Do you want to see a return to World War 2?

Teknoman said:
I'd play another WWII game if it was set up with BF3 level graphics/destruction/vehicle based battles.
We need a Battlefield 1944.

Raistlin said:
Civil War or Revolutionary War would be interesting imo.
The rate of fire is far too low and the typical battle is too boring. I don't want to stand in a line and shoot two rounds a minute.
 
Mikey Jr. said:
That was pretty much the game I was thinking of when creating this topic. BF3 graphics/engine but in WWII era.

*drools*
I still like my idea here.
gunbo13 said:
Time for another Wolfenstein remake to kick things off.

return-to-castle-wolfenstein.jpg


+

CryEngine3

I'd buy it
 
i want a pirate fps

swords, muskets, blunderbusses, pistols, cannons, (obviously a few liberties need to be taken to make guns fun) pilot-able pirate ships. drivable horse carriages w/ cannons on back, deadly on map hazards like Krakens, tribesmen, British navy ships, whirlpools. giant island battlefields with traps, and treasure stores that need to be controlled.

domination game types, capture gold stores. the team with the most gold at the end wins.

different forces to play as. honorable pirates, British navy forces, evil pirates, east India trading company bounty hunters, Davy Jones baddies. each force has their own special type of weapons.

different classes, like scouts, riflemen, swordsmen, heavy weapons, medics.

destructible port towns and pirate ships.

basically battlefield pirates. i would buy it day 1.
 
The WW2 section of Black Ops was my favorite part of the campaign.

I grew up on WW2 shooters, so while I've definitely been bored of them before, I wouldn't mind another one.
 
I hope for the next big WWII game they actually get the storming the beaches section right. I hate when you can only go one way. I should be able to get there however I want. If I want to charge the MG nest I should.
 
Brothers in Arms done right + Frostbite 2? Yeah, I'd bite.

Wouldn't want the same COD mold we've gotten used to up to this point though. Innovate or let it die.

I think a lot of the reason modern shooters are popular is that modern gun porn is just better. A World War II shooter made nowadays should make sure that the weapons feel and sound very lethal.
 
I'd like something different than "modern" shooters or these so-called "near future" shooters but I don't know if I want to return full-fledge to WW2 again. I'd like more imaginative universes... go back to the revolutionary war era but go crazy with it - give it a twist, make it fantastical, fake, no one's clamoring for a historically accurate sim.

I also think there's still a lot of room for future warfare to, future warfare that doesn't equal out to brown, dark, dingy, and post-apocalyptic (Gears of War / Killzone) and doesn't revolve around mechs. Give me some cool laser guns in a high-tech digital era, a human civil war set in the year 3000 or something. Not enough of those types of FPS games imo.
 
I don't have to wait that much longer. RO2 will be taking up a lot of my time very shortly.

But yeah, I'd be game for a really good SP WWII fps on CryEngine or Frostbite.
 
I'd like to see a game based on War and Peace and the Napoleonic Wars instead. Somehow have your opponent be called "Great" for leading to mass human suffering with no real goal in sight. Win a war by retreating. It will blow minds. Gunplay would be decent enough, some interesting scenarios and setpieces available already. Would probably be nice as a mostly adventure game with some FPS though modern publishers would want that switched.
 
Xav said:
World War II? Modern Setting? Future?
Just do them all.

307rmg7.png


That just made me cry a little inside. Future Perfect was such a great shooter.




But really, if you didn't go and play The Saboteur, Pandemic's last game, go and do yourself a favor and play it everybody. It was a really overlooked gem. WWII setting mixed with Assassin's Creed. It'll cost you no more than $20, and is totally worth it.
 
How bout we just take a break from military shooters for a while? Go back and revisit in a decade or something. Nobody will even notice they're gone!
 
I love the WW2 setting personally; I never tired of it as some did.

COD2 is still my favorite FPS campaign. There is a well defined enemy and sense of heroism and purpose to it all.

I still enjoy the modern games, but they don't have the same emotional attachment for me.
 
Never tired of wwII shooters to begin with (probably because so many of them were incredible -bf1942 , rtcw, moh:AA).
The guns in wwII shooters usually actually have recoil, they are not bullet hoses, and they sound and look really cool.

Same goes for planes and tanks from ww2, none of that auto lock on crap, but leading shells and bombs = fun!

Anyhow, red orchestra 2 is coming up soon, so if the netcode doesn't suck I'm set for my ww2 fix.
 
I liked the WWII time period, but the gameplay really wore thin on me. For me, if you're going to make a shooter with less-than-awesome weapons, presentation is everything. And too many games have screwed that up.
 
I absolutely want a new video game set during World War II.

I'd rather have a character based drama not focused on combat.

But if it is a Shooter based in combat, I would like it to be methodical, meditative, socially important, and large scale.

thin red line constructed in a game would be great, or atleast the grassy hill could be a great set.

No more dark and brown hues. I want to crawl through flowing fields, and I want to not shoot a bullet until I have to. I want to be scared of alerting the enemy. I want realism and respect of setting, not bro shooter kill nazis lol.

but yes, i would love for video games to explore World War II in their fiction more, including in combat oriented shooters.
 
I find myself thinking about this very topic from time to time, usually while playing a modern/near future FPS and comparing it to World at War.

These days, especially when looking at CoDs, its as simple as aim and shoot, or often, spray and pray. World at War was the first FPS I dedicated a lot of time to since Halo 2 (and even that I didn't spend much time with), and there, so much of it was played with the semi-automatic rifles (at least, my friends and I challenged ourselves to stick to the rifles instead of using the automatics, most of the time). As a result, the game felt much more deliberate and far less chaotic and random. Of course, I'm still talking about Call of Duty at the end of the day and not some niche, ultra realistic PC FPS, but the point still stands.

I wouldn't mind seeing a single game (or possibly series) return to WWII, but nothing more than that. And again, I'm really only thinking about MP, and the effects those older weapons have on the rhythm and flow of battle. I do have to agree that I think WWI would be really cool.

Obviously Time Splitters is the correct answer here though.
 
Htown said:
Well, the campaigns were a lot better in the World War 2 games, so I sure wouldn't mind.

Maybe I should think about Red Orchestra?
Multiplayer is going to be the main mode of play in RO2. I think there is some single player but I am not sure how campaigny it will be.
 
If taken back to WWII, make it different

I know it's taboo to be the "enemy", I mean you as a Nazi killing Allied soldiers = Blasphemy!
I wouldn't mind an alternate twist

Like lets say if Nazi's had won WWII, then go with the resistance/rebel/revolution method (almost like Homefront, but the Dominant party has been in power for 50+ years)

I wouldn't mind a zany version of WWII, (looks like THQ is getting that covered with the new Brother in Arms in the way of Inglorious Bastards)
 
Screw WWII. (Although I wouldn't be upset to see some Weird War 2 action)

Let's get some other wars in there. WWI, Russian Civil War, American Civil War, Napoleonic Wars, Mexican Revolution, War of 1812. (I really want to play as a Canadian in an FPS damn it, is there even a single WWII game where I can outside of multiplayer?)
 
I still want a game set in the Korean War. It would contain a lot of the qualities the OP is looking for but it would be treading new ground, unlike another WWII game. It has a good mix of arms and technology from WWII, plus new things like jet fighters that dogfight with guns, and American tanks that don't suck.
 
I would like to play a fps game set in WW2 set from the point of view of a regular joe, a survivor. You would spend the entire game escaping from firefights, crumbling cities, etc. The game would be more about being social, using your head than grabbing a gun and mowing down hundreds of nazis like you're a trained soldier. At best you would take part in sabotage missions organized by resistance members, or etc.
 
Anyone else look at the title and think it meant in a non-game context? I was all like "woo yeah, more blitzing, blackouts, rationing, basically everyone between 20 and 30 dead, good times."
 
I was done with "realistic" war shooters at around Call Of Duty 3. Doesn't even matter what historical or fictional real-world war is being portrayed. If there's any semblance of attempted authenticity, I automatically stop caring.
 
No. God how many war games did we see based in WWII? That was like all developers could think of for the better part of last gen and early this gen. I'm glad the genre has moved on.
 
One thing which WW2 games do better than modern games is create a sense of desperation and danger. Playing games in recent conflicts I feel like an indestructible combination of Rambo, James Bond and superman massacring a bunch of dudes from the 3rd world who have AKs and no body armour with the best weapons humanity has ever created. Seems a bit one-sided.

onken said:
Anyone else look at the title and think it meant in a non-game context? I was all like "woo yeah, more blitzing, blackouts, rationing, basically everyone between 20 and 30 dead, good times."

Separates the wheat from the chaff quick smart, let me tell you.
 
artwalknoon said:
No. God how many war games did we see based in WWII? That was like all developers could think of for the better part of last gen and early this gen. I'm glad the genre has moved on.

I blame saving private ryan for the ww2 shooter craze.
 
I'd like to see some games that use WWII indirectly, kind of like The Saboteur meant to. The generalized war shooter is just so played out for me.
 
I'd love one that heavily featured airplanes and dogfights and stuff above Europe and all that with modern visuals. I don't want the infantry trenches shit anymore though, that's done. Even the high level visuals we have now can't make that entertaining for me anymore.
 
I was thinking about what a new WW2 shooter might be like when I played the first level of Bad Company 2. I would like to have it if only for the ear and eye-candy. Frostbite sound engine is rad.
 
24FrameDaVinci said:
To be honest, I would love something very medieval, not in terms of Skyrim, but actual Game of Thrones-type "Choose your house" and just do all sorts of awesome things around the 7 Kingdoms. Deal?


It is a shame that every developer is afraid of more than 2 factions. Then they never attempt to keep any balance on either faction. So game is down the tubes with imbalance.
 
Like it's been said above, the first level of Bad Company 2 had me wanting a WWII game again, but Battlefield 1943 convinced me even more of that. Imagine a full game with maps from all fronts of the war, a single player campaign that can take you across all sorts of battles including infantry, tanks, aircraft, recon, etc. that gives you a great variety, and of course, the destruction from FB2 that could obliterate the jungle, bunkers, cities, airfields, etc.

I just want to see the return of ship battles in the BF series. It's been the thing I miss most from BF1942 and could you even imagine the awesomeness of naval battles on FB2 and even the destruction you could cause from shelling the beach in your destroyer? I CAN DREAM...

They have the technology now to make a true sequel to BF1942 that could blow people away and show us that WWII doesn't have to be stale still if there's enough innovation and awesomeness going on.
 
Day of Defeat is still, and will always will be the best WW2 game.
Metalmurphy said:
I feel like I already know it back and front from all different angles from all the WW2 games I played.

I'd be more into WW1 games. Not too familiar with that war.
Genre: Sit in trench until you die simulator
 
demolitio said:
Like it's been said above, the first level of Bad Company 2 had me wanting a WWII game again, but Battlefield 1943 convinced me even more of that. Imagine a full game with maps from all fronts of the war, a single player campaign that can take you across all sorts of battles including infantry, tanks, aircraft, recon, etc. that gives you a great variety, and of course, the destruction from FB2 that could obliterate the jungle, bunkers, cities, airfields, etc.

I just want to see the return of ship battles in the BF series. It's been the thing I miss most from BF1942 and could you even imagine the awesomeness of naval battles on FB2 and even the destruction you could cause from shelling the beach in your destroyer? I CAN DREAM...

They have the technology now to make a true sequel to BF1942 that could blow people away and show us that WWII doesn't have to be stale still if there's enough innovation and awesomeness going on.
I'd cum sooo hard for that game.

Land, Air, AND sea? Fuck yeah. A blazing angels/COD/Battlefied mix? OMFG!
 
BigNastyCurve said:
I don't think firing at the enemy in his trench while standing in your own trench sounds like much fun.
check out the necrovision games. ww1 had a lot more going for it than you think. vampires! demons! mech scorpions!
 
demolitio said:
Like it's been said above, the first level of Bad Company 2 had me wanting a WWII game again, but Battlefield 1943 convinced me even more of that. Imagine a full game with maps from all fronts of the war, a single player campaign that can take you across all sorts of battles including infantry, tanks, aircraft, recon, etc. that gives you a great variety, and of course, the destruction from FB2 that could obliterate the jungle, bunkers, cities, airfields, etc.

I just want to see the return of ship battles in the BF series. It's been the thing I miss most from BF1942 and could you even imagine the awesomeness of naval battles on FB2 and even the destruction you could cause from shelling the beach in your destroyer? I CAN DREAM...

They have the technology now to make a true sequel to BF1942 that could blow people away and show us that WWII doesn't have to be stale still if there's enough innovation and awesomeness going on.
http://www.heroesandgenerals.com/community/game/game-overview

it's not vapourware!

yet.
 
Top Bottom