[DF] Halo Infinite on Consoles: Xbox Series X/S vs Xbox One S/X - Can Xbox One Run It?
- Thread starter Lunatic_Gamer
- Start date
- Analysis
Riky
$MSFT
Look at the mountains and trees bottom left, that's why they say Series X has the same settings as Series S at DF.
DarkMage619
$MSFT
Pretty durn impressive for a $300 console. I want to see it use some SFS.
Look at the mountains and trees bottom left, that's why they say Series X has the same settings as Series S at DF.
Riky
$MSFT
Exactly the 30fps mode is pointless really, people will play the version that holds the best framerate of the two which is Series S.
ethomaz
Banned
Are you sure?
Look at the mountains and trees bottom left, that's why they say Series X has the same settings as Series S at DF.
The detail level is similar between XB1X and SeriesS… inferior to SeriesX like DF stated.
BTW the LOD quality is the same between XB1X and Series X… tinned down in Series S.
Last edited:
Riky
$MSFT
You blind? Just count the trees in the bottom left of the shot, use your fingers if necessary.
ethomaz
Banned
Read the dam article and stop to see things that only exists in your head.
DF said the opposite of what are you trying to say.
BTW count again the three… Series X has way more than both.
Last edited:
Riky
$MSFT
I've posted a screenshot, you can see it with your own eyes, there are more trees in the bottom left and more details on the mountains, denying that is just making you look stupid.
"Not only that, Series X also uses the occasionally higher-grade textures seen on Series S."
dcmk7
Banned
Scary what delusion does to people. Ignoring all the other evidence available out there because they are unable to accept it. Sad.
Riky
$MSFT
ethomaz
Banned
You pic shows more three in the Series X version…I've posted a screenshot, you can see it with your own eyes, there are more trees in the bottom left and more details on the mountains, denying that is just making you look stupid.
"Not only that, Series X also uses the occasionally higher-grade textures seen on Series S."
Said that yes I quoted the part that occasionally Series S uses better texture but most of time it uses the same texture quality as XB1X.
You are still in denial lol
Last edited:
dcmk7
Banned
Spamming a cherry picked picture? You did similiar when you had your last breakdown and actually got banned for spamming.Someone else who can't count, not surprised really. Have a real good look.
Digital Foundry article actually paints the entire picture, unfortunately for you.
Riky
$MSFT
We're talking about Xbox One X and Series S, look at the mountains and then look in the bottom left at the amount of trees, are you seriously denying what your eyes are showing you?
ethomaz
Banned
Hint look at the middle left of the pic BOOMSomeone else who can't count, not surprised really. Have a real good look.
LordOfChaos
Member
I saw the Halofollower review and immediately thought it looked way more potato than normal. Kinda rough on XBO.
ethomaz
Banned
I'm denying what?
The whole video and article says what I posted and you keep trying to create a false narrative since first post.
I made even a summary that is factually correct.
Just because you made a false claim that people corrected you doesn't mean you can foul everybody to think otherwise lol
Last edited:
S0ULZB0URNE
Member
Riky
$MSFT
It does, one holds its framerate better than the other and has a higher minimum resolution.
dcmk7
Banned
For visual image? Somehow yes.
Gamerguy84
Member
S0ULZB0URNE
Member
Riky
$MSFT
Not really.
Xbox One X runs at generally higher resolution as expected over Series S.
Series S has some higher grade textures, keeps to 60fps better with One X dipping into the forties, loads a lot quicker. Series S doesn't drop as low resolution wise as One X in performance mode.
S0ULZB0URNE
Member
Haven't had a chance to play yet but is Ray Tracing in yet?
M1chl
Currently Gif and Meme Champion
Craig worked out a lot it seems, since the last time we saw him.We have this guy now.
Leyasu
Banned
What? A bug or just 343?
S0ULZB0URNE
Member
You must not of watched the video.
Good news is... footnotes are in the OP.
ethomaz
Banned
There is no Ray-tracing yet.
Spukc
always chasing the next thrill
dcmk7
Banned
We have this guy now.
Why does Pharrell have breasts?
Riky
$MSFT
They say all the things I just said.
HeisenbergFX4
Member
I think its 343 as a lot of stuff is missing even after all this time in the oven, still enjoying it though
Skifi28
Member
Kacho
Member
What the actual fuck?We have this guy now.
S0ULZB0URNE
Member
Wow.
Nice reflections are in multiplayer as is.
I wouldn't mind those types of reflections if it keeps performance for the single player.
dcmk7
Banned
FrankWza
Member
Leyasu
Banned
I was playing it earlier. It is pretty good so far and looks decent enough on the XsX. But damn 343 are pushing out a game that I don't consider finished.
S0ULZB0URNE
Member
HeisenbergFX4
Member
I agree as I am playing it at 120 hz and not finished describes it pretty well.
Even the resolution drops at 120 is quite noticeable imo but it is fairly smooth even if I havent hit the areas of low frames yet
dcmk7
Banned
They dropped it since was dipping to 510p IIRC.Plus this:
But that mode has been getting dropped regularly before now.
Riky
$MSFT
Nah just quoting facts.
Xbox One X has framepacing issues in quality mode.
Xbox One X drops frames in performance mode into the forties.
Series S doesn't have these issues.
"Similar to the base machine, its 30fps cap isn't quite as good as it should be with frame-time stutter causing problems"
"Expect a 45fps-60fps range, depending on just how taxing the battle scenes are."
"The pay-off is a mostly perfect 60fps. Across all of our capture, there's barely a lurch into the 50fps region to report on. Sacrificing a more dynamic 1080p to hit and crucially to sustain 60fps seems to work out just fine."
Last edited:
dcmk7
Banned
The fact that it's even debatable is pretty interesting.
Next gen consoles, after all, should be significant improvements.
When in fact according to DF, X1X equals and is even superior in many aspects of the game.
Truly bizarre, especially on a flagship title.
HoofHearted
Member
Is that Marques Brownlee?We have this guy now.
HeisenbergFX4
Member
The quotes from this review, make of it what you will.
Moving on Xbox Series S, there's a twist: looking at the quality mode, Series S image quality is markedly inferior to Xbox One X. The dynamic 4K of One X drops down a locked 1080p instead, with the same 30fps target. In truth, this looks like a heavy cut-back and we'd hope to see an upgrade to 1440p at some point for Series S. Settings-wise, near-to-far foliage draw is identical between One X and Series S, as is the quality of texture filtering, depth of field, and even shadows are comparable. There are differences however, if minor: trees render slightly further towards the distance on Xbox One X, but it's a subtle change. Texture quality is very similar too, albeit a touch more blurry on Series S owing to the lower resolution. However, there are some scenarios where Series S appears to have the better of the old machine in assets but even so, Xbox One X is the sharper and cleaner of the two by running at a dynamic 4K. There are examples of actual texture quality - floor mapping at select spawn points - differing between the generations - one that may well favour Series S overall.
Series S' performance mode? Again, generally speaking, it's operating at a lower resolution than Xbox One X, even if its dynamic resolution lower bounds is higher and overall performance is more solid. The resolution window here varies from 1706x960 to the full 1920x1080. Variable rate shading is also used here - adjusting the resolution of points of the image, in theory helping to bolster performance. The pay-off is a mostly perfect 60fps. Across all of our capture, there's barely a lurch into the 50fps region to report on. Sacrificing a more dynamic 1080p to hit and crucially to sustain 60fps seems to work out just fine.
Moving on Xbox Series S, there's a twist: looking at the quality mode, Series S image quality is markedly inferior to Xbox One X. The dynamic 4K of One X drops down a locked 1080p instead, with the same 30fps target. In truth, this looks like a heavy cut-back and we'd hope to see an upgrade to 1440p at some point for Series S. Settings-wise, near-to-far foliage draw is identical between One X and Series S, as is the quality of texture filtering, depth of field, and even shadows are comparable. There are differences however, if minor: trees render slightly further towards the distance on Xbox One X, but it's a subtle change. Texture quality is very similar too, albeit a touch more blurry on Series S owing to the lower resolution. However, there are some scenarios where Series S appears to have the better of the old machine in assets but even so, Xbox One X is the sharper and cleaner of the two by running at a dynamic 4K. There are examples of actual texture quality - floor mapping at select spawn points - differing between the generations - one that may well favour Series S overall.
Series S' performance mode? Again, generally speaking, it's operating at a lower resolution than Xbox One X, even if its dynamic resolution lower bounds is higher and overall performance is more solid. The resolution window here varies from 1706x960 to the full 1920x1080. Variable rate shading is also used here - adjusting the resolution of points of the image, in theory helping to bolster performance. The pay-off is a mostly perfect 60fps. Across all of our capture, there's barely a lurch into the 50fps region to report on. Sacrificing a more dynamic 1080p to hit and crucially to sustain 60fps seems to work out just fine.