So basically every kind of food will eventually give me cancer
What about rapeseed oil, is what we use.
ok, so how safe is Canola?
Seed- and vegetable oils are generally unhealthy. Conventionally produced rapeseed/canola oil is no exception.
If you can get your hands on organic, cold-pressed canola oil, then it wont be as high in oxidized fats and trans fats, so I suppose it is fine to consume.
But I definitely wouldnt make it a large percentage of calories and I would definitely NOT cook with it, as it is still too high in polyunsaturated fats.
Conventional canola oil (which is what most people are consuming) is low in nutrients, high in oxidized Omega-6 fats, high in trans fats and the Omega-3s happen to be in an inefficient form.
Overall, canola oil is not as bad as other vegetable oils (like soybean oil), but it is still far from being healthy. You would do much better eating olive oil or coconut oil instead.
When in doubt, keep this golden rule in mind: Nature doesnt make bad fats, factories do! Dr. Cate Shanahan
If you want to learn more about which cooking oils to eat and which to avoid, then read this article here: Healthy Cooking Oils The Ultimate Guide.
Damn, you people collect the seed from rape?What about rapeseed oil, is what we use.
Not included in the study but here's a primer with scientific references:
Also canola and rapeseed are the same thing.
http://authoritynutrition.com/canola-oil-good-or-bad/
Butter and olive oil is all i use.
Canola isn't really the same thing as rapeseed. It's a selectively bred variety of rapeseed intended to produce an oil-usable seed without the bad parts of rapeseed oil.
Aside from deep frying, I cook almost exclusively with olive oil, so this doesn't effect me much...
Now when they say THAT causes cancer, I'm gonna be upset.
Im not a fan of the taste of coconut oil(I hate coconut)
Are they all like that or are there any 'no flavor' coconut oils?
Is there anything that doesn't give you cancer
I'm gonna stick to sucking my underpants, I have yet to see a link to cancer being mentioned for it.
Is there anything that doesn't give you cancer
Food science is the worst.
So virtually everything causes cancer, and if it doesn't it probably gives you heart failure, lung failure, or a stroke?
Once again...whats good for you today, us bad for you tomorrow. And vice versa.
Food science is the worst.
"leading scientists"
Experts
Studies
Polls
FZZpure says these threads are becoming malarkey
''evolution'' I thought that's been common knowledge, but it seems like the word science has an deterring effect to some.Food science is worst science.
This has been suspected for a very long time and is written about in plenty of books, especially those that advocate the paleo/natural/organic/whole foods-leaning lifestyle.
I stick with lard, butter, olive oil and coconut oil myself, depending on what I'm cooking. They are all great fats and very stable if not exposed to unreasonable heat.
Really have no reason to experiment with strange oils that have to go through a dozen and one industrial processes before they reach store shelves, like canola/rapeseed oil, for example.
If this stuff really can be linked to cancer as is expected, it means bad things for people who live on food they don't cook themselves. Canola, sunflower, and soybean oil are pretty much universally used in processed foods and restaurants these days.
Naturalistic fallacy in the bolded. This is like saying you'll opt for herbal remedies before ever stepping foot into a hospital. The oil needing to be processed before reaching store shelves doesn't make it inherently bad for you. But you imply that it is. Instead you should use actual evidence to make your case rather than relying on feels.
Also I love the implication that people who cook for themselves don't use vegetable oils.
And red meat also is known to have cancer causing chemicals.
Hi, CornBurrito.
We have an increasing body of evidence and I expect we'll only see more.
It's not a naturalistic fallacy to say that it's not a bad idea to stick with what we know is good.
Also, there was no implication that people who cook for themselves don't use vegetable oils. Most people probably do, since that's what they've been told is good for them for a long time now.
...when cooked at high temperatures.
It is naturalistic fallacy when you imply that things are bad because they are processed and that things are automatically good when unprocessed.
You'll need to provide evidence for each individual processed item, and each individual unprocessed item.
In this instance we have some evidence that processed vegetable oils may be bad for you. But you're piggybacking off legitimate evidence to make the unfounded claims that all processed things are bad and all unprocessed things are good.
And what exactly are high temperatures in this case? When I stir fry something at medium high on my stove is that high temperature? If I cook a roast in the oven at 400 is that high temperature?
We don't know what causes cancer, therefore everything causes cancer.
i use coconut oil, olive oil and butter(some times avocado oil)... how do i keep getting lucky with this shit... I'm the fucking bomb.
Do not worry, you will die in a few years. You will be stabbed by a man wearing nothing but pants on his head with shit running down his leg. Said man may or may not be a eunuch high on bath salts. The police will then deliver the fatal shot to you and 4 other bystanders while firing 102 bullets in the general direction of the man.
It is naturalistic fallacy when you imply that things are bad because they are processed and that things are automatically good when unprocessed.
You'll need to provide evidence for each individual processed item, and each individual unprocessed item.
In this instance we have some evidence that processed vegetable oils may be bad for you. But you're piggybacking off legitimate evidence to make the unfounded claims that all processed things are bad and all unprocessed things are good.
And what exactly are high temperatures in this case? When I stir fry something at medium high on my stove is that high temperature? If I cook a roast in the oven at 400 is that high temperature?
That's it....I'm eating nothing but steamed vegetables forever.
And what exactly are high temperatures in this case? When I stir fry something at medium high on my stove is that high temperature? If I cook a roast in the oven at 400 is that high temperature?
So... we basically can't use any form of oil then?
Indirect versus direct heat cooking methods.
Sautéing/Frying is a direct heat type of cooking method. The oil is heated by fire or an heating element through a vessel like a saute pan. Or the case of deep frying, a dutch oven or cast iron skillet.
The oil itself gets heated to high temperatures.
Roasting is indirected heat, which is why you rarely need extra fat. The oil or fat rarely reaches high temperature via roasting.
I'm eating nothing but vegetables fried in goose and duck and beef fat, forever.
350+ is high temperature for frying. Anything below 300 for frying and you may as well be boiling it in water. Baking temps are different of course because of the heating/contact method.
Olive oil starts to smoke at 350+, Rapeseed can stay clear up to 450 degrees at which point it also starts smoking like a bastard.
Olive!
It is naturalistic fallacy when you imply that things are bad because they are processed and that things are automatically good when unprocessed.