SictorVullivan
Member
Another reference to an hybrid eh?
I don't even know what you want then man. That was solid on all accounts...Huh.
Ok.
5/10. I have no opinion.
Really feel like they're setting her up to be a companion after Clara, the only thing stopping me thinking that is she's still got Game of Thrones...
Well that was obvious she (masie) was going to be his new assistant, and even if they dont use her in the future now shes hybrid, she can probably change her appearance a la romana for another actress to fill in
They could set her up now and use her later I.e. DonnaReally feel like they're setting her up to be a companion after Clara, the only thing stopping me thinking that is she's still got Game of Thrones...
I don't even know what you want then man. That was solid on all accounts...
They could set her up now and use her later I.e. Donna
They could set her up now and use her later I.e. Donna
Um... WTF. RTD has no business teaching anyone anything.So uh they're really going for this hybrid thing aren't they
Can someone get RTD to teach Moffat plot arcs. Please.
So uh they're really going for this hybrid thing aren't they
Nicely put. Say what you will about him, and I agree he's overrated, but damn I'll take Mr. Saxon and Bad Wolf over "This impossible girl is IMPOSSIBLE" any day.Um... WTF. RTD has no business teaching anyone anything.
I'd rather the "faces" plotline be a nice little reference like that than a massive subplot Moffat founded on pure coincidence though.
Well in it's nature it's just them working with what they were given, but I liked it. Better than the "who blew up the Tardis" explanation in any case.Absolutely agreed, I just thought it was a bit strange. I can't imagine a direction where that plot could have been taken without it being a ridiculous pile of nonsense. With Moffat referencing the idea in Deep Breath I imagined it would become a series wide arc at some point, but I guess he added it in there just in case he had any ideas later on.
Well in it's nature it's just them working with what they were given, but I liked it. Better than the "who blew up the Tardis" explanation in any case.
3 for 3 for Mathieson, there.
Yeah, it was a romp, but it's been a while since we've had a good romp! What set this apart from something like Robot of Sherwood or Dinosaurs on a Spaceship, though, were the tones it juggled- even setting aside the last five minutes, we had funny comedy side-by-side with really quite poignant and lyrical material, and that last five or ten minutes was really great- the very last shot is one of the finest that Who has ever offered up, and I'm really interested to see where it goes next week.
The alien plot was thinly sketched, but still fun. It will, however, always be damaged by the fact that Brian Blessed had to pull out of playing Odin at the eleventh hour.
Yeah exactly, it would have been a romp if not for the part where we got some genuinely excellent Clara/Doctor development.
And WHAT. Didn't he play someone on Who before?
I loved that. Probably the first episode I'm dying to rewatch since Flatline (what a coincidence).
Yes it's campy and rompy and every other throwaway pejorative you can come up with, but brimming under the surface is this whole idea of the Doctor affecting time to varying degrees, and how stories aren't these nice little self contained things. I love that he points out having the Vikings win and beat the Mire could just potentially put the whole planet in jeopardy. And then of course you have him doing the noble thing and save Ashildr only for that to have the biggest ripple in time possible.
That final shot was beautiful, and kind of managed to sum up the concept of immortality in one go. Generally, I thought this episode just visually looked fantastic. CG dragon aside (which I guess you can write off as being intentionally poor looking) everything from the Mire to the spaceship to the mountains in the distance to pretty much every one of those shots of the Doctor and Clara talking was beautiful.
I actually think this would be a perfect episode to introduce someone to the show. It kinda has everything and handles it superbly.
Time Lords are shits?I wonder what Colin Baker's face was supposed to be a message about?
Man, some Doctor Who fans are absolutely allergic to anything that anyone can even conceivably consider silly. I haven't seen a Gallifrey Base rate-the-episode thread quite so out of step with what most others are saying for quite a long time.
Yeah, the poll scores are always more positive than the written reviews, but it's particularly bad this week. If you read their opinions, you'd think this episode was a laughable disaster.Seems pretty solid scores over there. A lot of 7-9s for the episode. I think it's a 7/10 for me personally, quite an enjoyable ep.
Yeah, the poll scores are always more positive than the written reviews, but it's particularly bad this week. If you read their opinions, you'd think this episode was a laughable disaster.
I don't have any problems with negative reviews at all- I disagree with this guy's conclusions, and think his tone is hyperbolic, but it is what it is.I enjoyed it but your probably going to hate this review which is titled Maisie Williams should of stuck to game of thrones.
Written some by british reviewer whose last article was about doctor who being canceled.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/neilmid...illiams-should-have-stuck-to-game-of-thrones/
I wonder what Colin Baker's face was supposed to be a message about?
I quite enjoyed that. Are we playing around with Time Lord Triumphant again?