• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

COMICS! |OT| June 2016. The Manhattan Project

Messi

Member
I'm starting to realize why I prefer DC over Marvel..

When I read DC, I feel like I'm reading a fantasy universe, with these larger than life gods, It feels like a mythology in its self.... The characters actually feel like superheroes

When I read Marvel, it just feels like I'm reading a real world comic with superhero and fantasy elements in it... The characters don't really mythic or "heroes"

of course this is a reason many prefer Marvel, which is understandable, its just something I think i finally came to the realization of

I was under the impression that this was very much intentional by both companies.
 

MaxHouse

Banned

both companies have elements of both, obviously since alot of times their pulling from the same pool of writers


but there is this feeling that Marvel has been more culturally aware of real world issues while DC tended to be stay within the realm of fantasy

I don't know how much of that is founded though
 

VanWinkle

Member
Plenty of grounded superheroes and plenty of god-like superheroes on both sides really. I've never really subscribed to that idea of there being this big schism between the two in that area.
 

Rhaknar

The Steam equivalent of the drunk friend who keeps offering to pay your tab all night.
both companies have elements of both, obviously since alot of times their pulling from the same pool of writers


but there is this feeling that Marvel has been more culturally aware of real world issues while DC tended to be stay within the realm of fantasy

I don't know how much of that is founded though

the fact that marvel uses real life locations makes it more relatable maybe?
 
Plenty of grounded superheroes and plenty of god-like superheroes on both sides really. I've never really subscribed to that idea of there being this big schism between the two in that area.

You should read JLA/Avengers. I think Busiek puts forward a good view of the differences in relationships between the super-heroes and non-superheroes in both universes.
 
Death Force #1
I was kind of into this at first, but then
the rape happened
and I realized this was going to be like any other stereotypical male-oriented action movie. Since it's only six issues I may keep reading it. I dunno. Shit makes me uncomfortable and it'll be on my mind all day
 

Vyer

Member
Exactly. Yeah,
we know he's not going to die, but that's not the point. There needs to be a real emotional weight regardless, and you simply can't have emotional weight for a character that early on. We're like in the first 2 minutes of the movie, or the prologue of a huge book. It's too early for me to feel anything. They haven't earned THAT scene yet.

I think a lot of the things it focused on are pretty established core elements of the character and have that weight because of it. I don't think those elements are really something I necessarily need a writer to rehash each time they come on board (unless obviously they are changing it).

In any case,
as I said i feel like it was less about "The Death of Batman!" and more about what he is and the juxtaposition that was about to happen with the Gotham twins and what they represent in this universe.
 
Very interested to see these discussions on Batman #1. I thought Batman Rebirth was pointless and boring, but this first issue was pretty dang perfect. I'm particular,
the scene on the plane where the ranting passenger goes on about the hero Gotham deserves, and it cuts to the boy seeing Batman holding onto the wing...HOT DAMN, that's good comics.
Just iconic as hell. I'll agree that the attempt to pull my heartstrings didn't work, but that never works for me in comics. I don't tear up or get worked up over funny books.

King hasn't totally won me over yet, but two issues in and I'm onboard. I'll blame the Rebirth misfire on the dual writing credit and DC wanting to push out multiple #1s to boost sales.
 

Brian Fellows

Pete Carroll Owns Me
Eww. I'll just wait until CBR posts them.

I also made a list of the new and returning series for September.

New and returning series from the new Image solicits......

Seven to Eternity #1 - Remender and Opena

Surgeon X #1 - Sarah Kenney and John Watkiss

Eclipse #1 - Zachary Kaplan and Giovanni Timpano

Glitterbomb #1 - Jim Zub and Djibril Morissette-Phan

Hadrian's Wall #1 (of 8) - Kyle Higgins Alec Siegel and Rod Reis

Deadly Class #22

The Fix #5

Invisible Republic #11

Wayward #16

Monstress #7

Red One #3

Southern Cross #7

The Wicked + The Divine 1831 #1 (One Shot)




Some really nice turnarounds there by Deadly Class, Monstress, and The Fix.
 
I think a lot of the things it focused on are pretty established core elements of the character and have that weight because of it. I don't think those elements are really something I necessarily need a writer to rehash each time they come on board (unless obviously they are changing it).

In any case,
as I said i feel like it was less about "The Death of Batman!" and more about what he is and the juxtaposition that was about to happen with the Gotham twins and what they represent in this universe.

I know this is the internet and we're never supposed to admit we may have been wrong about something or that somebody changed our mind, but well.

You haven't completely changed my mind but you have given me a lot to think about regarding King's Batman. Not enough to compel me to re-read but I'll certainly be keeping your analysis in mind when the next issue hits.
 

Sandfox

Member
I don't get people who want comics to regress back to the 90s. It might just be an age thing though.

Also, people are starting to think that Marvel is hint at
undoing OMD
with Dead No More due to various recent references.
 
Shit. I just realized that Lobdell is getting up there as far as writers having really long runs on properties. He's been running Red Hood books for what, five years now?
GOOD THING
I know it sucked, but it lead to a lot of good stuff. I mean, BND was pretty heavily praised from what I've seen. Would undoing it really be all that great?
 

Rhaknar

The Steam equivalent of the drunk friend who keeps offering to pay your tab all night.
Best thing. Fucking let superheroes grow up and get married and be miserable like the majority of their readership does
 
Best thing. Fucking let superheroes grow up and get married and be miserable like the majority of their readership does
Oh I wholeheartedly agree, I'm just wondering if
undoing it at this point really makes that much of a difference. It's not like undoing the New 52. Or is it?
 

Rhaknar

The Steam equivalent of the drunk friend who keeps offering to pay your tab all night.
BK read E for Extinction.

Do you even have a MU sub? And if not, why not?
 

BrightLightLava

Unconfirmed Member
The thing that I always find funny about time passing in the super hero universes is that it seems like the kids grow up, but the adults always stay the same age.

Like Batman, he's more or less the same age as he was when Dick was Robin, but now Dick is just a few years younger and Bruce hasn't changed at all.

Spider-Man, went from being a teenager to being an adult, and then stopped.

I also love the fan theory that Franklin Richards is using his powers to keep people the same age while time moves forward around them.
 

Rhaknar

The Steam equivalent of the drunk friend who keeps offering to pay your tab all night.
I assume so but has there been a story / event with Franklin as the villain?
 
Like Batman, he's more or less the same age as he was when Dick was Robin, but now Dick is just a few years younger and Bruce hasn't changed at all.

End of Batman New 52 spoilers:
Technically, he's now younger, at least physically. All the damage he built up over his years as Batman has been healed up, stuff like scar tissue and all that.
 

Rhaknar

The Steam equivalent of the drunk friend who keeps offering to pay your tab all night.
Echo mentioning Onslaught made me want to read that arc again, looked it up on MU and the first issue they have for it is Excalibur #100, written by...Warren Ellis :eek:

Whut? Was he on the book long and was it good?
 

Vyer

Member
I know this is the internet and we're never supposed to admit we may have been wrong about something or that somebody changed our mind, but well.

You haven't completely changed my mind but you have given me a lot to think about regarding King's Batman. Not enough to compel me to re-read but I'll certainly be keeping your analysis in mind when the next issue hits.

echobro, I'm wrong all the time and this may be another one of those times lol, but I appreciate you saying that.

I get a lot of what you and a couple other guys are saying, really, it just seemed pretty deliberate to not be
a lot of setup for what the Gotham twins might be bringing to the story.
 

Ponn

Banned
I got my next IST order including a copy of Neonomicon TPB finally. Time to settle in for a night of tentacle porn by Alan Moore.
 

Brian Fellows

Pete Carroll Owns Me
Echo mentioning Onslaught made me want to read that arc again, looked it up on MU and the first issue they have for it is Excalibur #100, written by...Warren Ellis :eek:

Whut? Was he on the book long and was it good?

His work on AoA was pretty good compared to the writing in some of the other titles in that event.
 

squadr0n

Member
Question for people with the 52 Omnibus or just in the know. Which arcs are written by which authors? Like for example which books/arcs were written by Morrison or Rucka? Ive heard that there is some bonus material in the back of the omnibus where the authors talk about their individual issues or storylines rather and am kinda curious as to who wrote what as im reading it for the first time now.

Also is there a good guide as to what I need to read before and during Infinite Crisis? What are the more influential titles to read? I really dont need all the minor tie ins and stuff. Which books feature Super Boy Primes story stuff/?
 

VanWinkle

Member
Question for people with the 52 Omnibus or just in the know. Which arcs are written by which authors? Like for example which books/arcs were written by Morrison or Rucka? Ive heard that there is some bonus material in the back of the omnibus where the authors talk about their individual issues or storylines rather and am kinda curious as to who wrote what as im reading it for the first time now.

Also is there a good guide as to what I need to read before and during Infinite Crisis? What are the more influential titles to read? I really dont need all the minor tie ins and stuff. Which books feature Super Boy Primes story stuff/?

I just looked through some of the issues and it looks like all of them say they're written by Rucka, Morrison, Waid, and Johns. Seems like just one big ol collaboration.
 

kmfdmpig

Member
the fact that marvel uses real life locations makes it more relatable maybe?

It was also how Marvel differentiated themselves early on. Spider-Man had problems with bullies, money, etc... Tony Stark had alcohol issues. The Fantastic Four had family squabbles, etc...

Other than Green Lantern/Green Arrow's notable social stuff DC didn't really touch on those grounded problems as much in the 60s and 70s, so DC was fantastical and Marvel was easier for most people to relate to.

Question for people with the 52 Omnibus or just in the know. Which arcs are written by which authors? Like for example which books/arcs were written by Morrison or Rucka? Ive heard that there is some bonus material in the back of the omnibus where the authors talk about their individual issues or storylines rather and am kinda curious as to who wrote what as im reading it for the first time now.

Also is there a good guide as to what I need to read before and during Infinite Crisis? What are the more influential titles to read? I really dont need all the minor tie ins and stuff. Which books feature Super Boy Primes story stuff/?

I don't think they ever really break it down. It's those four with help from Giffen as far as I can tell, and I don't think it was issue by issue. I suspect that Morrison was doing the mad scientist stuff and the space stuff with Animal Man, Starfire and Adam Strange, Rucka the Question stuff, Johns the Black Adam stuff, but I'm not sure if anyone has ever really broken down who did what.



DC rebirth has been a pleasant surprise so far. I've read everything except Batman so far and all of the books have been average to very good, which is better than I would have anticipated. DC seems to be in a better place than they've been since 2009-2010.
 

Rhaknar

The Steam equivalent of the drunk friend who keeps offering to pay your tab all night.
I forgot how good the lead up to Onslaught was. Event aside, this shit leading up to it is really cool. These issues with Onslaught putting the whammy on Jean in a store with the "lol Xavier is like a father to you? Then check this memory out" moment, Juggernaut going to the mansion so Jean could help him, the whole vibe of a quiet evening in the x-mansion, no big villains, no big fights, and then bam, the "call was coming from inside the house", great stuff. And they had been sprinkling the name Onslaught for months too iirc, the whole thing was really well done.

Until the actual event of course >_>
 
I forgot how good the lead up to Onslaught was. Event aside, this shit leading up to it is really cool. These issues with Onslaught putting the whammy on Jean in a store with the "lol Xavier is like a father to you? Then check this memory out" moment, Juggernaut going to the mansion so Jean could help him, the whole vibe of a quiet evening in the x-mansion, no big villains, no big fights, and then bam, the "call was coming from inside the house", great stuff. And they had been sprinkling the name Onslaught for months too iirc, the whole thing was really well done.

Until the actual event of course >_>

Oh man, the nostalgia is real. The "WHO IS THE X-TRAITOR?" stuff had been going for YEARS. Every single letter in Essential X-Men (the UK reprint book) had some sort of weird theory, and then it turned out that
it was Xavier the whole time
. Like you said, the event was not good, but the build was great.

I miss mid 90s X-Men.
 
They've never really broken it down, sometimes the weekly notes in the old tp's mention who did what. My impression was Johns and Morrison did the bulk of the work as the book went on, with Morrison more on Booster Gold and Johns more on Black Adam. Renee is Rucka's favorite too.
 

Rhaknar

The Steam equivalent of the drunk friend who keeps offering to pay your tab all night.
Whatever happened to X-Man, the dude that crossed over from AoA?
 
Whatever happened to X-Man, the dude that crossed over from AoA?

He died, but he got better. He existed as residual psychic energy that caused a whole town to say "I am an X-Man." over and over again. Norman Osborn's Dark X-Men and the Dark Beast got involved. Cyclops' team rescued him and he lived on Utopia for a bit. Not sure about what happened after that.
 

CazTGG

Member
I don't get people who want comics to regress back to the 90s. It might just be an age thing though.

Also, people are starting to think that Marvel is hint at
undoing OMD
with Dead No More due to various recent references.

I thought the big hint was that
Uncle Ben and a bunch of other dead Spidey characters not named Ben Reilly would be coming back to life
due to that massive combined cover they revealed a while back.
 
Top Bottom