Well his son just recently died and he said he still isn't over the grieving process.Shouldn't he have decided by now? I'd think if you were serious about running for president, you'd decide and announce before the first debate...
Well his son just recently died and he said he still isn't over the grieving process.Shouldn't he have decided by now? I'd think if you were serious about running for president, you'd decide and announce before the first debate...
Well his son just recently died and he said he still isn't over the grieving process.
Not only that but they agree on like 90% of the issues. The only thing Bernie and Hillary disagree on are guns and foreign policy.
Is Hillary for Universal, single payer healthcare?
If Sanders wants a chance at the nomination, tonight he needs to come out swinging and go straight for the jugular. Draw blood early, and just hammer away. If he can get Hillary on the defensive from the start and call her out on the issues he'll gain a ton of support.
Daniel B·;181522614 said:This. Of course, adhering strictly to Marquess of Queensberry rules, Bernie should use this national spotlight to starkly highlight the real differences between their policies, hopefully yielding soundbites that the media simply cannot ignore. He will not waste a moment on Benghazi or email server's, as he has real issues to debate, that anyone outside of the GOP and Fox News, actually care about.
If, instead, he just repeats his policy positions, without adeptly contrasting them with Hillary's, he may well put the audience to sleep and will have wasted the potential of a good deal of free press, that he possibly cannot afford to squander.
Despite the OP's uncharacteristic GIF , I think Anderson is potentially the perfect host for the Democratic debate and hopefully he will inject just the right amount of good natured energy into the proceedings .
Humor me, how would such a policy get passed in a Republican congress when the more moderate Obamacare was barely able to pass in a Democratic one?
One candidate could be for giving everyone a billion dollars, but it would be silly to use that a voting criteria because it is not something that can happen.
Republicans control most of government. Most governors are republican, most senators, and most congressmen. You can't work around them. Even when Democrats held control of Congress there were enough moderate Democrats to make Obamacare something that only passed by the skin of its teeth, Obamacare was nearly too liberal to pass that non-Republican winning congress.
Full on single payer? That is 100% off the table. No question.
Any candidate can make dream world like empty promises, but you shouldn't base your vote on such.
Need a history lesson? Try 1993. It was a failure, which is probably why she's inclined towards supporting Obamacare now. Learning from the mistakes of aiming too high too quickly.Is Hillary for Universal, single payer healthcare?
But what if Biden shows up? And announces his campaign at the debate? lol
Please talk about gun control. It needs to be talked about seriously, republicans just want more guns, and blame every shooting on mentally ill people.
So is your argument by definition to vote for Clinton because she would attempt to pass legislation that is pro corporation just to pass something?
He's gonna come out all JACK SWAGGER...
Need a history lesson? Try 1993. It was a failure, which is probably why she's inclined towards supporting Obamacare now. Learning from the mistakes of aiming too high too quickly.
Humor me, how would such a policy get passed in a Republican congress when the more moderate Obamacare was barely able to pass in a Democratic one?
One candidate could be for giving everyone a billion dollars, but it would be silly to use that a voting criteria because it is not something that can happen.
Republicans control most of government. Most governors are republican, most senators, and most congressmen. You can't work around them. Even when Democrats held control of Congress there were enough moderate Democrats to make Obamacare something that only passed by the skin of its teeth, Obamacare was nearly too liberal to pass that non-Republican winning congress.
Full on single payer? That is 100% off the table. No question.
Any candidate can make dream world like empty promises, but you shouldn't base your vote on such.
Greta Van Susteren ‏@greta
CNN should invite @realDonaldTrump to debate-if they can invite a Socialist / Sanders to Dem debate, why not a Rep?
So as an outsider, this is pretty much the quest for the presidency right? You guys surely arent crazy enough to put any of the Republicans into the White House considering the front runners?
No, the Dems would really need to fuck up for any of those nutters to make it to the White House.
Saying this is a contest is being a bit kind to Bernie though. Clinton is still very much in control of her own destiny right now. Short of a massive fuck up on her part, or Joe Biden jumping in, she has a stranglehold on the Obama coalition which makes her unbeatable. Anyone who wants to beat her will need to find a way to steal it away from her, which is easier said than done.
It's why I framed her as Mecha-Godzilla in the OP, and made Bernie the guy who dies half-way through the last Godzilla movie.
So as an outsider, this is pretty much the quest for the presidency right? You guys surely arent crazy enough to put any of the Republicans into the White House considering the front runners?
Strawman so big the fire would light the sky.
I think of O'Malley goes after anyone it's going to be Sanders. There's no benefit to him going after Hillary. I also doubt Hillary or Sanders will go after each other. Hillary has no reason to do so, and Sanders would only hurt himself if he's seen as a bully. Hillary's quite good at debates, usually outperforming Obama by a wide margin. She can stay on message, and you won't trip her up. She knows her shit.
They'll point out whatever minuscule differences exist between them, and then Chafee will also be there. So good for him, I suppose.
Course, I've already seen the Sander supporters on other sites preemptively plan to flood Twitter with "HE WON!" regardless of how he performs. So........ya.
I think of O'Malley goes after anyone it's going to be Sanders. There's no benefit to him going after Hillary. I also doubt Hillary or Sanders will go after each other. Hillary has no reason to do so, and Sanders would only hurt himself if he's seen as a bully. Hillary's quite good at debates, usually outperforming Obama by a wide margin. She can stay on message, and you won't trip her up. She knows her shit.
They'll point out whatever minuscule differences exist between them, and then Chafee will also be there. So good for him, I suppose.
Course, I've already seen the Sander supporters on other sites preemptively plan to flood Twitter with "HE WON!" regardless of how he performs. So........ya.
Have her polls stopped hemorrhaging?
Sanders is focusing on the issues, not personality politics. If anyone drags him into that realm, it'll be Hilary.
The democrats in the senate have shed off a lot on their right side of the party, mostly because a lot of them lost elections in Red states where they no longer care what you do as long as you have a D next to your name.
I think a future where democrats are strong enough to win back the house is a future where democrats are confident enough to pass a public option at minimum, and medicare for all at maximum.
Single payer may never happen, but it doesn't really need to happen to get to universal healthcare people can be happy with.
Have her polls stopped hemorrhaging?
I'd be happy to hear your argument. If you want to debate Hillary's record and that of the Obama administration on pro corporate legislation and bills including TPP, i'd be happy to hear your rebuttals.
Sanders is focusing on the issues, not personality politics. If anyone drags him into that realm, it'll be Hilary.
The GOP debates were more of a Bash Hillary contest than anything.
Why do you think that?
Sanders is focusing on the issues, not personality politics. If anyone drags him into that realm, it'll be Hilary.
I'd be happy to hear your argument. If you want to debate Hillary's record and that of the Obama administration on pro corporate legislation and bills including TPP, i'd be happy to hear your rebuttals.
Sanders consistently refuses to help cannibalize the democratic party. I have seen very many interviews where someone tried to get him to say something nasty about Hillary and he constantly says no.Why do you think that?
She hasn't really ever mentioned Sander's name, that I've heard of. She has no reason to do so. She's 20-30 points ahead of him nationally. she's not going to "attack" him. Of course, I've seen Sanders supporters start freaking out if someone doesn't 100% agree with him, so I'm waiting on Twitter to explode if she points out a point of difference between them.
They haven't been on a debate stage together until tonight. If it does begin, this is where it'll happen. If Hilary relentlessly goes after Sanders, especially on the Socialist stuff, that suggests that her dive in polls has spooked her, then the test will be on Sanders whether he decides to roll with the punches. I'm hoping he doesn't take the bait.
Sanders consistently refuses to help cannibalize the democratic party. I have seen very many interviews where someone tried to get him to say something nasty about Hillary and he constantly says no.
I read an article, I forget where but it is out there where his press secretary said he'll be focusing on issues. What those issues are I don't know, I hope the TPP gets a drop, but it seemed to be an article going with the angle that Sanders has no intention of locking horns with Hilary.
So basically if you hear the words "Mrs. Clinton's emails" come from Sanders mouth, he's fallen into the trap.
They haven't been on a debate stage together until tonight. If it does begin, this is where it'll happen. If Hilary relentlessly goes after Sanders, especially on the Socialist stuff, that suggests that her dive in polls has spooked her, then the test will be on Sanders whether he decides to roll with the punches. I'm hoping he doesn't take the bait.
Oh, I don't think Sanders wants to attack Clinton either. I just don't think Clinton will goad him into trying.
We'll see I guess.