Aren't you a Rutgers guy? You should know there's no space. Oh wait, I forgot, Rutgers sucks at that too.
Could always promote NW's mens from club, they'll just need another woman's sport for Title 9.
I'm not sure how much resistance will be there on NW's part.
jNW won't add men's lacrosse because of Title IX since there's no easy women's add. Also their club team is in no sense promotable (unlike Michigan's was.) If an existing school adds the sport (and I think that's more likely than Hopkins giving up independence,) my guess would be, in order, Michigan State or Illinois, with an outside shot at Wisconsin or Minnesota.
Johns Hopkins confirmed.
I hope they don't go that route. I hate that affiliate member bullshit.
Hopkins would be the only affiliate I'd be able to stomach, but this season is a perfect reason why Hopkins will remain the Notre Dame of lacrosse. Very weak season, but they're still on the tournament bubble based on name alone.
Literally any other school added as an affiliate would weaker than the Maryland/Rutgers round of expansion and would make the conference look desperate. It'd be better to just pay an existing member to add the sport.
It still surprises me that Northwestern doesn't have a varsity men's lacrosse team yet.
Given the sport's connection to wealth and prestige, it seems perfect for an elite private school like Northwestern.
There's more to it than that, there's Title IX and there's also the fact that jNW is the least athletically minded B1G member. With just 19 sports, it has fewer sports than Purdue (who doesn't seem to "compete" in anything beyond football and basketball) and Maryland (who just cut a ton of sports and jumped conferences to make budget.)