Zheph
Member
I don't think you can play offline at allDo you need a pus plus subscrption to play solo offline?
I don't think you can play offline at allDo you need a pus plus subscrption to play solo offline?
I am holding off on this one. So many issues with review stuff and confusion, save wipes, and connections. The closer we got, the more things got jumbled and then it bumped up against 3 indie games I promised to review so I said screw it.
Then add it to the OP, please.
Oof, banned again. Anyways Diablo 3 campaign was shittastic. I beat the game and never looked back.Can't be any fucking worse than D3. I hated that story campaign. Going from the beta what we saw of the story campaign it will be a million times more interesting.
Looks like it’s going to be you after all.
back up to 89 now. Its going to change a little has more reviews come in.Then add it to the OP, please.
I play d2r to this very day so not nostalgia, and yup i enjoyed d3 a lot, but only with reaper of souls xpack and only for first 300h when i maxed everything out on every classThe problem is, most ppl who played D2 at the time it came out have a very different view on it. At the time it was all pretty new, and there were not many games around like it. Those people have serious nostalgia for it, which blinds a lot of people. I played hundreds of hours of Goldeneye on N64, but playing the recent re-release was only cool for reliving those gaming memories, its been done much better since but no shooter rivals that feeling I had playing it on release on the 64.
No, what Draugoth said is correct, you don't need PS Plus or XBL Gold.Really? Awww man I hate games that force you to be online even when you are playing offline...ugh...but i still think I'll buy it after seeing these scores.
You can play solo without paying for any online service (PS+ or Xbox Live). You only need to be connected to the internet.I don't think you can play offline at all
Nah, this is like Baby Journalist mode compared to D2 Act 1 Normal.Your opinion is your opinion and if it's not fun for you, that's fine. But how can you say it doesn't lack challenge? You basically played the equivalent of Diablo 2 Act 1 normal. And yeah, D2 Act1 normal ain't a challenge either.
Then the beta completely failed to showcase any of that. There was no strategic thinking or methodical planning. It was just face to keyboard and maybe using a healing potion every few hours.Build variety is very good here. Also is a lot more methodical and strategic now.
Review hyperbole probably won’t age well. We’ll have a better idea in a couple weeks when people have had significant time with it.The best diablo oh fuck off
I LOVE d2 and d3 each in their own way. But to spout shit like this i need a minimum of 200 hours
And 1 year of patches
I don't think you can play offline at all
What? I never played Diablo but I always thought these games were single players with optional co-op, why it needs to be online only? Are they MMOs or GaaS games?You can play solo without paying for any online service (PS+ or Xbox Live). You only need to be connected to the internet.
No couch coop on PC, thats right.Still no couch coop for PC right? If not, deal breaker for me and gonna buy on PS5.
Thank you Jesus for not sucking balls.
Online so they can control what you do, instantly change drop rates, and push MTX/BP/Seasons. It is fucking retarded. It sucked with D3 and it sucks here. As for is D4 a GAAS? Yes. Yes it is.What? I never played Diablo but I always thought these games were single players with optional co-op, why it needs to be online only? Are they MMOs or GaaS games?
why is it so hard make offline mode optional? I mean Souls series also has online features but you always have the option to play them completely offline, why other can’t do the same?
D2 content creator Dbrunski gives his thoughts
Says upgrading your stuff during the campaign is pointless. Figured D4 would be a lot like D3 in that regard. Early game is basically pointless. Just rush to the end so you can play the real game.
D2 content creator Dbrunski gives his thoughts
Says upgrading your stuff during the campaign is pointless. Figured D4 would be a lot like D3 in that regard. Early game is basically pointless. Just rush to the end so you can play the real game.
D2 content creator Dbrunski gives his thoughts
Says upgrading your stuff during the campaign is pointless. Figured D4 would be a lot like D3 in that regard. Early game is basically pointless. Just rush to the end so you can play the real game.
D2 content creator Dbrunski gives his thoughts
Says upgrading your stuff during the campaign is pointless. Figured D4 would be a lot like D3 in that regard. Early game is basically pointless. Just rush to the end so you can play the real game.
Online so they can control what you do, instantly change drop rates, and push MTX/BP/Seasons. It is fucking retarded. It sucked with D3 and it sucks here. As for is D4 a GAAS? Yes. Yes it is.
Why are you in this thread making up stuff that makes no sense? Trolls coming out of the woodworks I see.Reviewers also gave D3 high scores and look how that turned out. I would suggest waiting a week or two to see what the community thinks properly and not jump to conclusions from mindless "journalists" and console warring fanboys.
Online so they can control what you do, instantly change drop rates, and push MTX/BP/Seasons. It is fucking retarded. It sucked with D3 and it sucks here. As for is D4 a GAAS? Yes. Yes it is.
Tradition I guess. The sense of having a character journey, even if it's all an illusion. Vanilla D3 didn't have that problem obviously, but when I play a new season in D3 I'm always looking for a boost to 70 so I can bypass the early game.Why even have the "early game" if it is completely pointless? This is why they should allow the player to choose whatever difficulty they want and reward the player for playing on harder difficulties from the outset. Get them into the core loop faster, instead of wasting the player's time with needless/pointless filler.
Yep. Seems to have the same system that D3 had where it would feed you upgrades regularly. Didn't get something in an hour? Boom here you go!I mean just based on the stress test, they give you leveled equipment with open arms lol. Upgrading is probably pointless unless you REALLY want to keep something leveled.
5:00. Look at the timestamps in the description.Where does he say this?
Thank you as decent is good enough for me as I don't care what is overpowered this week is likely nerfed next week I just didn't want to feel totally gimped at end game.Barb felt decent, I played on T1 on Hardcore. T2 is NOT worth it early game, T2 is only good when you're making a second character and you already have a to of extra talent points earned from the renown by doing dungeons/lilith shrines. The real game begins around level 50 after you hit Tier 3, that's where the REAL BIG upgrades come in.
Managed to kill the Butcher TWICE on hardcore with my Barbarian, but I had a very defensive build with Call of the Ancients carrying the damage. Barbarian/Rogue will be my 2 mains.
Never played a Diablo game before. Kinda want to get this, but I feel like it would ruin my life.
Same, i'm genuinely entertained by the Diablo story.
Oh okay. The item upgrade thing. I'm not that mad about it. That was basically the same in d3. He also says the campaign is awesome and that's my primary use for this game.5:00. Look at the timestamps in the description.
This one is kinda both yeah..Are they MMOs or GaaS games?
Yep. Has zero purpose existing. It is why I am waiting to see the general community for Diablo's views after many players get 100-300 hours into it before I pull the trigger or not. Beta was shit, but I also thought the same for a few other games that I ended up really enjoying. However between the terrible Beta, the awful MTX (fuck off "its only cosmetic" folks), the Battle Pass, and the Always Online? Not looking good. Reviewers also have had very little in terms of trust these past few years. Again, Diablo 3 was supposedly just as good in their eyes.