I saw the link from the oxford guy above. Guess it really depends on what you mean by herd immunity - if you hit 99% either vaccinated or recovered from an infection, I think that 1% will be pretty unlikely to come in contact with someone with a transmissible infection in day to day life.Herd immunity is possible with other viruses but it is impossible with coronaviruses. That is because the coronavirus can jump from human to animal and back.
Yeah, he should’ve called them stupid assholes who deserve to die. That would’ve definitely worked. Or at the very least it would’ve satisfied this weird fascination with being a cunt to people by flexing moral superiority. It certainly would’ve accomplished that if nothing else.he was nice and polite to everyone, I bet he changed everyone’s mind
Yeah, he should’ve called them stupid assholes who deserve to die. That would’ve definitely worked. Or at the very least it would’ve satisfied this weird fascination with being a cunt to people by flexing moral superiority. It certainly would’ve accomplished that if nothing else.
At least it was outdoors though. Outdoor events aren't a danger!^its kind of like our own special Olympics
Percentage increases don't say that much. If you get your state back to zero cases and one case is reported that's an increase of infinite percent. Every state had an infinite percent rise at one point in 2020 with their first cases.![]()
South Dakota Leads U.S. in COVID Case Increase, With 312 Percent Rise
South Dakota's rising rates come just over a week after the end of the10-day Sturgis Motorcycle Rally, which was attended by an estimated 525,000 people.www.newsweek.com
Fucking idiots. The exact same thing happened last year. They learned nothing. Either that or they just didn't care.
According to Nancy Pelosi and her lavish donor gathering I just saw, none were wearing masks other than the lowly staff and crowded together. She is super catholic so her faith with protect her I’m sureAt least it was outdoors though. Outdoor events aren't a danger!
Or something like that. I forget how the excuse goes.
According to Nancy Pelosi and her lavish donor gathering I just saw, none were wearing masks other than the lowly staff and crowded together. She is super catholic so her faith with protect her I’m sure
It’s not hard to tell which people are stupidly playing politics. For any rational intelligent person, something that is demonstrably dumb by someone in one party is equally as dumb when committed by someone in the other. Politics have no place in a public health crisis.That is also incredibly stupid. Stupidity is not exclusive to any political spectrum.
And neither does race, but we seem to keep going down that road as well every once and while for some reason.It’s not hard to tell which people are stupidly playing politics. For any rational intelligent person, something that is demonstrably dumb by someone in one party is equally as dumb when committed by someone in the other. Politics have no place in a public health crisis.
Did you form this opinion with input from the experts you don't trust or the experts you do trust?Herd immunity is possible with other viruses but it is impossible with coronaviruses. That is because the coronavirus can jump from human to animal and back.
You might be right. But you’re operating on assumption there. “Probably” is not a substitute for actual data.This one is misleading. They are comparing breakthrough infections from the delta variant with unvaccinated infections in early 2020 when the delta variant didn't exist in Vietnam yet. The first case of the delta variant in Vietnam wasn't detected until April 2021.
The viral load of the delta variant is orders of magnitudes higher than previous variants, so even vaccinated people infected with the delta variant would probably still experience higher viral loads compared to unvaccinated people last year infected with the original strain or alpha.
What substitute? That is the data. It's in figure 2 of the original paper https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3897733You might be right. But you’re operating on assumption there. “Probably” is not a substitute for actual data.
Because so many anti-vaxers are just stupid.Why is it that so many people who justify their anti-vaccination position do so with bad math?
Why is it that so many people who justify their anti-vaccination position do so with bad math?
you pick and choose. it's the "do your own research" buffet ( ´◡‿ゝ◡`)Did you form this opinion with input from the experts you don't trust or the experts you do trust?
This is what I’m focusing on:What substitute? That is the data. It's in figure 2 of the original paper https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3897733
We have observed delta infections have as much as 1000 times the viral loads of previous strains. The CDC has said that viral loads in breakthough delta cases are similar to unvaccinated cases, and the data from Singapore shows that to be true at least in the early days.
If anything, the fact that the breakthrough delta infection viral loads are not 1000 times more should be a good sign in favor of the vaccine's efficacy.
There appears to be some discrepancy between what studies are showing for the viral load of the delta variant. Here is Reuters saying it’s 300x based on a South Korean study. The article didn’t say whether those were breakthrough infections or not.
Breakthrough Delta variant infections are associated with high viral loads,
44 prolonged PCR positivity, and low levels of vaccine-induced neutralizing antibodies,
45 explaining the transmission between the vaccinated people. Physical distancing measures
46 remain critical to reduce SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant transmission.
Professor [of Medicine at Stanford University] Jay Bhattacharya is one of the famous voices to have emerged out of the pandemic. A vocal critic of lockdowns, his name became synonymous with the controversial Great Barrington Declaration, which called for an “alternative approach to the pandemic” that would entail no lockdowns. Along with co-signatories Sunetra Gupta and Martin Kulldforff, the trio argued that public health strategies should instead centre on the ‘focused protection’ of at-risk groups while keeping society as open as possible so the healthy parts of the population could build herd immunity. The declaration triggered a huge global debate, with critics arguing that many more lives would have been lost on account of the difficulty of shielding all those who were vulnerable. During this week’s interview, Freddie Sayers challenged Prof Bhattacharya on what would have happened if his strategy was adopted, whether he has changed his mind in retrospect, and how his ‘focused protection’ have would worked with waning immunity and new variants?
and bad literary references
What about it? This is why the tweet is misleading because it's implying that the cause for the 251-fold increase in viral loads is the vaccine, when in fact it is most likely because the delta strain has a higher viral load in general, and when the study made no such implication between a link between the vaccination itself and higher viral loads. Breakthrough infections are associated with low levels of vaccine-induced antibodies which would suggest that for whatever reason, some people's vaccination protection wasn't that good, or it waned over time. Everyone's different, so things like that can happen.This is what I’m focusing on:
There appears to be some discrepancy between what studies are showing for the viral load of the delta variant. Here is Reuters saying it’s 300x based on a South Korean study. The article didn’t say whether those were breakthrough infections or not.
![]()
Delta cases show 300 times higher viral load - S.Korea study
People infected with the more transmissible Delta variant have a viral load 300 times higher than those with the original version of the COVID-19 virus, when symptoms are first observed, a South Korea study found.www.reuters.com
However here is them referencing a Chinese study that does say 1000x
![]()
People with allergic reaction to mRNA vaccines can get 2nd dose; Delta viral load over 1,000 times higher
The following is a roundup of some of the latest scientific studies on the novel coronavirus and efforts to find treatments and vaccines for COVID-19.www.reuters.com
The tweet is the tweet. But your statement saying well delta has 1,000x viral loads for unvaccinated vs 250x viral for vaccinated people isn’t really painting the whole picture either. There is one study that says delta infections are 300x. That’s a relatively wide range 300 to 1000. We have one study here on breakthrough shows infections. It’s not entirely unlikely we could see a similarly large range as more studies are done. So it’s hard to say at the point.What about it? This is why the tweet is misleading because it's implying that the cause for the 251-fold increase in viral loads is the vaccine, when in fact it is most likely because the delta strain has a higher viral load in general, and when the study made no such implication between a link between the vaccination itself and higher viral loads. Breakthrough infections are associated with low levels of vaccine-induced antibodies which would suggest that for whatever reason, some people's vaccination protection wasn't that good, or it waned over time. Everyone's different, so things like that can happen.
If there was data that suggests unvaccinated people with delta have lower viral loads than vaccinated people with delta, that would support the tweet, but there is none of that. In fact, the data that is out there now shows that viral loads are similar in both groups at the outset, and are lesser in vaccinated groups as time goes on.
So you recall the other day I had a run-in with my first proper anti-vax campaigner? Today I had my first proper run-in with a genuine COVID denier. Claims the entire pandemic has been set up by the worlds govermments as a means to initiate a global culling of the worlds population. I didn't know how to respond to that.
That's not what I said.But your statement saying well delta has 1,000x viral loads for unvaccinated vs 250x viral for vaccinated people
A study conducted by Chinese researchers that has yet to be peer-reviewed found that people infected with the delta variant had viral loads that were up to 1,260 times higher than the viral loads of individuals infected with the original strain that circulated in 2020.
Although the assay used in this investigation was not validated to provide quantitative results, there was no significant difference between the Ct values of samples collected from breakthrough cases and the other cases. This might mean that the viral load of vaccinated and unvaccinated persons infected with SARS-CoV-2 is also similar. However, microbiological studies are required to confirm these findings.
- Fully vaccinated people with Delta variant breakthrough infections can spread the virus to others. However, vaccinated people appear to be infectious for a shorter period: Previous variants typically produced less virus in the body of infected fully vaccinated people (breakthrough infections) than in unvaccinated people. In contrast, the Delta variant seems to produce the same high amount of virus in both unvaccinated and fully vaccinated people. However, like other variants, the amount of virus produced by Delta breakthrough infections in fully vaccinated people also goes down faster than infections in unvaccinated people. This means fully vaccinated people are likely infectious for less time than unvaccinated people.
PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values were similar between both vaccinated and unvaccinated groups at diagnosis, but viral loads decreased faster in vaccinated individuals. Early, robust boosting of anti-spike protein antibodies was observed in vaccinated patients, however, these titers were significantly lower against B.1.617.2 as compared with the wildtype vaccine strain.
Conclusion The mRNA vaccines are highly effective at preventing symptomatic and severe COVID-19 associated with B.1.617.2 infection. Vaccination is associated with faster decline in viral RNA load and a robust serological response. Vaccination remains a key strategy for control of COVID-19 pandemic.
Yes I know, but that's irrelevant to the point I'm making, because my point doesn't hinge on the exact value of the multiplier in either vaccinated or unvaccinated groups. My point only hinges on the fact that delta viral loads are in general greater than the variants from last year.There is one study that says delta infections are 300x. That’s a relatively wide range 300 to 1000. We have one study here on breakthrough shows infections. It’s not entirely unlikely we could see a similarly large range as more studies are done. So it’s hard to say at the point.
I think so too, which is why I'm using what I know and what's been demonstrated by data to show that the tweet in question is misleading and trying to paint a picture of the vaccinations that the cited study itself is not even saying.I think we should stick to what we know.
You should ask your friend to cross check his insider information with his uncle who works at Nintendo.I have this friend and he's got a sister that works in the european burocracy. He said his sister told him that everyone in the european instituions believe/knows this was intentional by the chinese to cull their older population.
I found the whole convo very odd.
Please tell me your friend's sister doesn't believe it.I have this friend and he's got a sister that works in the european burocracy. He said his sister told him that everyone in the european instituions believe/knows this was intentional by the chinese to cull their older population.
I found the whole convo very odd.
You should ask your friend to cross check his insider information with his uncle who works at Nintendo.
Please tell me your friend's sister doesn't believe it.
I wasn't implying you were lying. Apologies if it came across that way.I've known this guy for years and see him often. I doubt he's making shit up - he comes from a family that has a lot of people in academia, business, high civil servants, etc.
I am not even saying this is true, just that bureocrats in the european union believe it is.
It's not necessarily about your level of confidence in him. There's several layers of hearsay at work.I've known this guy for years and see him often. I doubt he's making shit up - he comes from a family that has a lot of people in academia, business, high civil servants, etc.
I am not even saying this is true, just that bureocrats in the european union believe it is.
I wasn't implying you were lying. Apologies if it came across that way.
I can believe the EU thinking it was man-made in China. Hell, even Trump referred to it as 'The China Virus' every time he spoke about Covid, so it wouldn't surprise me if his European counterparts followed suit.
It's not necessarily about your level of confidence in him. There's several layers of hearsay at work.
1. You have to accept that your friend didn't mishear or is making shit up or is interpreting the information wrong.
2. You have to accept that your friend's sister didn't mishear or is making shit up or is interpreting the information wrong.
3. You have to accept that "everyone" is an accurate description of whom his sister is speaking to. I doubt she talked to "everyone" about this issue.
The game of telephone is a tricky one with two participants, let alone 3 or more.
What? The level of confidence decreases the more levels there are in a second-hand chain of information. That's the case for anything.Come on...
What? The level of confidence decreases the more levels there are in a second-hand chain of information. That's the case for anything.
Your friend could be totally right. However, wouldn't your confidence level be higher if "everyone" in the European institutions told you this directly? As opposed to hearing this second hand from your friend who heard about this second hand, from his sister who heard about this second hand?