Jason Frost
Member
Damn, I was trying earlier to understand what YA meant.
I thought it was the name of the production company, lol.
I thought it was the name of the production company, lol.
Gotham Academy is pretty decent. It's a similar idea. A school in Gotham with pupils as the main characters, how they discover mysteries in their school and how they perceive the known events and characters in Batman.It's a BBC3 show, so the target audience is likely to be 14-29. That's essentially what BBC calls young adult anyway.
Had a friend worried it'd be dumbed down like The Sarah Jane Adventures (although she never gave that much of a shot, that had some surprisingly good content in it, excluding Raxacoricofallapatorians). However, that was a CBBC show and clearly aimed at kids.
Seems people see the word "school" and assume it means it is for kids.
Personally, I'm sceptical, but will give it a shot.
Patrick Ness has been tweeting about the new spinoff. Some interesting things:
- Clara isn't in it
- Airs on BBC3 (online) first, then BBC 1, and as it airs on BBC1 the next episode is put online. So online will be one week ahead, it seems.
- It will apparently be darker than people are expecting, and he's saying people shouldn't get too obsessive over the YA-label. He says he's got some 'evil, evil' stories planned.
Accidently passed by the Tardis last week. Didn't meet the Doctor and also had no keys to open the Tardis.
Didn't know they had a blue police box in London
So considering he's promised "all-new" villains, what exactly is going to link this spin-off to Who? Unless we come across the heroes later in series 9, I suppose.Patrick Ness has been tweeting about the new spinoff. Some interesting things:
- Clara isn't in it
- Airs on BBC3 (online) first, then BBC 1, and as it airs on BBC1 the next episode is put online. So online will be one week ahead, it seems. Will air on BBC America as well.
- It will apparently be darker than people are expecting, and he's saying people shouldn't get too obsessive over the YA-label. He says he's got some 'evil, evil' stories planned.
So considering he's promised "all-new" villains, what exactly is going to link this spin-off to Who? Unless we come across the heroes later in series 9, I suppose.
So considering he's promised "all-new" villains, what exactly is going to link this spin-off to Who? Unless we come across the heroes later in series 9, I suppose.
Doctor Who is aimed at a wide (family) demographic, Sarah Jane Adventures, Torchwood and Class are all aimed at subsets that existing demographic.Doctor Who is a kiddie show. Class is aimed at an older audience than Doctor Who.
So considering he's promised "all-new" villains, what exactly is going to link this spin-off to Who? Unless we come across the heroes later in series 9, I suppose.
And I'm sure Sarah Jane style they'll bring out at least one classic baddie. I'd kinda love to see something like the Ood or the Silence in an urban setting.
Or they could Torchwood style do a reimagining of a classic enemy
Please no
Cyberteenager!
I didn't watch Torchwood, what classic enemy did they muck with?
So considering he's promised "all-new" villains, what exactly is going to link this spin-off to Who? Unless we come across the heroes later in series 9, I suppose.
Wut.
Wasn't there supposed to be plans for a BBC themepark, with Sherlock and DW and shit?
It was an amazingly bad show at times.
It didn't take long at all: the second episode had a sex cloud from Mars that took over people's bodies so it could fuck people because it lived of the energy released from orgasms (and the other person would disintegrate at the point of orgasm). I did not make any of this up.
I mean, people often say that Sarah Jane was the kids show and Torchwood was the adult show, but it was only adult in the sense that they talked about sex and death all the time. It was incredibly juvinile, moreso than Sarah Jane I think. If that's what people think an adult version of Doctor Who should be, I'm very happy the new series is getting a YA-label.
(of course there are good parts too - Children of Earth was a very nice surprise at the time).
It'll most likely have one or two DW villains. If I'm betting based on nothing, I'd say we'd get a Weeping Angels episode. They'd probably link whatever happens to Clara to it, too.
Also, 12th Doctor cameo.
I've never read anything he's written and I've never watched Buffy, but I guess that should give some people here some indication of what to expect. I'm not completely against this - we don't know anything yet after all. I don't get the criticism that the BBC was building hype for nothing, because all they did was put out a bunch of tweets a couple of hours before the press embargo broke. All the hyping was done by fan communities really. They're allowed to promote something like this, and a new spin-off show is pretty big news, even if most people here might not be in the target audience.
Does anyone know how old the kids in the show are supposed to be? That kid who played Rigsy(?) was pretty good.
I'm on season 4.
I want to like Donna I really do...
What are you doing man? Like, from your posts in the thread I'm pretty sure your tastes corroborate a lot with my own and so I can pretty much guarantee you'd love Buffy. I think Whedon and Moffat share very similar senses of humour (or at least undercutting moments of tension with jokes) and a talent for writing really troubled characters. It's what...nearly 20 years old at this point and gets campy as anything at times but seriously, do yourself a favour and just plow through it. Particularly if Class does turn out to be Buffy-esque. It's kind of the pinnacle of sci-fi/fantasy drama aimed at a young audience before YA was particularly a thing.
They briefly mentioned A-levels which would place them from 16 up to 18 which is typical YA character ages. If I had to guess I'd say they'll go for fairly young actors in their 20s who can pass for late teens because that at least guarantees some degree of acting credibility. Which I imagine is where all the trepidation about the announcement came from. One mention of being set in a school and everyone thinks it'll be 8 year olds running around. Think of something like Misfits or Skins. If nothing else having older teens means you can have romance storylines without it feeling icky.
I'm on season 4.
I want to like Donna I really do...
I liked Countrycide....and...that's about it.
The memories...thanks for that, infiniteloop.
I stuck to Torchwood until Countrycide in Series 1. It was a struggle to get into it, and that episode and the preview for Greeks Bearing Fruit didn't make it appealing enough for me to continue on.
What I hated the most about Torchwood was probably its attempt at being "for adults only". It felt forced. Edgy for the sake of it.
And I wasn't very fond of the cast after the 6 episodes.
I wouldn't mind if they carried over the Trickster from Sarah Jane as an antagonist.
Doctor Who is a kiddie show. Class is aimed at an older audience than Doctor Who.
More wanky fan service than Moffat has ever gone for, in my opinionEnd of season 4.
Uuuugh are you serious? Uuuugh. Rose and Second Doctor
Uuuugh, what is this??
It was an amazingly bad show at times.
It didn't take long at all: the second episode had a sex cloud from Mars that took over people's bodies so it could fuck people because it lived of the energy released from orgasms (and the other person would disintegrate at the point of orgasm). I did not make any of this up.
I mean, people often say that Sarah Jane was the kids show and Torchwood was the adult show, but it was only adult in the sense that they talked about sex and death all the time. It was incredibly juvinile, moreso than Sarah Jane I think. If that's what people think an adult version of Doctor Who should be, I'm very happy the new series is getting a YA-label.
(of course there are good parts too - Children of Earth was a very nice surprise at the time).
More wanky fan service than Moffat has ever gone for, in my opinion
RTD wrote a lot of really great cliffhangers but he usually had some really shitty resolutions to those cliffhangers.