Is the mid credit scene spoil stuff for the rest of the film. Was thinking of looking at what it was.
Who in charge of Budgeting? Because that's insane.
I mean Batman Begins did well at 350mil. I know times are different, but I expected 600 mil to be a success story for Suicide Squad.
Yeah, that isn't right. A new IP like SS shouldn't have to make that much to just break even. WB isn't budgeting these films correctly. I hope it breaks even, but what kind of business are you running where a movie has to make 800 million to make money? How much revenue do they expect SS to generate?THR says Squad needs to make 750-800 million to break even, which is insane.
Yeah, that isn't right. A new IP like SS shouldn't have to make that much to just break even. WB isn't budgeting these films correctly. I hope it breaks even, but what kind of business are you running where a movie has to make 800 million to make money? How much revenue do they expect SS to generate?
The financials behind these blockbusters is just mind boggling to me. Maybe Lucas and Spielberg were right when they said a crash was imminent.
Oh. My. God.Well fuck. So basically BvS 2.0 but issue is tone, not runtime.
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/he...secret-drama-rushed-916693?utm_source=twitter
There were two cuts tested - Ayer's original and a cut WB worked on themselves with Trailer Park (who did some of the trailers here). WB's cut initially won and end result seems to be a mad mishmash of both.
Well fuck. So basically BvS 2.0 but issue is tone, not runtime.
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/he...secret-drama-rushed-916693?utm_source=twitter
There were two cuts tested - Ayer's original and a cut WB worked on themselves with Trailer Park (who did some of the trailers here). WB's cut initially won and end result seems to be a mad mishmash of both.
THR says Squad needs to make 750-800 million to break even, which is insane.
Mayimbe just tweeted that the Johns era begins with WW
THR says Squad needs to make 750-800 million to break even, which is insane.
Mayimbe just tweeted that the Johns era begins with WW
Is the mid credit scene spoil stuff for the rest of the film. Was thinking of looking at what it was.
Probably because those movies weren't killed by reviewers and ended up making what they expected them to make.I wonder why no one digs out these numbers when Marvel releases a film. No one was talking about numbers when Thor 2 was out, or even Ant-Man.
Where? I wanna seeUmberto saying the same thing, and how the biggest problem with DC Films isn't DC... it's WB brass.
Ghostbusters won't make its money back at all. It was an outright failure and the media won't even mention it cuz nobody cares about Ghostbusters. I still don't get how that movie ended up costing 150 million dollars and that's without marketing.Yea it's not just this movie either. Ghostbusters is going to struggle to make its money back.
Umberto saying the same thing, and how the biggest problem with DC Films isn't DC... it's WB brass.
HereWhere? I wanna see
Maybe because his movies were good enough that nobody noticed that they weren humorous beside Alfreds dry humor and Jokers puns.Rene Rodriguez
Miami Herald August 3, 2016
There isn't a moment of spontaneous fun or humor in this long, turgid movie, the latest letdown for DC Comics fans who've been waiting for someone to pick up the baton Christopher Nolan left behind.
Full Review | Original Score: 1/4
---
See, I don't get these 'reviews'. Nolan movies weren't exactly 'FUN' or 'HUMOROUS'. They were well-crafted films as a whole. Not sure why these assholes bring up these terms at all in their reviews and then mention Nolan as well on the side.
To be fair I think bar Johns not many DC people have really been involved with MoS and SS so far. So WB execs being to blame sounds believable.
I remember when the current CEO took over I think he was vocal about a DCEU but it sounds more like it was a DCEU by committee.
Man, fuck WB
Because going by that THR article
This: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLLQK9la6Go
Was the original tone of the movie for sure.
FUCK.
while Ayer pursued his original vision, Warners set about working on a different cut, with an assist from Trailer Park, the company that had made the teaser.
Still my favorite trailer. I'm holding out hope that it's still there though. I won't know for sure until I see the movie.Man, fuck WB
Because going by that THR article
This: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLLQK9la6Go
Was the original tone of the movie for sure.
FUCK.
Where? I wanna see
DC FANBOY NATION! Our common enemy is not RT or critics but as you can now clearly see this morning - it's Warner Brass.
Our PRINCESS putting in the work
Rene Rodriguez
Miami Herald August 3, 2016
There isn't a moment of spontaneous fun or humor in this long, turgid movie, the latest letdown for DC Comics fans who've been waiting for someone to pick up the baton Christopher Nolan left behind.
Full Review | Original Score: 1/4
---
See, I don't get these 'reviews'. Nolan movies weren't exactly 'FUN' or 'HUMOROUS'. They were well-crafted films as a whole. Not sure why these assholes bring up these terms at all in their reviews and then mention Nolan as well on the side.
The official trailer.Guys, am I reading this wrong or does the article say that Trailer Park cut the Comic Con First Look, or are they talking about the first official trailer ?
It says teaser so I'm assuming it's the Comic Con stuff.Guys, am I reading this wrong or does the article say that Trailer Park cut the Comic Con First Look, or are they talking about the first official trailer ?
The official trailer.
Mayimbe swears the Johns era starts with WW and that the days of executive meddling are over, here's to hoping.
It says teaser so I'm assuming it's the Comic Con stuff.
They are talking about the Bohemian Rhapsody trailerGuys, am I reading this wrong or does the article say that Trailer Park cut the Comic Con First Look, or are they talking about the first official trailer ?
Well, Faraci!!!!! said WW looking good.
Much like BvS, so too has my hope died.killed off Superman
WW in 10 months, JL in a few more. Whatever they've been doing hasn't worked, not the least following favorable response to the ultimate cut. At least there's time to get those in a good place.
Maybe we will get another cut of Suicide Squad on home video after all this.
I did the same thing. Though I'm in the States, so it was only like 25 bucks. I can't believe the 3D version wasn't the UC. They pimp it so much that I just expected it to be. Like how the 4K version is actually the UC.Holy shit, the BvS bluray released today and I picked up the FORTY FIVE EURO 3D bluray and guess fucking what: only the theatrical cut is 3D, the Ultimate Edition is 2D only.
MotherFUCKER. I never paid this much for a movie in my entire life.
Holy shit, the BvS bluray released today and I picked up the FORTY FIVE EURO 3D bluray and guess fucking what: only the theatrical cut is 3D, the Ultimate Edition is 2D only.
MotherFUCKER. I never paid this much for a movie in my entire life.
I did the same thing. Though I'm in the States, so it was only like 25 bucks. I can't believe the 3D version wasn't the UC. They pimp it so much that I just expected it to be. Like how the 4K version is actually the UC.
Collider posted their written review by Matt Goldberg
http://collider.com/suicide-squad-review/
D+
It’s a movie where you can see the competing visions between writer-director David Ayer and the studio and the result is a film where everyone loses, especially the audience.