Refreshment.01
Member
Crunched, AI in all Crysis games is comparable, that´s what experience tells me after playing the sh!t out of Cry1 and Warhead for years. The enviroments the AI is navigating is the key difference. Just think why would the AI get downgraded if its based on the same engine?Crunched said:I don't think it's excused just because it's content to stand just outside of the shit pile. I'd say FEAR, the Halo series, and Crysis 1 all have better AI. Can't think of anything else, but that's because I can't think of another FPS that has enemies who possess anything remotely resembling intelligence. Crysis 2 at least has creatures that seem to be slightly aware they have roles to play. They are like two steps away from the right on The Evolution of Man; they see these things called grenades. "What is this?" they think. Silly monkeys.
Haven't played much of it, but STALKER seemed to have solid AI as well.
AI in Crysis 2 is adequate but its hampered by stupid bugs, biggest one is getting stuck in obstacles. Infact theres one or two little new things it does in this game. Of the popular games only Fear and Halo are leaps above everything else, the rest is either worst or in the same league as Crysis 2.
Yep, it seems you aren't very familiar with Stalker AI. First 2 games even with patches and complete don't save the stupid AI. Best AI in the series comes from Call of Prypiat, specially when a patrol is searching in a close enviroment. Behaviour is not more complex than Crysis 2 but at least they don't usually get stuck.
Please, make some examples of these aproaches. I'm not saying it isn´t the case just want to know which ones you are thinking of.Nekrono said:I just think the game could have been much better in every aspect, and there are some obvious decisions and approaches they had to make just to 'appeal' a broader audience (and get more sales obviously) that i just wish they wouldn't have made but w/e we can't get all that we want.
But the reality is that even Crysis 1 was a "broader audience shooter" like you put it. Its not as complex as other FPS or hybrids you get on PC, for example, Stalker, System Shock or Deus EX to name some of them.
To be fair man the bolded ones are genre defining or influential shooters. Crysis 1 wasn´t neither so expecting the sequel to do that was unrealistic. Crysis 1 was a solid game with revolutionary tech but not gameplay.Lime said:You have got to be kidding me...
Deus Ex
Half-life
Half-life 2
DOOM
Call of Duty 1 + 4
Halo: CE
Crysis 1
Unreal
Goldeneye
Vampire: The Masquerade
System Shock 2
Call of Juarez: Bound in Blood
Rainbow Six
etc.
The other ones are your taste, hell FarCry 1 deserves the spot more than Crysis 1 and you didnt considere it.
By today standars? Maybe. Back in the day it was good and somewhat exotic, it had a very different setting for a shooter.DennisK4 said:Surely you are the one kidding?
Goldeneye? Shit campaign