MagicWithEarvin
Member
Sure, I'm not saying otherwise, but the ending does leave you wondering what will happen next (or more accurately, how everything will unfold).
Hopefully, that comes into fruition in future games. That ending was boss.
Sure, I'm not saying otherwise, but the ending does leave you wondering what will happen next (or more accurately, how everything will unfold).
Game isn't even out yet there's popping up tons of walkthrough vids on youtube already.
Some people got the game shipped to them a few days early from the THQ store.
So I watched some playthroughs on youtube from the first hour of the game and it seems that both versions have lots of tearing and frame-rate drops (especially while in combat the frame-rate looks like it always takes a hit in both systems) with PS3 being the worst of the two...also spotted some LoD problems that seemed more profound on the PS3 version.
The mid-level loading for some reason in the vids I saw was taking more time on the 360 version than the PS3...either way it looks like it could get really distracting later in the game, hopefully it will not be that bad when installing the game.
Still can't wait for the game since it looks awesome and loved the first game but it's disappointing to see that DS2 probably has a worst frame-rate than the first game...I guess the "bigger scope, more ambitious" vision definitely has it's cons.
So is it true that the game checks your achievements/trophies to determine if you played the first game and doesn't need you to still have your actual game save?
fuck, cant deal with a sub-30 framerate. its a shame that we still have to deal with this shit in 2012. time to get a gaming pc.
Wii U will be the superior console version, best to just hang on.
I had a tough time deciding between this or Sleeping Dogs but after reading some twitter comments from respectable reviewers out there, especially the guy that mentioned he reviewed three games that went from "pretty good to awesome", there is no doubt in my mind that the "awesome" game is Darksiders 2 and I have not played an awesome game since Max Payne 3. Sleeping Dogs will just have to wait until October.
My 670 shall enjoy running this game. Here's hoping it's not capped at 60fps.
My 670 shall enjoy running this game. Here's hoping it's not capped at 60fps.
Yeah, and as much as I'm looking forward to Darksiders 2, I'm disappointed that it's a parallel sequel rather than a chronological sequel.
And what if it is? I really do not understand some of you PC gamers out there. The difference between 30 and 60 FPS is huge but I have never seen the difference between 60 and higher. Is your mind more at ease if you can capture 100 FPS?
And what if it is? I really do not understand some of you PC gamers out there. The difference between 30 and 60 FPS is huge but I have never seen the difference between 60 and higher. Is your mind more at ease if you can capture 100 FPS?
Depends on whether or not your monitor supports 120Hz. Anything higher than 60 on a standard monitor is indistinguishable, because well, it doesn't actually do anything
If you remember playing on a CRT back in the day, having 100fps+ in something felt like greased lightning compared to 30
Not too unexpected.So I watched some playthroughs on youtube from the first hour of the game and it seems that both versions have lots of tearing and frame-rate drops (especially while in combat the frame-rate looks like it always takes a hit in both systems) with PS3 being the worst of the two...also spotted some LoD problems that seemed more profound on the PS3 version.
The mid-level loading for some reason in the vids I saw was taking more time on the 360 version than the PS3...either way it looks like it could get really distracting later in the game, hopefully it will not be that bad when installing the game.
Still can't wait for DS2 since it looks awesome but it's disappointing to see that DS2 probably has a worst frame-rate than the first game...I guess the "bigger scope, more ambitious" vision definitely has it's cons.
Sure, I'm not saying otherwise, but the ending does leave you wondering what will happen next (or more accurately, how everything will unfold).
Here's a screenshot of the world map for those curious.
Here's a screenshot of the world map for those curious.
Wii U will be the superior console version, best to just hang on.
Here's a screenshot of the world map for those curious.
Wii U will be the superior console version, best to just hang on.
Here's a screenshot of the world map for those curious.
That's just the Forge Lands. There are 3 other major zones in the game.
What
That's crazy
Do you guys think that the game being so long will negatively affect the review scores?
So I watched some playthroughs on youtube from the first hour of the game and it seems that both versions have lots of tearing and frame-rate drops (especially while in combat the frame-rate looks like it always takes a hit in both systems) with PS3 being the worst of the two...also spotted some LoD problems that seemed more profound on the PS3 version.
The mid-level loading for some reason in the vids I saw was taking more time on the 360 version than the PS3...either way it looks like it could get really distracting later in the game, hopefully it will not be that bad when installing the game.
Still can't wait for DS2 since it looks awesome but it's disappointing to see that DS2 probably has a worst frame-rate than the first game...I guess the "bigger scope, more ambitious" vision definitely has it's cons.
LOL no.
:/
Goddamnit.
If the Wii U version doesn't have more fluff, I hope that at least it will be optimized better.
Fuck, I want a new PC.
Why not?
PS3 and most likely will double dip the Wii U version.
But if I had a PC that doesn't embarrass me to look at I'd pick the PC version for sure.
Cool.
Which reminds me, should we get like a spreadsheet going for PSN, XBL and Steam IDs? Ya know, for the loot trading and stuff. That'd be cool.
Because the better version isn't the one that requires me to wait 3 months and pay 300 dollars for a new console to play. Especially a console that we know nothing about the online mechanism, achievement system, etc etc etc. So no.
I thought they said the console versions don't tear? So its confirmed they both do?
Every stream I've watched appears to have it (360 and PS3 streams). Maybe it's the capture software?
It starts getting weird when everybody has bad capture software.
That first review of the game mentions the tearing.
Here's a screenshot of the world map for those curious.
Yeah, I'm trying to give the devs the benefit of the doubt since they told us there wasn't any, but that's getting harder to believe now.
fuck, cant deal with a sub-30 framerate. its a shame that we still have to deal with this shit in 2012. time to get a gaming pc.
I played sub-20FPS games on the N64 and liked it.
Look at all these whiners. "Boo-hoo, my precious eyes can't tolerate anything less than 30FPS."
So is the Crucible on disc or do I have to put in a password or some shit to unlock it or what
"Back in my day I played shitty-looking games and liked it! You kids today and your standards!"