Being alive causes cancer.
Is it possible that eating cancer cures cancer?
I thought it's been known for a while that vegetable oils are really bad stuff? Not sure why that would turn science on its head.
Coincidentally that's the same kind of oil Skullface was covered in when he was burned and disfigured for life.
such a lust for carcinogens in your red meat? Whoooooooo?
My favorite part of the steak is the crusty rind, filled with high temperature cancer goodness. high temps are high temps. with indirect heat, only a portion is exposed to high temps. roasts aren't going to be a big worry. If you like gnawing on burnt ends from the broiler, you may have something to think about.
We figured out how to eat hundreds of thousands of years ago. It's called not eating food from boxes and not eating grains or most legumes, obviously including any liquid not called coffee, tea or water.
Your definition of cancer is too broad, when it appears that you're mainly referring to colorectal and breast cancers. Melanoma (a cancer treated by general surgeons) and head&neck cancers are absolutely attributed to lifestyle habits.As a nurse on a gi/gen surg floor, I can honestly say that it seems like getting cancer/not getting cancer is basically a crap shoot.
There is often times no rhyme or reason to it and VERY rarely can it be attributed definitively to lifestyle habits.
Genetics is a more prominent predictor.
Don't worry about concrete numbers. Enjoy your beef however you want. Just get your colonoscopy at age 50 and pray to your deity of choice that you don't have cancer. Doesn't get simpler than that.I'm not roasting my beef. I'm usually stir frying it. Nothing burnt. So does that mean it isn't carcinogenic? "High heat" is meaningless to me. A candle won't cook my steak but it can burn my finger. That's high heat to me. I need actual concrete numbers for this shit.
Not included in the study but here's a primer with scientific references:
Also canola and rapeseed are the same thing.
http://authoritynutrition.com/canola-oil-good-or-bad/
Hydrogenized forms. You can get fresh lard, which is not.Eating grains is unavoidable for most of the world, and likely for most of the US. We wouldn't be able to support this large a population without them.
Also I've seen very little (if any) evidence that rice is harmful. You may be able to build a case around wheat or corn. And especially wheat that isn't whole wheat.
edit: Isn't lard full of trans fats?
Is there anything that doesn't cause cancer?
Let's just eat raw mud and grass and rocks.
Isn't lard full of trans fats?
Is Lard the same thing as margirine? I don't think we have Lard in Scandinavia!
These vegetable oils are a relatively new invention and they were highly processed in factories with added chemicals. It's not a reach to say highly processed food is usually bad for human beings.
This is nothing new and has been known for decades, if not an entire century. Oils that contain unsaturation are inherently less oxidatively stable. When the double bond oxidizes, it creates peroxides, when the peroxides oxidize further, it creates anisidine like compounds such as aldehydes and ketones. Aldehyde and ketone containing compounds, particularly low molecular weight compounds, have been shown to be carcinogenic.
Olive oil is not exactly the best oil in terms of stability, a high oleic sunflower oil, high erucic rape (canola oil), palm oil, animal fat, or interesterified fat (crisco/margarine) are much more stable.
The amount of "processing" does not contribute to this in any meaningful way as long as the crude oil was of good quality to begin with... Actually, processed oils are much more stable as they remove pro-oxidants such as phosphatides, color bodies, and other minor components. Anti-oxidants also become pro-oxidants in large enough quantities, typically above 2500 ppm or so (using alpha-tocopherol) for example.
I would like to know what added chemicals are present in processed oils. Oil processing is more about removing unwanted components then adding things... In a process such as margarine production, it is just modifying the distribution of FA's among triglyceride species, but not "adding chemicals"
Hydrogenized forms. You can get fresh lard, which is not.
It you see lard on a shelf, it's hydrogenized like Crisco.
What about Margarine?
Margarine is made from vegetable oil.
I'm not roasting my beef. I'm usually stir frying it. Nothing burnt. So does that mean it isn't carcinogenic? "High heat" is meaningless to me. A candle won't cook my steak but it can burn my finger. That's high heat to me. I need actual concrete numbers for this shit.
Don't think I've seen fresh lard at any store then. All Crisco.
For what it is worth, I use olive oil most often. Probably followed by coconut oil. I use vegetable oil if the recipe calls for it. And I'm sure a lot of my snacks use vegetable oils. But I'd wither away to nothing if I gave up junk food. I'm underweight enough as it is.
You can also render your own lard from fat back.
Aint nobody got time for that.
Everyone has time for it, just save bacon grease.
It's not news. I mean, this study might be new, but highly processed vegetable oils being bad has been known for a long time.
Olive oil, coconut oil and butter being the best choices has always been the recommendation to those who has been keeping up.