Pop-in does exist on XSX. It's no-where near as bad.
For my knowledge are there any 1080p 120hz TV? In my country is not a low end device. Here if you can buy it then you can buy an X or a PS5.
new argument unlocked = 540p looks good on 1080p
It was a half-serious response.Thnx for the sarcastic response.
Path Tracing is the most computationally expensive form of ray tracing.
Nope.
Series S is battling switch games in terms of resolution.
Ms should just release something like this with PS Vita screen (960x540) for Series S
The question is how much more money... In my case, if I pay just 14% more I get a dramatically better experience than Series S. It has more 120fps games in last-gen games, thanks to good BC support, but I'll trade that for a vastly better experience in upcoming next-gen games something the Series S will undoubtedly struggle to provide.
You mean this?
It's not just pushing it, it's pushing PS5 hard
Games looks good on Series X. Stays at 60 fps most of the time. All I'd need to enjoy this game.
No it could mean several things. You can improve your engine pipeline. You can use different AA solutions. For example, see how Sony games went from traditional AA done on the GPU to MLAA done on the cell. See how insomniac literally just doubled the ray traced reflections from 1080p to 4kcb just by doing optimizations. Did they take out tessellation like 4A games did from the xsx version? No. Did they lower the geometric detail? No. Did the game get a downgrade from its first reveal? No. Both versions ran at native 4k 30 fps and within 8 months, It literally got an upgrade because they were able to get more out of the system and their engine.
That's kinda awesome really! Makes me hopeful that triple screen RT can be doable, not suitable in this game I guess but if Forza Horizon 5 have RT on PC then holy crap it's gonna be looker!
I disagree.
Path Tracing is beyond these consoles and not worth bringing up.
Yes it is.
lightning is same (just lower resolution as general there is lower resolution)
Really? I am on a 1080p monitor right now and the DF video looks very blurry to me. I remember when I had a smallish 720p tv I bought for my PS3, I could immediately tell that sub 720p games like MGS4 and other third party games in year 1 did not look as clean as games like Ratchet and Uncharted Drake's Fortune. But it was when I upgraded to a 1080p screen that shimmering started to really become noticeable even in 720p games. I still remember bitching about Castlevania lords of shadow since it was far bigger in scope compared to GoW which was fairly linear and camera controlled. Anything further in the distance added shimmering that made everything look very very messy.
I don't know how anyone can in good faith can mention the Switch with any relation to the XSS. They platforms are doing completely different things and have completely different capabilities. You know what else has pop in? Star Fox on the Super Nintendo. You know what that has to do with the XSS? Nothing.
The real question is who is going to provide that extra money? Are you going to pay the difference? One of the biggest selling points of the XSS is it's low price point. Telling someone to pay more money for a more expensive device that offers less in terms of games that run at 120fps and doesn't offer a value like Game Pass isn't a real alternative. Perhaps you aren't the target audience for this device so if that's the case you have no more need for 'concern'.
They got so much stick for that quote.Well at least 4A warned everyone of what was to come:
Xbox Series S Could Present Challenges For Future Titles, Says Chief Technical Officer Of 4A Games
https://gamingbolt.com/xbox-series-s-could-present-challenges-for-future-titles-says-chief-technical-officer-of-4a-games 4A Games Chief Technical Officer Oleksandr Shyshkovtsov, the developer of the popular Metro series, was asked about the Series S. Specifically, he was asked if he thought the...www.neogaf.com
Def an improvement, but I don't think I've seen any native XSX or PS5 games with loading past 10-15 seconds. So 44 seconds seems unusually long. The PC version loaded in 27 seconds for example.
It reminds me of pop-in from another game, which happens to be on the Switch. Yeh?
Well at least 4A warned everyone of what was to come:
Xbox Series S Could Present Challenges For Future Titles, Says Chief Technical Officer Of 4A Games
https://gamingbolt.com/xbox-series-s-could-present-challenges-for-future-titles-says-chief-technical-officer-of-4a-games 4A Games Chief Technical Officer Oleksandr Shyshkovtsov, the developer of the popular Metro series, was asked about the Series S. Specifically, he was asked if he thought the...
They could've locked the game at 30 fps and it would easily run at 1080p or even above in some cases. They chose frame rate over resolution though. Framerate is king?Correct me if I'm wrong but I don't believe there's a single ray tracing capable GPU that has as few teraflops as the Series S.
These are the requirements for the enhanced edition of metro exodus EE:
The Series S is below the minimum specs here.
Saying "oh but PC's" doesn't fly on this occasion.
That thread is a travesty. The level of ignorance is out of this world.
How do you see things going as we get further into the generation?
Nah, I am with Stuart on this. Those other games are just doing ray traced reflections. This game is literally built around ray tracing. Every single light source is ray traced. That is way more computationally expensive than ray traced reflections which are at times completely missing from scenes depending on the setting. For example, Ratchet has levels that are wide open fields. No glass or reflective surfaces in sight. The only thing the game uses ray tracing for in those levels is ratchet's suit and clank's body and robotic enemies if you run into them. That's it.
