• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Democratic National Primary Debate #1 |Tokyo2016| Rise of Mecha-Godzilla

GAF Definitive Conclusive Scientific Online Poll of Who Won


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Cheebo

Banned
Shouldn't he have decided by now? I'd think if you were serious about running for president, you'd decide and announce before the first debate...
Well his son just recently died and he said he still isn't over the grieving process.
 
T

thepotatoman

Unconfirmed Member
I think people underrate how much Webb and Chafee might bring to the discussion on national security, something Hillary and Bernie aren't really focused on at all.

I'd also say that Bernie is basically coming into this debate with the challenger advantage you usually see in the first debate against an incumbent president. Hillary has the aura of being presidential just by being a part of leadership for so long, but there's something about being put on the same stage right next to that person as a legitimize challenger which levels that perception out.

Hillary is a very competent debater though, so Bernie doesn't have room to slouch.
 

Cheebo

Banned
Is Hillary for Universal, single payer healthcare?

Humor me, how would such a policy get passed in a Republican congress when the more moderate Obamacare was barely able to pass in a Democratic one?


One candidate could be for giving everyone a billion dollars, but it would be silly to use that a voting criteria because it is not something that can happen.

Republicans control most of government. Most governors are republican, most senators, and most congressmen. You can't work around them. Even when Democrats held control of Congress there were enough moderate Democrats to make Obamacare something that only passed by the skin of its teeth, Obamacare was nearly too liberal to pass that non-Republican winning congress.

Full on single payer? That is 100% off the table. No question.

Any candidate can make dream world like empty promises, but you shouldn't base your vote on such.
 
If Sanders wants a chance at the nomination, tonight he needs to come out swinging and go straight for the jugular. Draw blood early, and just hammer away. If he can get Hillary on the defensive from the start and call her out on the issues he'll gain a ton of support.

This. Of course, adhering strictly to Marquess of Queensberry rules, Bernie should use this national spotlight to starkly highlight the real differences between their policies, hopefully yielding soundbites that the media simply cannot ignore. He will not waste a moment on Benghazi or email server's, as he has real issues to debate, that anyone outside of the GOP and Fox News, actually care about.

If, instead, he just repeats his policy positions, without adeptly contrasting them with Hillary's, he may well put the audience to sleep and will have wasted the potential of a good deal of free press, that he possibly cannot afford to squander.

Despite the OP's uncharacteristic GIF ;), I think Anderson is potentially the perfect host for the Democratic debate and hopefully he will inject just the right amount of good natured energy into the proceedings :).
 

Cheebo

Banned
Daniel B·;181522614 said:
This. Of course, adhering strictly to Marquess of Queensberry rules, Bernie should use this national spotlight to starkly highlight the real differences between their policies, hopefully yielding soundbites that the media simply cannot ignore. He will not waste a moment on Benghazi or email server's, as he has real issues to debate, that anyone outside of the GOP and Fox News, actually care about.

If, instead, he just repeats his policy positions, without adeptly contrasting them with Hillary's, he may well put the audience to sleep and will have wasted the potential of a good deal of free press, that he possibly cannot afford to squander.

Despite the OP's uncharacteristic GIF ;), I think Anderson is potentially the perfect host for the Democratic debate and hopefully he will inject just the right amount of good natured energy into the proceedings :).

He is not going to go after Hillary or attack her. Democratic Party is going to have a unified front unlike the GOP this go round.
 

Inuhanyou

Believes Dragon Quest is a franchise managed by Sony
Humor me, how would such a policy get passed in a Republican congress when the more moderate Obamacare was barely able to pass in a Democratic one?


One candidate could be for giving everyone a billion dollars, but it would be silly to use that a voting criteria because it is not something that can happen.

Republicans control most of government. Most governors are republican, most senators, and most congressmen. You can't work around them. Even when Democrats held control of Congress there were enough moderate Democrats to make Obamacare something that only passed by the skin of its teeth, Obamacare was nearly too liberal to pass that non-Republican winning congress.

Full on single payer? That is 100% off the table. No question.

Any candidate can make dream world like empty promises, but you shouldn't base your vote on such.

But these initiatives are important. Medicare for all would save us trillions. Tuition free schooling would save us a lot as well.Reformation of the tax code for all entities, infrastructure spending and Wall Street regulation initiatives as well.

If the major argument against Bernie's proposals is "they would not get passed cause GOP!" Then there's literally no difference between what people claim Clinton would do, because the GOP is also there in her way as well, if your one who believes she's a person who is legitimate.

There's literally nothing a president could do for liberal or socialist initiatives in our current environment.

So is your argument by definition to vote for Clinton because she would attempt to pass legislation that is pro corporation just to pass something? That's what Obama did with a majority of his tenure, the private industry is fully accommodated by his plans including TPP and even now they are not satisfied with what they get. So why exactly are we trying to compromise in a no win situation?

The better thing to do is to is educate people on the actual issues so they can actually move in support of these things instead of deflection.
 

RPGCrazied

Member
Please talk about gun control. It needs to be talked about seriously, republicans just want more guns, and blame every shooting on mentally ill people.
 
But what if Biden shows up? And announces his campaign at the debate? lol

He's gonna come out all JACK SWAGGER...

jack-swagger-titantron-o.gif


127628023151.gif


real-joe-biden-salutes-onion-joe-biden-1-23855-1358540241-0_big.jpg
 

B-Dubs

No Scrubs
Need a history lesson? Try 1993. It was a failure, which is probably why she's inclined towards supporting Obamacare now. Learning from the mistakes of aiming too high too quickly.

Yep. That shit blew up in her face in epic fashion. It's probably why she's a lot more pragmatic with her solutions these days.
 
Biden is going to turn out to be one of the no name guys. "Oh, you haven't heard of this politician before? That's because he doesn't exist!" *rips off Chaffe mask*
 
T

thepotatoman

Unconfirmed Member
Humor me, how would such a policy get passed in a Republican congress when the more moderate Obamacare was barely able to pass in a Democratic one?


One candidate could be for giving everyone a billion dollars, but it would be silly to use that a voting criteria because it is not something that can happen.

Republicans control most of government. Most governors are republican, most senators, and most congressmen. You can't work around them. Even when Democrats held control of Congress there were enough moderate Democrats to make Obamacare something that only passed by the skin of its teeth, Obamacare was nearly too liberal to pass that non-Republican winning congress.

Full on single payer? That is 100% off the table. No question.

Any candidate can make dream world like empty promises, but you shouldn't base your vote on such.

The democrats in the senate have shed off a lot on their right side of the party, mostly because a lot of them lost elections in Red states where they no longer care what you do as long as you have a D next to your name.

I think a future where democrats are strong enough to win back the house is a future where democrats are confident enough to pass a public option at minimum, and medicare for all at maximum.

Single payer may never happen, but it doesn't really need to happen to get to universal healthcare people can be happy with.
 

weekev

Banned
So as an outsider, this is pretty much the quest for the presidency right? You guys surely arent crazy enough to put any of the Republicans into the White House considering the front runners?
 

rjinaz

Member
Greta Van Susteren ‏@greta
CNN should invite @realDonaldTrump to debate-if they can invite a Socialist / Sanders to Dem debate, why not a Rep?

And I used to watch her show a lot, she used to make sense to me.

Though on the flipside, I honestly wouldn't mind seeing Trump debate with Democrats and Sanders debating with the Republicans.
 

B-Dubs

No Scrubs
So as an outsider, this is pretty much the quest for the presidency right? You guys surely arent crazy enough to put any of the Republicans into the White House considering the front runners?

No, the Dems would really need to fuck up for any of those nutters to make it to the White House.

Saying this is a contest is being a bit kind to Bernie though. Clinton is still very much in control of her own destiny right now. Short of a massive fuck up on her part, or Joe Biden jumping in, she has a stranglehold on the Obama coalition which makes her unbeatable. Anyone who wants to beat her will need to find a way to steal it away from her, which is easier said than done.

It's why I framed her as Mecha-Godzilla in the OP, and made Bernie the guy who dies half-way through the last Godzilla movie.
 

Machina

Banned
No, the Dems would really need to fuck up for any of those nutters to make it to the White House.

Saying this is a contest is being a bit kind to Bernie though. Clinton is still very much in control of her own destiny right now. Short of a massive fuck up on her part, or Joe Biden jumping in, she has a stranglehold on the Obama coalition which makes her unbeatable. Anyone who wants to beat her will need to find a way to steal it away from her, which is easier said than done.

It's why I framed her as Mecha-Godzilla in the OP, and made Bernie the guy who dies half-way through the last Godzilla movie.

Have her polls stopped hemorrhaging?
 
So as an outsider, this is pretty much the quest for the presidency right? You guys surely arent crazy enough to put any of the Republicans into the White House considering the front runners?

Are you really asking this after we elected Republicans to control a majority of the House, Senate, state legislatures, and governorships?
 

Wilsongt

Member
I highly doubt tonight's debate is going to be as circus-like and popcorn worthy as the GOP debates.

However, I look forward to seeing the right-wing and ConservaGAF's response.
 
I think of O'Malley goes after anyone it's going to be Sanders. There's no benefit to him going after Hillary. I also doubt Hillary or Sanders will go after each other. Hillary has no reason to do so, and Sanders would only hurt himself if he's seen as a bully. Hillary's quite good at debates, usually outperforming Obama by a wide margin. She can stay on message, and you won't trip her up. She knows her shit.

They'll point out whatever minuscule differences exist between them, and then Chafee will also be there. So good for him, I suppose.

Course, I've already seen the Sander supporters on other sites preemptively plan to flood Twitter with "HE WON!" regardless of how he performs. So........ya.
 

Inuhanyou

Believes Dragon Quest is a franchise managed by Sony
Strawman so big the fire would light the sky.

I'd be happy to hear your argument. If you want to debate Hillary's record and that of the Obama administration on pro corporate legislation and bills including TPP, i'd be happy to hear your rebuttals.
 

Machina

Banned
I think of O'Malley goes after anyone it's going to be Sanders. There's no benefit to him going after Hillary. I also doubt Hillary or Sanders will go after each other. Hillary has no reason to do so, and Sanders would only hurt himself if he's seen as a bully. Hillary's quite good at debates, usually outperforming Obama by a wide margin. She can stay on message, and you won't trip her up. She knows her shit.

They'll point out whatever minuscule differences exist between them, and then Chafee will also be there. So good for him, I suppose.

Course, I've already seen the Sander supporters on other sites preemptively plan to flood Twitter with "HE WON!" regardless of how he performs. So........ya.

Sanders is focusing on the issues, not personality politics. If anyone drags him into that realm, it'll be Hilary.
 
I think of O'Malley goes after anyone it's going to be Sanders. There's no benefit to him going after Hillary. I also doubt Hillary or Sanders will go after each other. Hillary has no reason to do so, and Sanders would only hurt himself if he's seen as a bully. Hillary's quite good at debates, usually outperforming Obama by a wide margin. She can stay on message, and you won't trip her up. She knows her shit.

They'll point out whatever minuscule differences exist between them, and then Chafee will also be there. So good for him, I suppose.

Course, I've already seen the Sander supporters on other sites preemptively plan to flood Twitter with "HE WON!" regardless of how he performs. So........ya.

This is probably the worst thing that is likely to happen. The Reddit brogressives will be hitting social media hardcore...oh how I hate them.
 

B-Dubs

No Scrubs
Have her polls stopped hemorrhaging?

They were never really hemorrhaging though. She just went from being 50 points up to ~25 points up among Registered Democrats, that was always going to happen once someone challenged her. Bernie's support among independents buoy his numbers when it comes to the big number that most places put out, but they can't vote in most primaries so you need to look at registered democrats to get a good idea as to how he's really doing. The answer to that is he's gone from ~5% to ~24%, but he's still down by a huge margin.

If Bernie wants to win he not only needs to be incredibly impressive in this debate, and all the following debates, but hope that Clinton also completely flubs every debate on the calendar.

He's got a chance at making it, but Clinton is still very much in charge of her own destiny.

Sanders is focusing on the issues, not personality politics. If anyone drags him into that realm, it'll be Hilary.

This ignore the fact that Hillary's strongest when it comes to specific policy, not personality politics. If she goes after him it will be with specific policy and exactly how she plans to get it past Congress and implement it.
 

Jonm1010

Banned
The democrats in the senate have shed off a lot on their right side of the party, mostly because a lot of them lost elections in Red states where they no longer care what you do as long as you have a D next to your name.

I think a future where democrats are strong enough to win back the house is a future where democrats are confident enough to pass a public option at minimum, and medicare for all at maximum.

Single payer may never happen, but it doesn't really need to happen to get to universal healthcare people can be happy with.

I've said it before but Switzerland is really the next major step this country needs to look toward. Switzerland with some targeted legislation to deal with some of our own unique problems. Add a public option to the exchange and/or mandate insurers operate as 401c3's with Switzerland style wage and price controls. Deal with the pharmaceutical, Hospital and doctors pricing.

From there we would actually see some major inroads at bending that cost curve Obama talked about. Then we can take the next step toward Medicare for all.
 
I'd be happy to hear your argument. If you want to debate Hillary's record and that of the Obama administration on pro corporate legislation and bills including TPP, i'd be happy to hear your rebuttals.

I'm not even sure what you're talking about right now. All I commented on was that you set up an argument to attack the he never made.

EDIT: The argument has and always will be, if their presidencies would look similar due to congressional fuckery, that we better make sure a Lib gets in for SCOTUS appointees as well as lower courts. I won't bother posting the numerous studies that show a candidate generally tries to accomplish what they run on. You've been shown that study and dismissed it plenty.
 

Machina

Banned
Why do you think that?

I read an article, I forget where but it is out there where his press secretary said he'll be focusing on issues. What those issues are I don't know, I hope the TPP gets a drop, but it seemed to be an article going with the angle that Sanders has no intention of locking horns with Hilary.

So basically if you hear the words "Mrs. Clinton's emails" come from Sanders mouth, he's fallen into the trap.
 
Sanders is focusing on the issues, not personality politics. If anyone drags him into that realm, it'll be Hilary.

She hasn't really ever mentioned Sander's name, that I've heard of. She has no reason to do so. She's 20-30 points ahead of him nationally. she's not going to "attack" him. Of course, I've seen Sanders supporters start freaking out if someone doesn't 100% agree with him, so I'm waiting on Twitter to explode if she points out a point of difference between them.
 
I'd be happy to hear your argument. If you want to debate Hillary's record and that of the Obama administration on pro corporate legislation and bills including TPP, i'd be happy to hear your rebuttals.

You're completely changing the argument from "is Sanders gonna be hamstrung by the GOP" to "evil Clinton/Obama and their pro corporate legislations".
 

Machina

Banned
She hasn't really ever mentioned Sander's name, that I've heard of. She has no reason to do so. She's 20-30 points ahead of him nationally. she's not going to "attack" him. Of course, I've seen Sanders supporters start freaking out if someone doesn't 100% agree with him, so I'm waiting on Twitter to explode if she points out a point of difference between them.

They haven't been on a debate stage together until tonight. If it does begin, this is where it'll happen. If Hilary relentlessly goes after Sanders, especially on the Socialist stuff, that suggests that her dive in polls has spooked her, then the test will be on Sanders whether he decides to roll with the punches. I'm hoping he doesn't take the bait.
 
They haven't been on a debate stage together until tonight. If it does begin, this is where it'll happen. If Hilary relentlessly goes after Sanders, especially on the Socialist stuff, that suggests that her dive in polls has spooked her, then the test will be on Sanders whether he decides to roll with the punches. I'm hoping he doesn't take the bait.

I would be genuinely surprised if she went after Sanders for being a socialist. It would seem out of place, especially since Sanders doesn't exactly run away from that description and would probably like the chance to tell everyone why it's not a bad thing. Realistically they agree on a lot of things, so I expect tonight will be more about differentiating themselves from the Republican candidates and the nuances between each other rather than attacking each other on anything.
 
Sanders consistently refuses to help cannibalize the democratic party. I have seen very many interviews where someone tried to get him to say something nasty about Hillary and he constantly says no.

I read an article, I forget where but it is out there where his press secretary said he'll be focusing on issues. What those issues are I don't know, I hope the TPP gets a drop, but it seemed to be an article going with the angle that Sanders has no intention of locking horns with Hilary.

So basically if you hear the words "Mrs. Clinton's emails" come from Sanders mouth, he's fallen into the trap.

Oh, I don't think Sanders wants to attack Clinton either. I just don't think Clinton will goad him into trying.

We'll see I guess.
 

B-Dubs

No Scrubs
They haven't been on a debate stage together until tonight. If it does begin, this is where it'll happen. If Hilary relentlessly goes after Sanders, especially on the Socialist stuff, that suggests that her dive in polls has spooked her, then the test will be on Sanders whether he decides to roll with the punches. I'm hoping he doesn't take the bait.

I seriously doubt she's that worried. Her drop in the polls had to be expected by her team, everyone watching knew that someone would pick up steam and be able to challenge her. We're not going to see her go on the attack in the way you're predicting, if anything she'll hit him on policy and how they plan on getting their respective plans through Congress. I wouldn't expect a circus like the GOP debates or a blow-for-blow like she had with Obama.
 

Machina

Banned
Oh, I don't think Sanders wants to attack Clinton either. I just don't think Clinton will goad him into trying.

We'll see I guess.

That's the question I'm most interested to see answered, because Hilary's attitude towards Sanders is the trigger for the rest of the election from the democratic side. If she loads the cannons, Sanders will see his chance and go for the rational old man approach and let Hilary make herself look desperate going up against a self proclaimed Socialist from Vermont.

If she goes the pacifist approach as you think, that makes the debate much more interesting and brings the issues they discuss right to the fore. If Sanders and Clinton get into a verbal debate about the TPP on stage in front of millions of viewers, that's a win for everyone.
 
If I were Clinton the last thing worrying me would be Bernie Sanders. It's the general election she has to worry about and guys like Ben Carson. Just look at the polling.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom