What the morons at reeee dont understand is that its a politically charged game, but not our politics. It doesnt have anything to do with our own politics (which is a sad fucking shitshow anyway). But ofcoufse the game itself has many political standpoints which is logical.
The problem is that the term political has been taken to encompass almost all of reality, the point at which it would become meaningless.
I won't spend 60 bucks to be lectured upon by a studio, especially when, as a medium, videogames are probably one of the worst places to entertain a serious in-depth philosophical discussion.
The game can depict scenarios that raise questions and let the player make up their own mind, which is what TW3 seems to have managed to do so well and been rewarded for it sales wise.
Usually people who defend games should be political do so as long as the developer sides with their political view. I hope games CAN be political if the developer wants to go that way, but saying they SHOULD, in my opinion, is to limit their creative freedom. It's a good thing CD Projekt are making the game they want to make.
Exactly.
My experience has been that, often, people who claim all games are political, but never substantiate their claim, or people who claim games should be political, have a very specific brand of politics in mind: their own.
yada yada yada what is it with CD Red and catering to angry gamer culture?
Oh, I see now.
CDPR standing by the original plot and quests and recorded VA and not changing a thing to accommodate recent real-world events is now being described as "catering to angry gamer culture".
Just so you know, creative writing doesn't change reality.
I've saved the best posts for last:
A not political Cyberpunk story? Worst thing I've heard about this gamd
Do they even understand their genre at all?
Of course they don't. Mike Pondsmith is consulting, but obviously not on lore or worldbuilding. No, he is a fashion consultant, specializing in cyber-underwear.
If only CDPR would have requested your services, this game might have stood a chance.
I take Pawel Sasko's statement to mean the game's message won't be along the lines of an overt opinionated thesis or statement such as "Capitalism is evil, Socialism smells like rosewater" or "You should riot till corporations come crashing down". I think he uses "political", "statement" and "thesis" in that context.
That doesn't prevent the game from being political in the broader sense, that is, that it depicts a fictional dystopian scenario where certain political ideologies play out and you get to draw your own conclusions about them.
Cyberpunk has always been a political statement, strictly critical of capitalism, corporatism, and corruption of power
It would be the pinnacle of cynicism for CD Projket Red to criticize real-life capitalism. The Polish studio was born out of the economic and cultural devastation inflicted by 52 years of tyrannical communist rule. The company now stands as a shinning example, the poster child for the immense and unsurpassable virtues of capitalism, as it exemplifies the triumph of talent, persistence and hard work, the absolute superiority of freedom and individualism over brute collectivism.
Just imagine. CDPR's founders would probably be working at a cheese factory, had despotic communism not been kicked out and, thank goodness, replaced by a free market economy. We certainly wouldn't have the Witcher franchise nor Cyberpunk 2077 were it not for capitalism.
Equally important, the studio is a public company (
source). CD Projekt is listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange, where it's enjoyed constant growth over the years. Currently, its market cap sits at €8.01 billion (
source). Marcin Iwisnki, co-founder and current co-CEO, is now a
billionaire (
source). That's
billionaire, with a B.
It simply doesn't get any more capitalist than that.
"For me, the most important thing is that our game is a closed work and it is not a political statement, a political thesis.”
Fantastic.
I would not be looking forward to being preached upon.
That is a political statement. Criticising wealth inequality
Provided it's the product of voluntary interactions and thus not of violations of rights, wealth inequality is fair and moral. Especially because the system that generates the most inequality also happens to be the system that's most effective at eradicating poverty and promoting overall prosperity: capitalism.
and capitalism and corruption is completely a political statement. Short of addressing that major political parties are guilty of fostering all of that
What a silly silly response.
First off, Cyberpunk is set in an alternate reality. Secondly, corruption is a direct by-product of statism and state regulation. Thirdly, you don't get to interpret silence or omission at your discretion, just because it's convenient to you. You can't read minds and discern intentions without providing evidence for your preferred explanations.
CDPR stands as a great corporation, a genuine triumph of freedom and free enterprise, a triumph of resolute will and creative spirit, a triumph of capitalism. Without capitalism, CDPR wouldn't exist, the Witcher games wouldn't exist and Cyberpunk 2077 would be a mirage destined never to leave an obscure American writer's imagination.
Long live capitalism.