tried what exactly? Monokuma declared the trial over the second it got to a point where it looked like either party was guilty. There was no room to try anything!
Kyoko hadn't examined the body (or at least not forensically) in trial 5 because she was on the 2nd floor dorms for most of the day.
And the conclusion she comes to before the trial is that it's a trap. But she doesn't get the time to unravel anything.
How would she have known that it was the small piercing wounds which killed Mukuro? She doesn't even realize this until later, when they have enough time to examine the corpse in preparation for the final trial.
She was there at the scene for a few minutes at most. She can sense the inconsistencies but not so conclusively that she can convince everyone else of her doubts.
No, she doesn't bother trying to unravel anything. She went into the trial and played defense rather than trying to at least point out the elephant in the room, namely that everyone watched this murder occur.
Thank you, I wanted to post that.
This was completely uncharacteristic of her. If it were just the wounds then I could agree that maybe she needed more time to wrap her head around it but she had proved multiple times throughout the game that she was a stickler for the smallest details, a single glance at the corpse and you would notice those fake red nails, only one person matched that description and I highly doubt that Kyoko just drops all knowledge of a person once they die.
Dunno man, you're asking for the character to essentially solve the whole game off one detail. And that's before we get into how she'll convince everyone else.
I think it's safe to assume that was trying to indict Makoto to get the heat away from her. And that's totally fine! She got dealt a really bad hand and panicked; I think most people would do the same in her situation. If she had more info that case would have been significantly different.
Nah, not at all. All she had to do was point out that the body was Junko's (not even needing to prove that this Junko was a fake), do a decent job of convincing everyone (fingernails, multiple old wounds on the body which everyone could confirm by reading the monokuma file they already had, and that the bomb conveniently made id'ing the face impossible)
So yeah, basically solve the whole game! I think you're forgetting one conclusive piece of evidence that helped convince everyone later on (the number of bodies left inside the lab). Going from 'mukuro is dead' to 'this is mukuro who was actually junko' is such a leap in logic with the artificially limited pool of data they had available.
Well, this whole debate came up because people were saying that Kyoko did what she had to do and had no other option, obviously I think she is an ass who took the easy way out.
But that's the thing, I don't think she's an ass for taking the easy way out. There's no way she could accurately piece everything together under that time, even with the Monokuma file on hand. She definitely needed some time to herself to piece together all of the relevant information in the case. But she wasn't afforded that luxury AND was under an intense amount of pressure to boot (her life was on the line!), so it's possible that she simply couldn't make the connection at the time. I couldn't (at first) and I had an omnipotent field of vision! She might be the Ultimate Detective, but she's also human.
You didn't need her to piece together everything for your behind to be saved, she literally just had to scratch the surface. All she had to say was "that body isn't Mukuro's, it's Junko's" and even that 100% wrong statement (but easily provable and kind of right) would have been enough to take the heat off of both Kyoko and Makoto and everyone else which would have lead into my "mistrial" example above. Obviously they wouldn't need to write the story exactly how I laid it out but I chose an easy path to get it right back on track with where chapter 6 starts off.
They've never met Mukuro, they don't know if she wore fake nails, and the tattoo is still on her hand, which confirmed to them that it was Mukuro. All their assumptions leading up to this point is that people are what they are. Kyoko's discovery of the file in the headmaster's office does nothing to shake this. I really don't see how she could have theorized that this was actually 'Junko' in time.
That's the problem, right there
My argument is that she couldn't (at the time) make that connection. There's also the fact that she'd have to convince Byakuya, who was 100% convinced that the body belonged to Mukuru. And she can't exactly mistrial if Monokuma was absolutely set on killing her.
Assuming she actually did try prove that Mukuru was killed by someone else besides Makoto
Under these conditions:
-Byakuya would be absolutely convinced that it was her
-Hiro and Aoi would probably vote for her (given the evidence/lack of trust)
-Makoto wouldn't vote period
-Monokuma would cut the trial short (he intended to kill her)
She'd be signing her death warrant. Her only option for survival was throw Makoto under the bus.
.
Monokuma can't cut the trial with that allegation out there. Everyone would realize the implication that raises if the body was Junko's, the killer was Monokuma so who would everyone be able to vote for anyway? Once that is brought up, it would need to be settled before a vote could, realistically, take place. I don't see why Byakuya wouldn't entertain the notion, he can tell me what type of shoes the entire cast is wearing, I'm sure Kyoko could have asked him who had fake fingernails and he could have named Junko himself. Hiro, Aoi, and Toko don't matter at this point, they are doing whatever the big players are doing. If anything, that random allegation would have at least given Kyoko more time to think, I can't think of a logical way for Monokuma to force them to vote if the sentiment among the group is that Monokuma was the murderer.
But Monokuma DID cut the trial with a lot of hanging things in the air, because that's precisely what he wanted to. Unlike the other trials, he waited until there was enough rope to hang either of the two thorns in his side before declaring it over(which he had never done before EVER) and then it was all over.
Would Kyoko had done things differently if she knew that Monokuma for the first time ever would actually end the trial early like he did? Maybe, but there's an equal chance she would have let the events play on, and dedicated herself further to catching the culprit in the act, only this time adding Makoto's murder to the crimes piled onto kuma. Of course, she probably would have, and they probably would have gotten to the end of that other trial, but without hope, well, everyone dies.
I mean, the bad ending was kind of a joke, sure, but it also showed definitively what would have happened if Makoto had stuck Kyoko to the wall like Monokuma wanted.
Wasn't the bio lab still locked up at this point too? Without the idea that the bodies were preserved(she could have been throwing them into the incinerator or having the plant eat them for all anyone knew), there's no way any of them would have made the leap in logic to accuse Junko.
The entire point of the trial was to take out Kyoko, so he'd definitely cut the trial short while it was in his best interest. He was blatantly cheating remember?
The reason why I think that Byakuya wouldn't entertain the notion of Mukuru being Junko was because he does exactly that in the 6th case; he outright refuses to acknowledge the possibility of Junko being Mukuru:
And cmon, Byakuya might be intelligent but he's also short-sighted and uncooperative (at times). Makoto and Kyoko have to constantly beat concepts over his head until he accepts them.
Hina, Toko and Hiro DO matter because their votes are what's ultimately going to seal Kyoko's fight in your hypothetical scenario. I could see them voting for Kyoko out of fear for their lives or distrust without hard evidence (which would be hard to present since Monokuma was set on cutting the trial short) What could possibly make them suspect that Monokuma is the killer?
My problem with your scenario is that it's predicated on Kyoko keeping a cool head immediately figuring out that the body belongs to Junko.
Byakuya wasn't intelligent enough to realise the rooms were switched in Case 2. (To be fair, he probably never was in the boy's room before and probably didn't know about the carpet stain).
Right, he cuts it short when Kyoko or Makoto are the prime suspects, he can't cut it short when he, himself, is the prime suspect which is how it would have been if Kyoko's brain was working during this trial.
This is the guy who didn't figure out that Junko and Mukuru were one in the same after the 6th investigation (when it was blatantly obvious that Junko = Mukuru due to the number of dead bodies not matching up with the number of murders + Mukuru and Fake!Junko having same measurements) convincing him that they were one and the same would be a tall order in a short amount of time.You're confusing two different things I think. Byakuya wouldn't entertain that Makuto was Junko from the very beginning, in this scenario, you just need to get him to believe that the corpse on the ground was Junko's not Makuto's. Those are two totally different things.
Edit: And as I said, once you prove that the body on the ground was Junko's then Aoi, Hiro, and Toko would believe Monokuma was the killer because they WATCHED the death happen.
So I went through Taka'a report card today (school mode). I like him a lot more now. He has a lot more depth as a character that dictates his behavior. He went from the category of annoying me to being one of my more liked characters.
This is the guy who didn't figure out that Junko and Mukuru were one in the same after the 6th investigation (when it was blatantly obvious that Junko = Mukuru due to the number of dead bodies not matching up with the number of murders + Mukuru and Fake!Junko having same measurements) convincing him that they were one and the same would be a tall order in a short amount of time.
No one needs to convince anyone that they are one in the same, idk why you keep saying that. They just need to conivince them that the corpse on the ground isn't the one they think it is.
But they can't, because it is Mukuro. They've seen the tattoo. Monokuma will dispute any attempt to say otherwise. Discovering that she was once Junko hinges on evidence they don't have.
I think I was a fan of Ishimaru after Oowada's death.
Those real bro tears, man.
There is no evidence that links that tattoo to Mukuro at this time, is there?
So I went through Taka'a report card today (school mode). I like him a lot more now. He has a lot more depth as a character that dictates his behavior. He went from the category of annoying me to being one of my more liked characters.
No one needs to convince anyone that they are one in the same, idk why you keep saying that. They just need to conivince them that the corpse on the ground isn't the one they think it is.
Fenrir, man. Byakuya and Makoto both see the student info page in Kyoko's room.
So I went through Taka'a report card today (school mode). I like him a lot more now. He has a lot more depth as a character that dictates his behavior. He went from the category of annoying me to being one of my more liked characters.
I can't find it now, can someone post that unofficial video of Taka's execution?
I was kinda hoping Makoto was actually the culprit on chapter 5 and the story continued with Kyoko as the main character.
That would have only been impactful to me if they had turned around after that and revealed that Makoto was also the mastermind somehow, it would've had to have been done in a way that made sense though.
Oh that is FUCKED UP