Great is a meaningful word when doing an objective analyze. If 1440p with crap AA is great what is 4k+ with better AA??Brother, just because 8k is better than 4k doesn't mean 4k can't be great
You are choosing to adopt such a weird point of view. That's like saying having sex with a supermodel isn't great because hotter women exist.
very greatGreat is a meaningful word when doing an objective analyze. If 1440p with crap AA is great what is 4k+ with better AA??
More like 1440p is more than good enough for most people, who happen to not have TVs the size of a wall.Great is a meaningful word when doing an objective analyze. If 1440p with crap AA is great what is 4k+ with better AA??
So on emulator is better in terms of resolution, IQ, etc...very great
What most people think it is good enough is irrelevant for stuff like resolution and IQ. More = better. Period.More like 1440p is more than good enough for most people, who happen to not have TVs the size of a wall.
It's a console, after all.
Great is a meaningful word when doing an objective analyze. If 1440p with crap AA is great what is 4k+ with better AA??
They are video files. Even on emulator they are locked in resolution and frame rate.The cutscenes are still in 30fps it looks like, looks choppy in comparison of the rest of the game
Yeah, we know, and we also don't care because it looks great to us even if it doesn't to youSo on emulator is better in terms of resolution, IQ, etc...
What most people think it is good enough is irrelevant for stuff like resolution and IQ. More = better. Period.
Good for you. The thread is about what looks better, not what you care or not.Yeah, we know, and we also don't care because it looks great to us even if it doesn't to you
It really isn't. This thread is about the DF review..Good for you. The thread is about what looks better, not what you care or not.
That is about what looks better on the SW2.It really isn't. This thread is about the DF review..
both people who keep arguing this happen to live in Brazil. I really think it's an education/language issue at this pointWait a second....you guys are trying to tell me that a PC running this game with mods on expensive PC hardware looks better than the version that runs on a $450 handheld?!?!
I have only tried out TOTK so far, but it's a pretty solid upgrade. The main issue (on a technical level) I had with the game was the inconsistent framerate which seems to be rock solid now.
Read my comment again, I'm not talking about emulation, I'm talking about development: this level of scaling, including textures, is typical of a standard PC release. As a paid port, they could have made amendments and optimisations at the code level to improve things like shadow and object pop-in and image stability. They didn't, they put the same code on more powerful hardware and scaled it accordingly, much as you can do with a standard PC release. That to me is cash-grabby.Of course anything on PC will surpass consoles version, but this is a case where it's not a clear winner, as the game have way higher res textures than what you can get by emulating Switch 1 version on PC so you would still miss that and, believe me, the newer textures are just as important as the improved resolution and frame rate for the Switch 2 version looking so good
Yeah, maybe it is, but we don't care, it's now finally good enough and we're happy with it.Read my comment again, I'm not talking about emulation, I'm talking about development: this level of scaling, including textures, is typical of a standard PC release. As a paid port, they could have made amendments and optimisations at the code level to improve things like shadow and object pop-in and image stability. They didn't, they put the same code on more powerful hardware and scaled it accordingly, much as you can do with a standard PC release. That to me is cash-grabby.