Don't want to trash your new thread, but because you're comparing beta and release day perfromance. Wasn't the beta set on the lowest settings and the newest benchmarks are on ultra?
Damn, matchmaking on PS4 is taking forever. It's friday evening so I doubt it's due to a lack of players?
Are you trying Soul Harvest? That's what most people play.
I'm playing on PS4 . I put it on Strafe controls (Bumper Jumper) and jump around all over the place, using Glory Kills whenever I can.
can you change the difficulty at any time? I'm not home yet to try it out
What control options are there?
Chomag7
May 13, 2016
There is word that describes the game perfectly: DULL.
This game is practically Doom 1993 with a 2016 graphic facelift. It has no cut scenes, dialogues are all about 3 people talking to you via radio, no npc interaction other than shooting monsters, no vehicle action, no nothing. This game is dull as ****
I can't help but compare it to Wolfenstein: New Order. People, Doom 2016 HAS NOTHING over W:NO. The latter is simply a masterpiece with tons of cut scenes, tons of story, tons of dialogues and npc interactions. Doom is about shooting monsters through narrow corridors, that's it. Doom 2016 is not even scary like Doom 3. Doom 2016 is just an average run of the mill shooter that could have been made just as well by Nobody Studios and not ID.
Also it's very short, about 10 hours.
Multiplayer? Oh god, it's Quake. If you like to play such a basic and simple shooter like Quake in the year 2016 when we have CoD, Counterstrike and Overwatch, by all means, do play it, but the majority of players will just see it the same as they see the singleplayer: dull and unimpressive.
Save your money. This game is not worth it. I have no idea what did they do with the budget, this game feels like it was made with a really small budget for an AAA game.
Does this run well on consoles? With no reviews out yet, but hearing some good stuff here on GAF, I want to make sure that there aren't any technical issues on PS4 before I jump in.
Metacritic user reviews at their finest.
Doom 2016 HAS NOTHING over W:NO. The latter is simply a masterpiece with tons of cut scenes, tons of story, tons of dialogues and npc interactions.
sigh...Metacritic user reviews at their finest.
Honestly, when I first saw the Assault Rifle I was like, eh... I guess I'll use it but whatever. After I used it though, I was like "this friggen thing is awesome!"Question for you folks: Is this the greatest Assault Rifle ever?
Going by the sound of it this guy has to be kidding, if he is not then god save us all.Metacritic user reviews at their finest.
Metacritic user reviews at their finest.
When's the review embargo?
Any way to get the chainsaw back? I didn't hold onto it at the end of the mission like every other weapon for whatever reason.
Any way to get the chainsaw back? I didn't hold onto it at the end of the mission like every other weapon for whatever reason.
Holy hell this game moves fast on console. I thought people were saying it was slow. Make TNO look like it's a casual stroll in the park rofl
I had this thought a while ago, and it's giving me a lot of faith in Bethesda as a publisher. I look forward to the inevitable Prey reboot.Has anyone else noticed that, Bethesda published games always seem to go the same way?
1.Game is announced and people are cautiously interested.
2.Theres a poor showing of the game via a demo that makes people worried.
3.Time goes on with people worrying that the game might not be so good.
4.Game comes out and it's awesome.
I feel like this happened with Dishonored, Wolfenstein, and now Doom.
Nobody ever said it was slow.
Has anyone else noticed that, Bethesda published games always seem to go the same way?
1.Game is announced and people are cautiously interested.
2.Theres a poor showing of the game via a demo that makes people worried.
3.Time goes on with people worrying that the game might not be so good.
4.Game comes out and it's awesome.
I feel like this happened with Dishonored, Wolfenstein, and now Doom.
Does this run well on consoles? With no reviews out yet, but hearing some good stuff here on GAF, I want to make sure that there aren't any technical issues on PS4 before I jump in.
How are the graphics for you guys? I am running at ultra and it looks really really poor. It looks on par with games like Quake 4 or Doom 3 (both very good looking games but pretty old all things considered). There is barely any blood and corpses disappear just *poof* and gone, at least in Doom 3 they kind of burned up a bit.
Gameplay is great, performance is great but the graphics are a real bummer so far.
Has anyone else noticed that, Bethesda published games always seem to go the same way?
1.Game is announced and people are cautiously interested.
2.Theres a poor showing of the game via a demo that makes people worried.
3.Time goes on with people worrying that the game might not be so good.
4.Game comes out and it's awesome.
I feel like this happened with Dishonored, Wolfenstein, and now Doom.