benjipwns
Banned
Why else would they want to block any Democratic candidate from access to voter data? That should be open to the entire party, not only the declared presumptive nominee before a single vote is cast just because.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
DNC suspends Sanders campaign access to database after staff breached Hillary's data
- Thread starter Cerium
- Start date
- Status
Yeah I guess you are right that I inteprent this differently than others would. I just add up the bombings, special ops in Syria and call for even more action to come to my conclusion.
And_Gignac
Member
I blame Reddit for this.
They shouldn't punish his campaign like that if measures have been already taken to fire the perpetrator(s). Typical DNC, tho.
They shouldn't punish his campaign like that if measures have been already taken to fire the perpetrator(s). Typical DNC, tho.
Bam Bam Baklava
Member
All of which is already happening to some degree within the Obama admin. I just don't understand this idea that Clinton is going to sway the Democratic party to suddenly become warmongers or that Clinton herself is interested in getting stuck with another Iraq war situation.
Don't worry, it's gonna be Trump.
Wafflecakes
Member
Oh please. If the roles were reversed and it was Hillary's campaign that had breached the files they would be calling for her head.
You think Bernie should get off completely unpunished for such a breach?
YES!!! It's gonna be great!
Dixon's Jet
Banned
I will admit that at this rate, Hillary will be the next President. We'd better begin preparing for it whatever our stances.
GiantEnemyGoomba
Member
First she kills that Benghazi dude and now she is planting double agents to take down Bernie?????
This is voter data that the Clinton campaign spent the money and work hours gathering. Odds are that it would have been shared or licensed to the Sanders campaign in the event that Sanders win the nomination, but we're not there yet and stealing your rival's work to further your own is generally frowned upon.
Monocle
Member
Oooooooops.
I heard she used to subsist on a diet of nothing but raw meat, fresh from the living animal. Now she's vegan, so she simply mauls the beasts with her teeth and arranges their innards and ruddy bones in pleasing shapes on her table.
With her bare hands! Utterly savage.
I heard she used to subsist on a diet of nothing but raw meat, fresh from the living animal. Now she's vegan, so she simply mauls the beasts with her teeth and arranges their innards and ruddy bones in pleasing shapes on her table.
eBay Huckster
Member
Man, it's really gonna be one hell of a show when he winds up winning both party nominations
Ninja Of Chaos
Member
What?
benjipwns
Banned
Hillary's going to be in jail*, Democrats have made clear they hate Bernie Sanders for opposing the power of elites and Martin O'Malley is a non-starter.
*that ones free retro
nephilimdj
Member
Dont worry reddit will fix this by brigading any polls about the issue
andthebeatgoeson
Junior Member
More like, 'Do Not!', said Clinton.
timetokill
Banned
once again hillary's data security is incredibly poor
Vigilant Walrus
Member
I did. And the size of the organization changes nothing. In many ways Bernies campaign organization is a grass root organization run by normal political activist.
It's beyond me that you're trying to deflect this with semantics. You must be able to see the hypocrisy.
Would it really surprise anyone considering the corrupt, vile woman in charge of the DNC? Debbie Wasserman Schultz is the worst politician in America.
SilentRacoon
Member
She proves yet again she can't keep anything safe, if she wins the White House might as well start using outlook for all official communications.
teruterubozu
Member
Oooo, I like that spin. Leaky Clinton.
UnemployedVillain
Member
LOL. You can't honestly believe these are equivalent, can you? One is a small organization of hired staffers versus a huge decentralized organization of activists. They're not even remotely the same. The "tangible proof" is the access logs. Can't get more tangible than that
Vigilant Walrus
Member
As I said before, the size of the organization doesn't make the overall arching point mute. It jarring to see the level of double standards here. Organizational size is completely off the fucking point. Absolutely irrelevant.
Either you generalize in your petty reductionistic ways without a modicum of proof, or you don't. It's pretty simple.
Ragnarsson
Member
How long before Fox News somehow spins this story, raising questions about unsecured info and if the Democrats can keep any information safe?
Sho_Nuff82
Member
I can't tell if this is sarcasm.
Thunder Monkey
Banned
My facebook feed has been interesting this season.
Almost as much "Hillary is a warmonger in the pockets of big banks" as "Hillary is a gun control loving communist liberal."
And then huge swathes of "First woman president! Lets make Hillary 2016 happen!"
Meh... Kansas.
Eighty Deuce
Banned
They wiped the servers with a cloth, Bernie is good to go.
Man some of you are really starting to sound like the far right circa 4 years ago with this shit. Every time you are presented with data you don't like, there's some grand fucking conspiracy. For your own good you may want to pop that bubble, it's only going to make it harder on your when reality comes 'crashing through the night' at you.
Do you... have any idea how american politics work? You don't seem to understand that Bernie has not won the nom. What you are asking here makes no sense. I don't know how to address this without sounding condescending.
You got baited. benjipwns is actually well versed in politics, he just also happens to be crazy.
When you see Chairman Meow, just humor him
Isn't much of that public? I mean, aren't some of her major donors the banks? That wasn't secret information, and that's not even considering the "cut it out" bullshit she said.
I would say, it's not really Bernie, but rather the poor decision of his data director and whoever else thought they should skim off the top of Hillary's campaign data. In 30 minutes, most likely they thought they could grab Hillary's Iowa/NH info and then run through the procedure of informing the DNC.
You would think the data director would have some tech savvy to know that their access is going to be traced though.
Not really surprised to see that Sanders is just as much an untrustworthy politician as any other. I mean, this is a man that only has become a Democrat when it's convenient, but otherwise hasn't helped the party or helped elect down ballot Democrats at all - why should he care about following their rules after all?
The Technomancer
card-carrying scientician
I reaaaaaaally doubt that Bernie himself "gave the order" to exploit the glitch. I mean, I'm in camp Clinton broadly speaking but I really hope this is a temporary measure while stuff gets sorted out and his campaign gets database access back within the week
Ziltoidia 9
Member
Most importantly, was Clinton's data base on a private server?
The server was located in Benghazi.
Where is Ben Gozzi though! We still have to find out!
Davey Cakes
Member
Well, they really screwed the pooch on this one.
Small errors in judgment can have a huge impact, unfortunately.
Small errors in judgment can have a huge impact, unfortunately.
Dude Abides
Banned
I can understand the temptation. Hillary,s voter data is probably a lot more robust and sophisticated than Sanders'.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
- Locked