• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Constance Wu says Matt Damon's Great Wall perpetuates 'racist myth'

Status
Not open for further replies.

lupinko

Member
Wait this movie has Matt Damon AND Andy Lau?

That's brilliant, also they both played the same character basically before. Lol ;)
 

Fury451

Banned
There's no irony here. Those who think so can't see the forest for the trees. It's still directly associated with a larger more deeply rooted problem in the film industry than just "hur hur this is a Chinese production hiring Matt Damon so it doesn't count!"

I don't think anyone is saying that there isn't a larger and pervasive problem here, just that this situation is a bit different than traditional Hollywood whitewashing.

And the fact that I can say "traditional Hollywood whitewashing" is the problem.
 

neojubei

Will drop pants for Sony.
I'm tired of the the white savior complex in films. A Chinese movie adding a white man as its lead to appeal to American audiences? Figures.

Yeah. Look what happened with the movie stonewall.

On a side note Netflix is going ahead with the Deathnote movie
 
Yeah, it's been a decade now and it's still getting regurgitated.

Samurai is plural for starters, and as for the white savior trope, Tom Cruise's character didn't save a damn thing, he only came to respect a culture.

I mean he tried to help a bit with modern strategy because you had white guys advising the other side as well, and it did nothing in the end.
Tom came to respect the old ways for the most part.
 

Zornack

Member
You have to think of it from the perspective of an Asian American. It can be vastly different than a minority living in their home country. When an Asian in their respective country looks at movies, the vast majority are from their respective movie industries, meaning they see tons of representation of themselves and similar faces. Yes, it's a globalized economy and Hollywood is large as well, but their perception is looking into the "Western cinema" as an outsider and assuming it reflects the demographics of Western countries.

For an Asian American they see it in reverse. While they identify with their home countries, their movie industry IS Hollywood and they see the lack of representation. That China has a movie industry where 99.9% of the actors are Chinese is irrelevant.

So despite you pointing out her being Asian American as some attempt at irony, that very fact is EXACTLY why she's in a more reasonable position to make these claims

I just can't get over the fact that an upper class American woman, born to a computer programmer and a university professor, is telling a Chinese born director whose first two jobs were as a farm hand and as textile worker to stop being racist and cast who she decides should be in the movie.

She needs to take a step back and look at the situation, not blindly criticize.
 

- J - D -

Member
Wait this movie has Matt Damon AND Andy Lau?

That's brilliant, also they both played the same character basically before. Lol ;)

A movie with both Leo Dicaprio and Tony Leung must happen!

Though I could probably do without a movie that had both Jack Nicholson and Eric Tsang.
 

milkham

Member
Perhaps, but they arent the root of the issue. They are a branch stemming out of it.

While I understand what Wu is grappling with (and you have to give her props for being so outspoken when she's got a career in the business) but I don't think this is the movie to jump on for these issues.

Yeah I'm trying to say that Chinese funding isn't some kind of "gotcha!" that invalidates her argument. If anything it just shows how deep the white savior trope goes.

I just can't get over the fact that an upper class American woman, born to a computer programmer and a university professor, is telling a Chinese born director whose first two jobs were as a farm hand and as textile worker to stop being racist and cast who she decides should be in the movie.

She needs to take a step back and look at the situation, not blindly criticize.

so she hasn't tasted enough poverty to have an opinion on movie casting?
 
I just can't get over the fact that an upper class American woman, born to a computer programmer and a university professor, is telling a Chinese born director whose first two jobs were as a farm hand and as textile worker to stop being racist and cast who she decides should be in the movie.

She needs to take a step back and look at the situation, not blindly criticize.

Still don't see the relevance in any of that. It's not like she's personally calling out the director. And it's not like her comments aren't 100% true

Answer this. Why is it that a Chinese movie firm looking for a big Hollywood actor chose Matt Damon of all people? Do you think if there were any Asian actors of comparable position they wouldn't have chosen them? And why aren't there any Asian actors who are close to being at Matt Damon's level of stardom?
 

Usobuko

Banned
The China citizens don't interact with the world as much using the Internet because several prominent sites are blocked by Chinese government.

They have their own equivalent google ( baidu ), reddit ( tie ba ), amazon ( alibaba ), youtube ( youku ), twittter ( weibo ), facebook ( qq ).

If the floodgates are open, then they can see that quite clearly, Asians do not hold the same equivalent standings as Whites. And then maybe they would understand why we, the other Asians that reside in this hemisphere too, want to see less of Hollywood whitewashing because such trends are just detrimental in all aspects.
 

ghst

thanks for the laugh
iunno, i won't deny the struggle, but i don't think this is the ground to pitch this battle on. especially if you write a carpal tunnel inducing facebook wall post.
 

iamblades

Member
The article says it's a co-production with Legendary Pictures.

Even if it were an all-Chinese production that just happened to have white Hollywood actors, it still looks mostly bad, or at the least, really cynical in the best light.

When it comes to international star power and bankability, the belief is still that that luxury is held primarily in the hands of white actors, save for maybe a Will Smith or Vin Diesel. Other than a few extremely rare cases, you ain't gonna see anyone's but a white face on these weird west/east productions.

Hollywood's pool of bankable Asian leads, the kind that can truly claim to have international appeal, is nonexistent.

This is more just that there are so few internationally bankable stars in this way, it's going to be hard to have a representative sample when the group is so small.

Maybe a dozen dudes that I can think of(maybe half a dozen women), of which Will Smith(arguable recently), the Rock and Vin Diesel(only when counting F&F movies) are 3 of. The others on the list are Cruise, Pitt, Damon, Affleck(maybe?), Clooney, probably Chris Pratt nowadays.

The last (maybe only?) asian actor to make that list was probably Jackie Chan at his peak.

Which is not to say there aren't structural issues, it's just that looking at the top level blockbuster that is intended for a global release you are dealing with an absolutely tiny sample size. There are maybe 20 of these types of films made per year, and they are probably all going to try and get one of those 12 dudes or 6 women.
 

UberLevi

Member
The film also perpetuates the myth that the Great Wall was built to keep out reptilian demons, but I guess Matt Damon being there is a bigger stretch.
 

Althane

Member
She's totally right. A damn shame that this "white savior" bullshit still persists.

Has a plot summary or more detail than the short trailer that I saw been shown? Because I keep seeing "White Savior", but one of the writers is the same guy that did The Last Samurai, which (as noted previously in this topic) gets hammered for being "White Savior" when it really isn't.
 
American isn't a race

No, but Chinese people are? The OP's point is that it's a racist trope for the enlightened westerner to talk down to lesser ethnicities of color, in this instance claiming that the Chinese don't know the right way to cast a Chinese film in a way which protects the dignity of the Chinese people.
 

- J - D -

Member
Which is not to say there aren't structural issues, it's just that looking at the top level blockbuster that is intended for a global release you are dealing with an absolutely tiny sample size. There are maybe 20 of these types of films made per year, and they are probably all going to try and get one of those 12 dudes or 6 women.

I'd argue that that is subject to change as China progressively becomes a larger presence in the global film industry, so the casting and all of the discussions about the diversity therein for these types of productions should be considered an issue of growing importance, especially if they all find root in Hollywood's own diversity issue(s). I don't necessarily disagree with the rest of your post.
 
Great-Wall-EW-Damon.jpg
 

Zoe

Member
This is similar to FFXV getting progressively whitewashed over the years to have greater appeal.
 

Althane

Member
No, but Chinese people are? The OP's point is that it's a racist trope for the enlightened westerner to talk down to lesser ethnicities of color, in this instance claiming that the Chinese don't know the right way to cast a Chinese film in a way which protects the dignity of the Chinese people.

To be fair, I don't think the Chinese constitute their own race, they're more of a nationality.

Then again, there's a billion of 'em, so... eh?
 
No?

My point is that it is racist for an American to step in and think they have a better idea of how a Chinese production should cast their movie.
Uh, no. People from everywhere in the world can judge the racism of anyone anywhere in the world, given sufficient information.
 
It's a Hollywood company owned by Chinese money producing a Chinese movie directed by a Chinese director starring a Hollywood man who has huge international BO draw. She need to get some perspective.

In fact this kind of collaboration is extremely common between Asia coproductions.
 
Just out of curiosity, was there any "white savior" backlash to Netflix's Marco Polo?

I just get the feeling there's absolutely no right way to do it, even when a film subverts the trope (like Last Samurai) it still gets blamed for perpetuating the problem, so what's the solution? I've never heard anyone mention it when it comes to Marco Polo (I'd imagine it's out there though) but there is a right way to do it, and we know almost nothing about the content of this movie, for all we know Matt Damon gets crushed by a monster in the opening 30 minutes, so much for our white savior.

Just a bit early to jump the gun in my opinion.
 

Renekton

Member
Uh, no. People from everywhere in the world can judge the racism of anyone anywhere in the world, given sufficient information.
You have every right to do so.

But it does feel super weird that white people are being outraged on our behalf. Not sure about ABCs though, we kinda no-true-Scotsman-ed them haha.
 
This is a pretty difficult subject to broach.

If you're a Chinese film production looking to attract an international audience, of which the United States has traditionally been the most lucrative, you have to go with what sells. I think that's basically what this boils down to! Why do white actors continue to have a disproportionate share of roles in big Hollywood movies is a totally different question. If I had to hazard a guess, I would say that historically the global box office has been dominated by countries with a majority white population, and in which the white population holds the most disposable income. I don't know if racism was institutionalized in Hollywood, but even if it wasn't it was in society at large leaving minorities without representation. Hollywood has to sell films to the largest audience, and for most of history that has been white people with the money to spend on movies and merchandise. They aren't going to go out of their way to bankroll movies to appeal to Asians or any other minority group if they only represent a small portion of society and don't have the disposable income to justify the investment. In the case of this movie, the Chinese production company knows what sells on the global stage, and most importantly what sells in America, and took an actor that will appeal to that audience.

EDIT: Also this isn't, "Matt Damon's Great Wall" I think that title would more appropriately go to the director or the studio producing it.
 

HStallion

Now what's the next step in your master plan?
I was just looking at imdb before reading your post, I thought the image they had up for it was pretty funny. Sure its not going to be the final poster or whatever but

Wait I know what the M. Night shyamalanesque twist will be now, thanks to this poster. Its all a big mindfuck. Any Lau man's the Great Wall to keep something out... and that was MATT DAMON!!!
 

JeTmAn81

Member
Chinese heroes are "Malala, Gandhi, Mandela"? Uh...those people aren't Chinese. Is she really trying to say that Chinese people only admire non-whites? I'm no fan of the white savior trope myself but she seems off her nut here.
 

D i Z

Member
The director is somehow exempt from her accusations of racism?

She didn't call him out. Get over it. She's looking for anyone to have the stones to step up and take the challenge of doing it right for once.

No?

My point is that it is racist for an American to step in and think they have a better idea of how a Chinese production should cast their movie.

1) This has already covered. Nationality, not race.

2) Hollywood production company. Doesn't matter who owns it. It's written and produced by the Hollywood machine.

3) She's absolutely right. Besides, from her professional and personal position she's in exactly the right place to be speaking up about this. Not a lot of people can or would.

Chinese heroes are "Malala, Gandhi, Mandela"? Uh...those people aren't Chinese. Is she really trying to say that Chinese people only admire non-whites? I'm no fan of the white savior trope myself but she seems off her nut here.


You really didn't stop to think about what all of those people have in common, did you?
Take a moment, google if need be. Then come back when you've grasped why they would be held in high regard by a people living with a legacy of communist rule and suppression.
Now contrast that with the unspoken rules of how the white savior trope works, and why it exists.
 
Our heroes don't look like Matt Damon. They look like Malala. Ghandi. Mandela.
Huh.

This seems blind to some of realities of inter-national politics. I'm actually really curious what the domestic reaction in China would have been if they casted a non-Chinese POC instead of Damon. Like a Ken Watanabe or Daniel Kim.

Anyways, I wouldn't mind Damon's addition if what we've seen/heard so far didn't seem phoned in. I'm interested to see what happens with his performance.
 

Althane

Member
Huh.

This seems blind to some of realities of inter-national politics. I'm actually really curious what the domestic reaction in China would have been if they casted a non-Chinese POC instead of Damon.

Anyways, I wouldn't mind Damon's addition if what we've seen/heard so far didn't seem phoned in. I'm interested to see what happens with his performance.

Makes me wonder how it would've been received if it had been a Japanese or Vietnamese actor, instead of Damon.

Not on the Western side of the world (poorly, most likely), but in China.
 
Huh.

This seems blind to some of realities of inter-national politics. I'm actually really curious what the domestic reaction in China would have been if they casted a non-Chinese POC instead of Damon.

Anyways, I wouldn't mind Damon's addition if what we've seen/heard so far didn't seem phoned in. I'm interested to see what happens with his performance.


I don't think it's blind to it. In fact, early in here I voiced my thoughts on how those very politics are the part of the reason for her comments.

You have to think of it from the perspective of an Asian American. It can be vastly different than a minority living in their home country. When an Asian in their respective country looks at movies, the vast majority are from their respective movie industries, meaning they see tons of representation of themselves and similar faces. Yes, it's a globalized economy and Hollywood is large as well, but their perception is looking into the "Western cinema" as an outsider and assuming it reflects the demographics of Western countries.

For an Asian American they see it in reverse. While they identify with their home countries, their movie industry IS Hollywood and they see the lack of representation. That China has a movie industry where 99.9% of the actors are Chinese is irrelevant.

So despite you pointing out her being Asian American as some attempt at irony, that very fact is EXACTLY why she's in a more reasonable position to make these claims
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom