LOL, you want to go a few rounds on this? Alright, lets go.
You cited Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905). If you were being completely honest here, you would have used the whole quote which states "It related to compulsory vaccination, and the law was held valid as a proper exercise of the police powers with reference to the public health. It was stated in the opinion that it was a case "of an adult who, for aught that appears, was himself in perfect health and a fit [*56] subject for vaccination, and yet, while remaining in the community, refused to obey the statute and the regulation adopted in execution of its provisions for the protection of the public health and the public safety, confessedly endangered by the presence of a dangerous disease." Lochner v. New York, 198 U.S. 45, 55-56
Moreover, the vaccination in question was for SMALL POX. According to wiki had a 30% mortality rate. See contra (Covid with less than 1% mortality rate). That is orders of magnitude different than the situation we have with Covid.
Thats not even getting into the other cases that distinguish Jacobson.
So shove that clean up your pipe on that citation. I never said the state CAN'T do it, I said that they shouldn't for lots of different reasons...including following the precedent you cited.