demigod
Member
Some IGN review quotes.
Are you fucking for real, lol. I'd like for them to explain how freakers are real in real life.
Some IGN review quotes.
Well, you can't make them all black see RE5.The gamespot reviewer was complaining how the zombies are "all white" on Twitter. That's all you need to know about these 2 shit reviewers.
Are you fucking for real, lol. I'd like for them to explain how freakers are real in real life.
Xbox has exclusive games?Xbox exclusive scores average = 'Worst game eva', ;'lolz Xbox', 'Xbox still has no games lol'
Are you fucking for real, lol. I'd like for them to explain how freakers are real in real life.
Deacon is a SJW, he's married to a hippy after all.
Sony games go on sale fast even when highly successful.i dont know if i should dump 60 on this though
Yeah people on here should play it and get 85%+ trophies then post their trophies on here and genuinely (as if ) on here.
I actually think it looks quite good, but 50/ 60 hours of it, maybe not so. I'll wait till its cheap.
Never just meant it like that, just saying lots on here not played the game with near full trophies but giving their views on reviews/score, and its not always a good sign if you have to get trophies to enjoy games. I've completed a few and not got many trophies/ achievements and enjoyed the game, some I've got lots and not really enjoyed.You don't expect reviewers to play the game in order to derive a valid opinion?
Never just meant it like that, just saying lots on here not played the game with near full trophies but giving their views on reviews/score, and its not always a good sign if you have to get trophies to enjoy games. I've completed a few and not got many trophies/ achievements and enjoyed the game, some I've got lots and not really enjoyed.
My guess, this will be $30 digital in a flash sale by the end of the summer.should i wait a month for price to drop? what are the odds for that?
should i wait a month for price to drop? what are the odds for that?
Well this is it, what are they, i like trophies\achievements but as we know some can be tedious and some can give you extra replay and also make you enjoy the game more by making you do other stuff etc. It just depends what one's they haven't got and what you have to do.I figure he meant the story trophies that pop automatically when you reach certain points in the game.
Well this is it, what are they, i like trophies\achievements but as we know some can be tedious and some can give you extra replay and also make you enjoy the game more by making you do other stuff etc. It just depends what one's they haven't got and what you have to do.
I can't believe it's become "political" to complain about the very generic main character in this fairly generic game.
He's a generic character design because he looks exactly like the gruff bearded protagonists in many many other games of this type. His whiteness isn't politically grating to me, it's just one of the many features that feel too familiar.
Had he been white and male but also, say, beanpole skinny with thick glasses, or elderly, or overweight, people wouldn't be calling the design generic.
And I think this is typical of the broader problem: it isn't just the design looking familiar, they discuss the character's backstory and that feels generic too, and then they discuss the game's world, and so does that, and so on. I don't see any flourishes of imagination here to differentiate Days Gone from other zombie games.
The expected damage control from the usual suspects was expected.
Playstation fanboys have spent the last few years putting every ounce of weight behind reviews. If you didn't care for GoW, and mentioned it, you were immediately shut down with "Just look at the reviews. The majority of reviews said it's a masterpiece."
On the flip side, it you happened to enjoy something like State of Decay 2 or something, you got hit with "Look at the meta and review scores. It's trash... Just like all MS exclusives lately."
Now we're led to believe that this is all some sjw agenda? Or the reviewers must have not played the whole game, and got to the good parts?
Anyone who's been paying attention about this game could've seen this coming. It looked very 'meh' to begin with, and it reviewed as such. Sony fanboys can't question reviews now. You've been leaning on them far too hard, for far too long for that.
I literally can't remember a videogame with a biker protagonist outside of Gone Days.
Reviewer give Day Gone low score now, so when they gave previous Sony game high score it mean those game is really good right?The expected damage control from the usual suspects was expected.
Playstation fanboys have spent the last few years putting every ounce of weight behind reviews. If you didn't care for GoW, and mentioned it, you were immediately shut down with "Just look at the reviews. The majority of reviews said it's a masterpiece."
On the flip side, it you happened to enjoy something like State of Decay 2 or something, you got hit with "Look at the meta and review scores. It's trash... Just like all MS exclusives lately."
Now we're led to believe that this is all some sjw agenda? Or the reviewers must have not played the whole game, and got to the good parts?
Anyone who's been paying attention about this game could've seen this coming. It looked very 'meh' to begin with, and it reviewed as such. Sony fanboys can't question reviews now. You've been leaning on them far too hard, for far too long for that.
The expected damage control from the usual suspects was expected.
Playstation fanboys have spent the last few years putting every ounce of weight behind reviews. If you didn't care for GoW, and mentioned it, you were immediately shut down with "Just look at the reviews. The majority of reviews said it's a masterpiece."
On the flip side, it you happened to enjoy something like State of Decay 2 or something, you got hit with "Look at the meta and review scores. It's trash... Just like all MS exclusives lately."
Now we're led to believe that this is all some sjw agenda? Or the reviewers must have not played the whole game, and got to the good parts?
Anyone who's been paying attention about this game could've seen this coming. It looked very 'meh' to begin with, and it reviewed as such. Sony fanboys can't question reviews now. You've been leaning on them far too hard, for far too long for that.
Not really as long as reviewers on these critic sides are lying and trying to push a political agenda like Gamespot did. It is not really different. Furthermore it maybe good for you but not the over reception of the game since metacritic scores are even integrated into in som contracts.Always use Open Critic. They're way better than MetaCritic imo.
This is not the problem with this game. the problem is that many of these very low reviews want to push an agenda and scored it ow because of it. It hurts the overall reputation. I fucks the developer who invested so much time in it etc. They straight up lie to justify it and they talk how upset they are that there are only white Zombies etc. They call out "sexist" scenes without context like the wedding park which is actually a real thing in this biker culture. They do not even finish the game and then lie about Deacon not developing as a character etc.from other forum
"
Just to remind everyone.. All games with under 80 mc:
I'm not saying this to defend Days Gone. I haven't played it yet. I'll play it later tonight or tomorrow and I'll share my thoughts. But I'm trying to say that your enjoyment of a game is going to rely heavily on your own personal affinity for its setting and themes and style. Reviewers may or may not sync up with you, and for every sub-80 game that I think is brilliant, there are also many games in the over 90 range that I think are literally terrible.
- Dying Light - 74 mc
- Detroit Become Human - 78 mc
- The Surge - 73 mc (I personally adored this game, despite its flaws)
- Alien Isolation - 79 mc- (IGN, gamespot, and polygon all gave it ~6/10, and I consider this the best horror game ever made)
- The Evil Within 2 - 76 mc (I consider this one of the best survival horror games ever made)
- Don't Starve - 78 mc (This is LITERALLY MY FAVORITE GAME EVER MADE.)
That number is not everything. It's very difficult to sum up a complex piece of art and technology with one number. "
Just to remind everyone.. All games with under 80 mc:
- Dying Light - 74 mc
That would make everything worse I think. Once the internet has made up its mind, you better not argue against it.dunki said:If I were Bent I would call them out and accuse them of libel. There is already enough evidence to support this claim.
from other forum
"
Just to remind everyone.. All games with under 80 mc:
I'm not saying this to defend Days Gone. I haven't played it yet. I'll play it later tonight or tomorrow and I'll share my thoughts. But I'm trying to say that your enjoyment of a game is going to rely heavily on your own personal affinity for its setting and themes and style. Reviewers may or may not sync up with you, and for every sub-80 game that I think is brilliant, there are also many games in the over 90 range that I think are literally terrible.
- Dying Light - 74 mc
- Detroit Become Human - 78 mc
- The Surge - 73 mc (I personally adored this game, despite its flaws)
- Alien Isolation - 79 mc- (IGN, gamespot, and polygon all gave it ~6/10, and I consider this the best horror game ever made)
- The Evil Within 2 - 76 mc (I consider this one of the best survival horror games ever made)
- Don't Starve - 78 mc (This is LITERALLY MY FAVORITE GAME EVER MADE.)
That number is not everything. It's very difficult to sum up a complex piece of art and technology with one number. "
These reviewers right now getting a lot of backlash already which is a good thing. video reviews like on IGN getting downvoted etc. gamer are not standing up for this bullshit. No one is saying it is a masterpiece but openly lying about mechanics, story, characters is not ok.WHAT? Dying Light is a solid 9/10 in my book. The atmosphere, the gameplay, the graphics, all outstanding. These reviewers must have been high, or not, because if the were the might have enjoyed it more.
That would make everything worse I think. Once the internet has made up its mind, you better not argue against it.
Not posting ACG's review is doing it wrong..
Retirement home or Fat camp zombie game would be awesome!I can't believe it's become "political" to complain about the very generic main character in this fairly generic game.
He's a generic character design because he looks exactly like the gruff bearded protagonists in many many other games of this type. His whiteness isn't politically grating to me, it's just one of the many features that feel too familiar.
Had he been white and male but also, say, beanpole skinny with thick glasses, or elderly, or overweight, people wouldn't be calling the design generic.
And I think this is typical of the broader problem: it isn't just the design looking familiar, they discuss the character's backstory and that feels generic too, and then they discuss the game's world, and so does that, and so on. I don't see any flourishes of imagination here to differentiate Days Gone from other zombie games.
Xbox exclusive scores average = 'Worst game eva', ;'lolz Xbox', 'Xbox still has no games lol'
Playstation exclusive scores average = 'Who listens to reviews anyway lol', 'Stupid reviewers played the unpatched game', 'Did the reviewers even play the game?, i dont think they did'.
Never change Gaf, never change.
Sony fanboys in full damage control, relax. Not everything Sony shits out is gold.
Always use Open Critic. They're way better than MetaCritic imo.
Not posting ACG's review is doing it wrong..
From what I have seen so far it looks like a 75-80% game which is totally fine but we are dealing here with 5 and 6 by major gaming sites who lie about events in the game, who lie about mechanics and the story overall. And this especially hurts the developer who did for the first time a real open world AAA game and these agenda driven bloggers destroy their reputation and future with this bullshit.72 on both MC and OC tells me one thing, the game might actually not be bad but sure made people have mixed feeling about it.