• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

DC Comics announces "Doomsday Clock", starring Superman and some blue guy

Zubz

Banned
I'm actually in for this. I feel Watchmen should remain its own thing, but they've been setting up Manhattan as an arc villain, & I'm curious to see where they go with that.
 
tumblr_nw575urZU51qf37hzo1_400.png

How I feel right now. God, I love watchmen.
 
True but if they're already on the table, you might as well play it out.

Yeah, the ship has sailed. I don't have to like it, but DC will be milking the Watchmen for the next thirty years.

Eh, even if Before Watchmen was bad, if somebody can think of a good story that actually makes good use of the characters, there's no reason they should be forever off limits.

Again, it's not like Moore is an angel about being respectful with characters created by other people.

Does Alan Moore own his characters? Does he profit from any of this?

I think the both sides argument is awful in this situation. Moore took public domain characters and worked them into League. DC stole his characters by keeping them continually in print.
 

Maddocks

Member
I'm hyped, sure it is going to be a lone wait, but the button has been amazing and if it follows that trend, going to be great.
 
Yeah, the ship has sailed. I don't have to like it, but DC will be milking the Watchmen for the next thirty years.



Does Alan Moore own his characters? Does he profit from any of this?

I think the both sides argument is awful in this situation. Moore took public domain characters and worked them into League. DC stole his characters by keeping them continually in print.

Why should we expect DC or any other company to stop printing something that is selling good? It's Moore's fault for agreeing to the deal, DC didn't steal anything. Nobody with even a modicum of sense would agree to a contract that screws you if your work is popular or benefits you in no way if it's not.
 

Einchy

semen stains the mountaintops
I'm all for this.

I love Watchmen but I don't think those characters should be left to root because of a guy who worships a snake. If it sucks and then fuck it up, well, they fucked it up but that doesn't change how good Watchmen is. I mean, they released some prequel comics and I've heard some were good and some were bad but that didn't change how I saw Moore's comic.
 

Nairume

Banned
I think the both sides argument is awful in this situation. Moore took public domain characters and worked them into League. DC stole his characters by keeping them continually in print.
Not everything he put into League or his other similar stories was public domain.
 
Why should we expect DC or any other company to stop printing something that is selling good? It's Moore's fault for agreeing to the deal, DC didn't steal anything. Nobody with even a modicum of sense would agree to a contract that screws you if your work is popular or benefits you in no way if it's not.

Nice 2017 lenses. Whitewashing DC's guilt here is hilarious. The deal Moore signed was common at the time, and publishers wouldn't keep books in print longer than a year or so.

Your response leads me to believe you've not read up on this. Fuck those dopes Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster, too, right? Next time lawyer up.
 
Wondering how they will work out being in there... just cause the Watchmen were kinda like low rent Batmen at best aside from a few moments. How will they fit into the greater DC universe or pair up with the already established groups.

You know aside from ol Blue genitals himself.
 
Very excited for this, The Button has been amazing.

And lol at some of the people in this thread. Who the fuck cares about the sanctity of Watchmen? Moore certainly doesn't and the book will always be there and stand on its own. DC is trying some weird shit right now and most of it has been pretty damn great.
 
I'm not talking about reboots. I'm more using it as an example of the numerous things the series did towards it's long run and conclusion that completely botched certain characters and motivations.

"So the bad guys weren't really the bad guys? They were being controlled by one super bad guy? Cuz fate and reincarnation? WTF?"
Oh. Never knew that was true with Naruto too. Another reason not to read it then.



Edit

I did tried, many times. Just could not get into it. Sorry Naruto fans.
 
I don't like batman rebirth as much as I was hoping to. But dc rebirth as a whole has been dope, and the button story was pretty cool

This should be nice.

0n one hand it kinda sucks that they are messing with watchmen. Should be standalone tbh. But the idea of Manhattan fucking with the dc universe is novel imo.
 
So this seems to be the general opinion:

Read Rebirth: "I love Rebirth this is going to be awesome!"

Hasn't read Rebirth / DC in 10+ years / ever: "Comics gonna comics, leave watchmen alone, Zach Snyder ruined the DCCU."

I'm definitely in the first camp.
 

VeeP

Member
Rebirth and the Button have been amazing so far. So hopefully this even continues that trend.

So this seems to be the general opinion:

Read Rebirth: "I love Rebirth this is going to be awesome!"

Hasn't read Rebirth / DC in 10+ years / ever: "Comics gonna comics, leave watchmen alone, Zach Snyder ruined the DCCU."

I'm definitely in the first camp.

Wait, your saying GAF just assumes things and just drive by shit posts?

... sounds about right.
 

shoreu

Member
Liking the idea of Superman as the centerpiece here. He's been the best part of Rebirth, bar none.

But, as I've been going through a DC Comics backlog on Hoopla... Geoff Johns has got to be one of the most underwhelming writers I've encountered. I've never read a thing by him that wasn't forgettable. I don't really have faith in him to do Dr. Manhattan or any other bits of the Watchmen universe justice.

Geoff johns has to be one of the best writers I've encountered. Anything he touches he elevates like his green lantern run sheesh so damn good.
 
I've been a little up and down with the actual Rebirth titles themselves, but on the whole, Rebirth has been a pretty great initiative from DC. A great attitude from the storytellers, to editorial and above in trying to dial into what all fans want and giving it to them be it double shipping main books, launching imprints for niche characters to thrive in, and so on. I honestly don't really read comics for these big crossovers, nor do I care much about the watchmen either way, but they've definitely did this in a strong way, and it's hard not to be excited, even when it's interfering in your batman. If this is what excites the creators involved, then I'll read it.
 
Alan Moores best work are his Green Lantern and Star Wars comics. Everything after that has been naval gazing bullshit. League of Extraordinary Gentlemen was a really interesting premise and world but he somehow even managed to make that go downhill by the second story arc.
 

Sesha

Member
I'm so sick and tired of the Watchmen. It would have been somewhat different if it continued beyond its original run, but it didn't.

Alan Moores best work are his Green Lantern and Star Wars comics. Everything after that has been naval gazing bullshit. League of Extraordinary Gentlemen was a really interesting premise and world but he somehow even managed to make that go downhill by the second story arc.

Tom Strong was not navel*-gazing.
 

Blues1990

Member
I too love actively missing out on good books via meaningless generalized criticism.

Eh, he's not wrong. I'm more partial to one off's, as at least I can get a fun self-contained story, rather than slogging through a bloated event that has little meaning in the long run.
 

Screaming Meat

Unconfirmed Member
I'm taking bets that they retcon Rorschach into this.

”Look guys: Rorschach wasn't really killed by Dr Manhattan, he was actually transported to the future of the DCU!"

”Hang on, I don't think that's how time works in Watch—”

”It's Rorschach, guys!"

”What about all that blood?”

"You like Rorschach, right?"

"Doesn't that undermine th--"

”MOAR RORSCAHCAHACHAHH!"

Either that or Manhattan 'rebuilds' him or something.

Alan Moores best work are his Green Lantern and Star Wars comics. Everything after that has been naval gazing bullshit. League of Extraordinary Gentlemen was a really interesting premise and world but he somehow even managed to make that go downhill by the second story arc.

Top Ten was not navel-gazing.
 

Ross61

Member
I'm taking bets that they retcon Rorschach into this.

“Look guys: Rorschach wasn’t really killed by Dr Manhattan, he was actually transported to the future of the DCU!”

“Hang on, I don’t think that’s how time works in Watch—“

“It's Rorschach, guys!”

“What about all that blood?“

"You like Rorschach, right?"

"Doesn't that undermine th--"

“MOAR RORSCAHCAHACHAHH!”

Either that or Manhattan 'rebuilds' him or something.



Top Ten was not navel-gazing.
This event will not involve Watchmen canon. Geoff made clear as did Gary Franks on his Twitter page.
 
Eh, he's not wrong. I'm more partial to one off's, as at least I can get a fun self-contained story, rather than slogging through a bloated event that has little meaning in the long run.

I don't really give a shit about events and continuity in general but there have been a lot of incredible self-contained stories since New 52. Omega Men alone is one of the best comics of the last decade imo. And you can follow most Rebirth books without having to pay attention to any of the Watchmen stuff. Just dismissing everything DC post New 52 as he or she did is just silly.
 

Ross61

Member
What does that mean exactly?
Well, if I'm not mistaken Dr. Manhattan left. And where he would have ended up was the multiverse. At the point he is
removed from the Watchmen cannon. As far as we know from this interview, Dr. Manhattan is the only Watchmen character involved in this story.
 

Screaming Meat

Unconfirmed Member
Well, if I'm not mistaken Dr. Manhattan left. And where he would have ended up was the multiverse. At the point he is
removed from the Watchmen cannon. As far as we know from this interview, Dr. Manhattan is the only Watchmen character involved in this story.

Ah, gotcha.

I dunno, man. The odds have changed, but I'm still taking those bets :)

Eh, even if Before Watchmen was bad, if somebody can think of a good story that actually makes good use of the characters, there's no reason they should be forever off limits.

Yeah, if something is good, it's good. If Rebirth turns out well, great. It just seems to me that Watchmen has a history of people taking influence or appropriating elements of it that wildly miss the point.

For example, the actual story was never the important part of Watchmen. What makes it special is in how the story was told. I don't recall seeing any related media get that yet, and I doubt Rebirth will change that.

I appreciate I'm the worst kind of whinging fanboy about this. I'm not proud of it.
 

Aizo

Banned
Let's react after we see whether it's good or not, yeah?
I'm interested. I hope it's well done. Moore got screwed over, but that was done a while ago. I don't find this to be a surprise, personally.
 
So this seems to be the general opinion:

Read Rebirth: "I love Rebirth this is going to be awesome!"

Hasn't read Rebirth / DC in 10+ years / ever: "Comics gonna comics, leave watchmen alone, Zach Snyder ruined the DCCU."

I'm definitely in the first camp.

That's a little too accurate.
 
Well, if I'm not mistaken Dr. Manhattan left. And where he would have ended up was the multiverse. At the point he is
removed from the Watchmen cannon. As far as we know from this interview, Dr. Manhattan is the only Watchmen character involved in this story.

I'm pretty sure Oz is Ozymandis and New 52 Question is supposed to be Rorschach:

unlocking-the-future-of-the-dc-universe-20120508034929898.jpg
 
Top Bottom