That's actually entirely fair. If two candidates are within the margin of error of each other, you don't have enough evidence to disprove the null hypothesis that they are tied.
Yeah I don't understand why that picture is supposed to be offensive. I'm sure if Romney was ahead with a lead lower than the margin, people would want that caveat pointed out.
Pointing out why someone is going to win based on facts, historic trends, party demographics, infrastructure, party support and logic isn't calling someone inevitable. It's simply showing why she's going to win.
Ok.