NYC.
Yeah, RU got really lucky due to their location. TV said that NJ/NY market could be claimed for subscribers whether or not people actually watch. Bottom line was those fees could still be collected which made RU a treasure trove on that front.
Pernetti out according to ESPN.
What a clustercuss.
The politicians are safe. Only entity which will be hurt is Rutgers. As for the Rivals board, while it's embarrassing this is the straw that broke the camel's back.
There's actually some rationality there too.
And Draxal, no I am not familiar with the dynamics of NJ politics and how they relate to RU - seems weird that it isn't favorable considering you're the flagship, though.
But I do know schools have BS to deal with regarding support in the state. Bills pushed through to separate schools more and favor funding, officials doing as much as possible to stifle progress of other universities - UCF had to fight like hell to get their medical school approved after objections from UF/FSU and others.
We've had to stop projects even though we didn't need state funding and were able to demonstrate a net positive on the economy after objections from people that have other interests in mind. Trust me, I know it is frustrating at least on some level.
The politicians are safe. Only entity which will be hurt is Rutgers. As for the Rivals board, while it's embarrassing this is the straw that broke the camel's back.
Edit: Barchi might scrape by. Doubt Rutgers really cares about the desires of its alums. The alums overwhelmingly voted to keep TP on the Targum straw poll
Lurker here: Is there any chance that this scandal can scuttle the Rutgers to B1G deal? I know B1G wants that NY/NJ television market, but would they be willing to back out of the deal in order to avoid admitting a school that's getting over a major* scandal, especially considering the whole Penn State thing?
Lurker here: Is there any chance that this scandal can scuttle the Rutgers to B1G deal? I know B1G wants that NY/NJ television market, but would they be willing to back out of the deal in order to avoid admitting a school that's getting over a major* scandal, especially considering the whole Penn State thing?
I couldn't imagine something like that happening. In the scheme of things, this isn't a big thing at all.
Lurker here: Is there any chance that this scandal can scuttle the Rutgers to B1G deal?
I think everyone cares for a little off season excitement and scandal.He is getting a raw deal, he's the sacrificial goat.
Straw poll here:
Does anybody besides me and Sirpopopopop actually care what happened?
I have a feelign it's going to be nobody gives a shit, so I wonder why ESPN is carrying this hard on.
Lurker here: Is there any chance that this scandal can scuttle the Rutgers to B1G deal? I know B1G wants that NY/NJ television market, but would they be willing to back out of the deal in order to avoid admitting a school that's getting over a major* scandal, especially considering the whole Penn State thing?
How's Sonny Dykes fitting in?I'm switching to Auburn, the only college team that has no fairweather fans.
Yeah, I know that. It's why I added the asterix to "major".
Dear Dr. Barchi:
I write in confirmation of our conversation earlier today during which we agreed that it was in the best interests of Rutgers University that I step down from my position as Director of Intercollegiate Athletics. I do so reluctantly because I always have and always will love Rutgers. I want to thank the people who have supported me throughout my years as a student-athlete and Athletic Director and help them understand my reasoning in this situation.
My continued tenure as Athletic Director is no longer sustainable for the University which I attended and where a piece of me will always remain. In connection with the incidents involving former basketball Coach Mike Rice, as was the case with all other matters which I handled on behalf of the University, I always tried my best to do what is right. I have spent a great deal of time reflecting on the events which led to today. As you know, my first instincts when I saw the videotape of Coach Rice's behavior was to fire him immediately. However, Rutgers decided to follow a process involving university lawyers, human resources professionals, and outside counsel. Following review of the independent investigative report, the consensus was that university policy would not justify dismissal. I have admitted my role in, and regret for, that decision, and wish that I had the opportunity to go back and override it for the sake of everyone involved.
I trust that my tenure at Rutgers will not be judged by this one incident. I am proud of my efforts to lead Rutgers into the Big Ten, and of all of the accomplishments of our student-athletes in the classroom and on the field of play. I want to thank our great fans, the hardest working staff in collegiate athletics, and every one of our fine student-athletes. It has been my great pleasure to serve my alma mater.
Sincerely,
Tim Pernetti
Class of 1993
I think there is a 10-20% chance that it could happen. The anti-athletic contingent at Rutgers is working with ESPN on this one.
Oh and don't even start anything mcgruber. I'm being nice right now, but I have no problems getting banned if you're going to indulge in gloating.
I think there is a 10-20% chance that it could happen. The anti-athletic contingent at Rutgers is working with ESPN on this one.
Oh and don't even start anything mcgruber. I'm being nice right now, but I have no problems getting banned if you're going to indulge in gloating.
I'd say 1%-2%. B1G isn't taking back an invite over this. It would be RU voluntarily moving on. And even given this situation, they're not THAT stupid.
You don't understand Rutgers, some of the faculty think athletics is holding us back from being an Ivy league institute.
Tim Pernetti said:. In connection with the incidents involving former basketball Coach Mike Rice, as was the case with all other matters which I handled on behalf of the University, I always tried my best to do what is right. I have spent a great deal of time reflecting on the events which led to today. As you know, my first instincts when I saw the videotape of Coach Rice's behavior was to fire him immediately. However, Rutgers decided to follow a process involving university lawyers, human resources professionals, and outside counsel. Following review of the independent investigative report, the consensus was that university policy would not justify dismissal.
Lurker here: Is there any chance that this scandal can scuttle the Rutgers to B1G deal? I know B1G wants that NY/NJ television market, but would they be willing to back out of the deal in order to avoid admitting a school that's getting over a major* scandal, especially considering the whole Penn State thing?
Draxal - the key portion of the letter is this:
Glad to see he's not going to take it on the chin.
Edit: Yeah, Goldeneye. It's not just faculty. It's the state too. They don't hold their own lack of funding culpable. They are completely delusional in what they think Rutgers should be.
I'd say 1%-2%. B1G isn't taking back an invite over this. It would be RU voluntarily moving on. And even given this situation, they're not THAT stupid.
Edit: How are your employment laws such that abusing players like that isn't a cut and dry "get the fuck out of here" action? Sirpopopo said General Counsel got the boot too, though? I'm just confused and mindfucked right about now.
Lurker here: Is there any chance that this scandal can scuttle the Rutgers to B1G deal? I know B1G wants that NY/NJ television market, but would they be willing to back out of the deal in order to avoid admitting a school that's getting over a major* scandal, especially considering the whole Penn State thing?
Oh damn, Rugters is in for a world of hurt.
Who do you think comes in to replace Pernetti?
Sandusky
In all seriousness, it's going to be some christie/sweeney hack that is going to take the job.
It's all politics.
Hm, seems to be the conventional wisdom. Sucks.... only right that at least the Prez gets the boot too. We'll see if he can survive this.
It's amazing how the UNC situation didn't really blow up like this. I mean, that challenged the very integrity of the academic nature of the school. Weird how these things work.
RU is definitely important - it's just one of those things that would have blown over in a day or two if handled correctly the first time.
Rutgers went from an ESPN school to a Fox school. Pernetti was a key person in vetoing the initial ESPN contract which at the time was a joke.
Put 2 and 2 together and I'm never watching an ESPN show again.
True forgot about that. Although I think with more time and open negotiations that BE configuration would have gotten a lot more - but that's a different discussion. And obviously you don't wait once you have a Big 10 invite.
I've managed to avoid SportsCenter at the very least for a few months now. Don't actually remember the last time I watched ESPN in general. Although that will unfortunately end since AAC is back on ESPN for sports.
They're vindictive fuckers. Helped to blow up a conference and now helping to wreak havoc on your school.
Bruce Feldman said:Rutgers prez stressed that mike rice was "not fired for cause.".. "I just fired him."
Is this bad?
Why would he say that.Is this bad?
You mean you're not happy with Danny G locked up until 2060?I wish something like this would happen to UCLA so the whole administration could get cleaned out.
Christie forced this on Rutgers. This is going to turn out to be very bad for Christie, as he got an innocent man fired, and just pissed off an entire alumni base.