But PS3 used software emulation for the original PlayStation and could play anything.No bc they don’t own the rights or have a license to use those games
There are a lot of gems out there from the previous gens and honestly if it wasn’t for emulation I probably wouldn’t be gaming as much as I do. But I’m one of those people that’s in the minority that loves playing older games.A lot of people feel backwards compatibility should be built in and that Sony is disrespecting PlayStations past.
I think it actually had unique hardware in it to run everything. This is why only early PS3 models could do that.But PS3 used software emulation for the original PlayStation and could play anything.
For me personally I like a gaming laptop better than a steam deck since it’s a bigger screen, I can play with gamepads and it does PS3 emulation very well. Plus I can play modern games at better performance than a deck.Get a Steam Deck, emulation is golden up to PS3. And theres massive github pages will the whole playstation catalogue. Why would SONY do that when they can play on the nostalgia and sell you a handful of old titles for $20+?
PS4 and PS5 can’t even read CDs they don’t have the laserShame I can’t just pop a PS1 disc into my PS5 and run it
Then why you asking for SONY to make you pay for all those all over again?For me personally I like a gaming laptop better than a steam deck since it’s a bigger screen, I can play with gamepads and it does PS3 emulation very well. Plus I can play modern games at better performance than a deck.
For handheld gaming I have a switch for that.
if they had the whole libraries on a PS5 console that came with a subscription that was decently priced I would most defintely.Then why you asking for SONY to make you pay for all those all over again?
Is that a 4K Blu-ray player issue in general?Then why you asking for SONY to make you pay for all those all over again?
John “Mr Potato Head” Linneman disagrees. He says jailbroken PS4s can play CDs.PS4 and PS5 can’t even read CDs they don’t have the laser
That’s not true because all PS3 consoles can play original PlayStation games straight from the disc, including the last super slim, it was software emulation.I think it actually had unique hardware in it to run everything. This is why only early PS3 models could do that.
if they had the whole libraries on a PS5 console that came with a subscription that was decently priced I would most defintely.
Nah fuck all that PC it is than if it’s at that price.Over 10.000 games (ps1,Ps2, PSP, PSvita)? A decent price? Maybe if $500 a month sounds like a steal.
They haven't done that.Nope, they will just re-release the game at full price
They have done that, in the case of PSP.rather than come up with a way that lets us play our ps3/psp/vita purchases
The only thing is PS1 games look like trash on PS3 and it’s a much better experience on duckstation.No so do it yourself. Get a modded BC PS3 + a Vita and you can play everything.
Consoles playing unrecognized game software apps by the home screen will just never, ever happen again.But PS3 used software emulation for the original PlayStation and could play anything.
They only look bad if you're using a CRT. I recently played through Ape Escape on a small 720p tv and it looked perfectly fine.The only thing is PS1 games look like trash on PS3 and it’s a much better experience on duckstation.
You would never get that amount of content for whatever "decent" price you have in your head right now. Without including PS4 that would be around 14,000 titles. The licensing alone would put it in the $100s per month.if they had the whole libraries on a PS5 console that came with a subscription that was decently priced I would most defintely.
Which sucks that Sony didn’t just put emulation for backwards compatibility in the first place. Only way your getting those older titles now if there is demand for it or a remaster since now Sony is monetizing everything.You would never get that amount of content for whatever "decent" price you have in your head right now. Without including PS4 that would be around 14,000 titles. The licensing alone would put it in the $100s per month.
Sky Gunner is on PS5 right now...Which sucks that Sony didn’t just put emulation for backwards compatibility in the first place. Only way your getting those older titles now if there is demand for it or a remaster since now Sony is monetizing everything.
I still have my PS3 fat backwards compatibility with cfw. I mean I love it but it would be nice if Sony would allow these libraries for the minimalist without the need of having your living room looking like a trader Joes of older consoles.They only look bad if you're using a CRT. I recently played through Ape Escape on a small 720p tv and it looked perfectly fine.
Who is releasing singular PS1, PS2, PSP, Vita, and PS3 games at 69.99?Nope, they will just re-release the game at full price
I mean the closest we've got to that was PSVita TV. Where it actually all worked for PS1/PSP/Vita libraries.Do think this will ever be possible with future consoles? Or will PC emulation be the only way to access the full libraries?
1440p on the Deck? ;PIm playing Gran Turismo 3 and Burnout 3, Silent Hill 3, THPS3, Tekken 5 etc widescreen support, 60fps 1440P. I dont need SONY:
Licensing lawyers don't care what emulator 'can' do. See that Vita example above - the machine was compatible with all PS1/PSP games on PSN - but was restricted from downloading or playing some of them due to licensing. One time a glitch in PSN removed said restriction so all of the library worked - for a spell. Ie. there were never compatibility issues - but Sony just wasn't allowed to it, legally.But PS3 used software emulation for the original PlayStation and could play anything.
If you play those games in software mode they work like a charm on PCSX2. Say what you want but PS2 still has the goat catalogue of games out of all the PlayStations. It’s a shame that you only get to play sprinkles on the PS5.I mean the closest we've got to that was PSVita TV. Where it actually all worked for PS1/PSP/Vita libraries.
Will they ever do it again? Doesn't seem like they care much for the approach
I guess the better question is if we'll have a FPGA PS2 before we get Sony to do this again ;P
1440p on the Deck? ;P
But actually the particular selection of games is still annoyingly - not great on PCSX2 - BO and SH3 are a compatibility mess, GT3 was having random glitches last time I tried it too, but maybe that's finally fixed. Though more importantly there's the issues with input latency on PCSX2 that - impair the experience somewhat even when compatibility is great.
Licensing lawyers don't care what emulator 'can' do. See that Vita example above - the machine was compatible with all PS1/PSP games on PSN - but was restricted from downloading or playing some of them due to licensing. One time a glitch in PSN removed said restriction so all of the library worked - for a spell. Ie. there were never compatibility issues - but Sony just wasn't allowed to it, legally.