HHH was good in 2000
and okay in 1999
that's it
every other year he was the drizzling shits
He was okay in 2000. I think lost in the 2000 Triple H narrative -- there's that word again -- is that he was put in every match imaginable to get him over. Like, everything is a specialty match with a great opponent and it's given 20+ minutes.
I mean, you can call it rightly booking a guy to be strong, but it was overkill. He was given more than anyone before or after, I imagine. But watching it soberly in 2016, it's all downhill from Royal Rumble 2000. Which, I might add, was more Mick Foley being great than Triple H being good.