Aside from having much better production values and less serialized plots, it's not all that different. Still a guy in a suit frolicking around an England with a disproportionate number of alien encounters/explosions. He just happens to a guy in his late 20's now and not your grandpa.
Looks beige to me.
I was reading the DW Tumblr, and someone reblogged a post with this message attached:
Does anyone else feel this way?
That's not a very high standard.I'm hoping for a return to S5 overall arc quality
That's not a very high standard.
I'm hoping for a return to S5 overall arc quality
I'm hoping for a return to S5 overall arc quality
What Doctor Who arc was better than s5 then?
What Doctor Who arc was better than s5 then?
I'd argue Series 4. Had a deeper understanding of what an arc is than the repeated words that RTD used elsewhere, was integrated subtly and satisfyingly (missing planets, Rose in The Poison Sky) and had an exciting payoff. Moffat's arcs interfere with the individual episodes too much for me (see Flesh and Stone as a prime example).
The Keeper of Traken > Logopolis > CastrovalvaWhat Doctor Who arc was better than s5 then?
Moffat was cooler when he wasn't a showrunner.Thinks lowly of S5, doesn't pay attention to broadcast dates... you're not too hot at this "being a DW fan" lark, are you?![]()
the true answer is that Doctor Who is a show that doesn't benefit that much from having season long arcs and instead shines during stand alone stories
ScreenSplitter said:Don't forget the bees. That was a nice touch. I think my main problem with Moffat's arcs stems with the fact that the conclusions are very rarely satisfying.
Don't forget the bees. That was a nice touch. I think my main problem with Moffat's arcs stems with the fact that the conclusions are very rarely satisfying.
Does anyone else find it extremely weird thatThe Doctor deprived them of raising their child (her growing up alongside you is not a substitute), and that's apparently all fine? By all rights Amy should hate his Time Lord guts.
I'm hoping for a return to S5 overall arc quality
Well, they didn't even know she was pregnant, and they have the knowledge that she definitely survives (or... something... timey wimey...), so... it's a bit of a null state
I would be extremely unsurprised if this were addressed in the next 5 episodes.
Does anyone else find it extremely weird that The Doctor deprived them of raising their child
Let's Kill Hitler: "You got to raise me after all."
Let's Kill Hitler: "You got to raise me after all."
How many more days do I have to wait for this
Ask any mother whether she would rather have raised her child as an adult, where she could appreciate the maternal bond and nuances of childhood from an adult perspective, or have them grow up beside them when their understanding was restricted to that of a child. They may have spent a considerable amount of time together, but Amy/Rory had no idea of the significance of Mel, and their relationship will never be a normal mother/daughter one. They will definitely take issue with The Doctor over this.
I'd argue Series 4. Had a deeper understanding of what an arc is than the repeated words that RTD used elsewhere, was integrated subtly and satisfyingly (missing planets, Rose in The Poison Sky) and had an exciting payoff. Moffat's arcs interfere with the individual episodes too much for me (see Flesh and Stone as a prime example).
.It would be nice for Moffatt to acknowledge a time where he didn't run the show outside a few hologram cameos
What really bugged me was the Doctor circumventing the whole "fixed point in time" thing with a robot suit. Apparently time doesn't mind if you're a robot. Also, way too much to squeeze into one episode. Could have easily got rid of some fluff episodes to make it a two parter.
What really bugged me about s6 was that the entire 'spectacle' (of time piling up on itself in the last episode) was not actually a part of the plot per se but rather River fucking up 11's already working plot to work the fixed point in time to his advantage.
What really bugged me was the Doctor circumventing the whole "fixed point in time" thing with a robot suit. Apparently time doesn't mind if you're a robot. Also, way too much to squeeze into one episode. Could have easily got rid of some fluff episodes to make it a two parter.
Also the fact that River not killing him messed up the fixed point in time, even though if she was always not going to kill him then that should've been what got set as the fixed point. Or something like that.
What really bugged me was the Doctor circumventing the whole "fixed point in time" thing with a robot suit. Apparently time doesn't mind if you're a robot. Also, way too much to squeeze into one episode. Could have easily got rid of some fluff episodes to make it a two parter.
Also the fact that River not killing him messed up the fixed point in time, even though if she was always not going to kill him then that should've been what got set as the fixed point. Or something like that.
What really bugged me was the Doctor circumventing the whole "fixed point in time" thing with a robot suit. Apparently time doesn't mind if you're a robot. Also, way too much to squeeze into one episode. Could have easily got rid of some fluff episodes to make it a two parter.