The argument being made, if I understand it, is that Marvel sort of already low-key did a New 52 sorta thing. A half-boot, where some continuity changed but not all, and the strings connecting everything got a lot weaker. I agree that Marvel doing a full blown reboot would be a mistake, part of what people love is that history, but the half measure isn't really any better, and is arguably worse.
I think Marvel is more likely to just retool what they have now than reboot.Is there even talk of a reboot from marvel? They should all be younger and get rid of all the marriages.
The many marriages.
man ya'll fuckin suck
like this community is tragic
Power Man and Iron Fist #6 was enjoyable, but it does feel weird reading a book where Danny and Luke talk about being tired with heroes fighting heroes while being a tie-in to a book about heroes fighting heroes.
Mine was only posted on at the weekend, so I'm still waiting on it. Hopefully in the next few days. Carrying on my reread while I wait. Finished up Hellboy, up to the fury, and reading hell on earth: gods and monsters this evening. So happy to hear you loved it though. Not that I lack confidence, but it's a difficult thing to stick, a finale 22ish years in the making!
Oh you guys are gonna love it for sure. Really excited to see what you think.Volume 2 comes out this week if I'm not mistaken, I'll grab it as soon as it's on CMX.
I'm all but caught up on BPRD, just waiting for the library to get in vol 14 of Hell on Earth. You're in for one hell of a ride friend.
Oh you guys are gonna love it for sure. Really excited to see what you think.
I have BPRD up to issue 142, so I'm a good 70 issues behind right now. Maybe this will motivate me to pick it back up. I'm so behind on all my comics :'(
Unrelated, but I just finished Gwenpool up to issue #4. I posted a little about it on Twitter but I'm not really feeling this. The writing just feels like a worse Squirrel Girl mixed with some Deadpool-esque humor and it just feels off. The art is cute, at least when Gurihiru does it, but that's pretty much all I liked here. I'm actually really disappointed considering how much praise I've read for this series in this community. It just feels kind of disjointed and ho-hum I guess. Feel like I should've just gone for something else instead.
I think Marvel is more likely to just retool what they have now than reboot.
So i just finished Ultimate Spider-Man on MU.. the Peter Parker version anyway. Overall I loved it, but it did have some filler and crap along the way. It left a lot of stories unfinished, lots of loose ends. But.. I feel like i missed an issue or five at the end.New Yorks underwater and then the comic just like.. ends with Kitty holding the mask. You dont even see him die, it was just Kitty and Jessica Drew rescuing people and then "Fin". Is there something I should have read instead?
Not sure if Spoiler tags are needed but you never know with some people.
An event called Ultimatum was happening at that time. The story you read continues in Ultimatum: Spider-Man Requiem and then a new ongoing titled Ultimate Comics Spider-Man.
Oh man next All-Star Batman storyline is Snyder and Jock doing Mister Freeze and as the one guy who likes Snyder's take on him from the Annual I could not be more excited.
An event called Ultimatum was happening at that time. The story you read continues in Ultimatum: Spider-Man Requiem and then a new ongoing titled Ultimate Comics Spider-Man.
I would give up Foolkiller, Solo and Hellcat for a Taskmaster series.
ALL NEW ULTIMATE MARVEL NOW!
Only had 3 books.
Everyone else died.
It would be interesting to see how they would approach Taskmaster in his own book. That character has been all over the place, though I vastly prefer him with a generous helping of humor and more than a little "IDGAF" 'tude.
I do wish they would announce books like the merc titles as minis. If they're hits, great, keep going. You don't even have to start a new volume. But plan for minis, please, so those of us who end up enjoying the six-or-so issues all of those books will probably get have something that feels complete and worth revisiting instead of a failure to launch.
I'm not assuming those books will turn out to be good by the way, merely allowing for the possibility. I AM assuming that none of them will be around in a year.
I really don't understand why people want the comics, that came first, to be exactly like the movies. I don't get it.Worst idea I've heard all year.
So they can easily jump in at the cost of everything else people like about the universe.I don't get why people want reboots.
BoomThe only way I'd want to read this thing is if it were no longer this thing.
I genuinely do not see how Secret Wars rebooted anything. All it did was eliminate some of the alternate timelines, and bring some remnants of those to the main Earth. Did it alter any backstories? Did it cause retcons? Because that's what everything DC did accomplished.The argument being made, if I understand it, is that Marvel sort of already low-key did a New 52 sorta thing. A half-boot, where some continuity changed but not all, and the strings connecting everything got a lot weaker. I agree that Marvel doing a full blown reboot would be a mistake, part of what people love is that history, but the half measure isn't really any better, and is arguably worse.
Ooooooooo I may have to check that out.Oh man next All-Star Batman storyline is Snyder and Jock doing Mister Freeze and as the one guy who likes Snyder's take on him from the Annual I could not be more excited.
Explain.but the half measure isn't really any better, and is arguably worse.
It's funny to me that anyone would even suggest that when we already have at least two major examples of characters being reduced, some might say ruined, by efforts to make them more like their movie counterparts: Nick Fury and Peter Quill. Not a lot of happy sentiment around here for the MCU-ification of Star-Lord.
The argument being made, if I understand it, is that Marvel sort of already low-key did a New 52 sorta thing. A half-boot, where some continuity changed but not all, and the strings connecting everything got a lot weaker. I agree that Marvel doing a full blown reboot would be a mistake, part of what people love is that history, but the half measure isn't really any better, and is arguably worse.
I'd say something snarky about all the great stories told with Nick Jr., but then I'd be lying about how awesome Kot's Secret Avengers was. Because it was super awesome.
I like Nick Jr. well enough. Peter is the glaring example for me.
I just checked the Hellboy wiki and he is a Byrne creation:
I don't read Rumble, but after seeing the creative team I probably should.
Got a nice DC haul today. Superman American Alien is a beautiful book.
Oh you guys are gonna love it for sure. Really excited to see what you think.
I have BPRD up to issue 142, so I'm a good 70 issues behind right now. Maybe this will motivate me to pick it back up. I'm so behind on all my comics :'(
.
Good morning.
Saw Gerads on Batman and squeed.
“If there’s one phrase I loathe, it’s the graphic novel. It is somebody sticking a label on something and saying they can’t call it comics as that’s for children … it is a label saying ‘this is for mature people’ – giving it another title to make it for grownups. [But] comics are literally for everyone, and there should be no labelling.”
I would give up Foolkiller, Solo and Hellcat for a Taskmaster series.
I just believe it is rather specious to say that a "half-boot" happened at all. One More Day/Brand New Day was more of a half-boot than Secret Wars. Okay, things happened a little differently in Spidey (a book I confess I don't pay any attention to). Origins shifting and being modernized isn't a new thing, it had zero effect on ASM, and it's a super low impact title anyway. Miles? What about him being in 616 implies a reboot of any sort?
What other evidence is there? I don't find either of those bits too compelling.
Read this this morning over breakfast: Click. It's about Charlie Adlard being awarded a spokesperson position, and one of his first bones of contention is the use of the term "Graphic Novel":
I thought it was quite interesting. Is this a thing? I can't say I've ever came across anyone who had these pre-conceived notions because of the term. It comes out of left field for me. I don't know if anyone else has any thoughts about it though? My own thoughts are really, does graphic novel mean anything anymore? Creators, readers etc all use it and all use it to mean different things at different times. Some times to denote a more serious work sure, sometimes to mean it's an original work like an OGN, sometimes people use it to simply described a collected trade paperback of a series. I don't know. It feels like the meaning is too broad and too much to different people to say it has this one negative connotation. I don't know. To tie it back in, if it doesn't mean much anymore, does it really matter what people call em?
I think it was more of an issue five years ago tbh. Lots of trades were rechristened "graphic novels" to get mainstream press legitimacy. But after all the biggest films in Hollywood started being based on comics I think this problem has kinda gone away to be honest.
I watched Blues Clues as an adult...with my kid, sure, but well before she knew any words. That show was the shit.
Muppet Babies, fuck yeah
Read this this morning over breakfast: Click. It's about Charlie Adlard being awarded a spokesperson position, and one of his first bones of contention is the use of the term "Graphic Novel":
I thought it was quite interesting. Is this a thing? I can't say I've ever came across anyone who had these pre-conceived notions because of the term. It comes out of left field for me. I don't know if anyone else has any thoughts about it though? My own thoughts are really, does graphic novel mean anything anymore? Creators, readers etc all use it and all use it to mean different things at different times. Some times to denote a more serious work sure, sometimes to mean it's an original work like an OGN, sometimes people use it to simply described a collected trade paperback of a series. I don't know. It feels like the meaning is too broad and too much to different people to say it has this one negative connotation. I don't know. To tie it back in, if it doesn't mean much anymore, does it really matter what people call em?
Who do I PM if I want to do the next Comics OT.
Do we really want people to think we are deviants who read Sonic and Transformers?
There are dozens of ways I can reply to this, so are you sure you want me to reply?
I need some recommendations crime/noir/detective type comics. The only experience I've had so far is Incognito by Brubaker.