Edit:
----
It's a 1-month old interview with Takamasa Shiba (producer from Square-Enix) in which he states:
Original source: http://www.famitsu.com/news/201304/04031332.html&usg=ALkJrhhz6-RKpZsCqHreUmlwi8EWbUtyOA (if anyone thinks there's a mistranslation or something).
EDIT: Sorry to duckroll for bumping the old thread. I thought topic relevancy took precedence over thread creation.
There's something that should be noted about the story that AnimeNewsNetwork put up. What they quoted Shiba on is not entirely accurate. He is speaking about how Square Enix has not been making sequels to core franchises like those mentioned, and that it cannot continue this way, because they're neglecting the core market. The implication of course is that Drag-on Dragoon 3 is a sequel to such a core franchise, and they're hoping to satisfy fans who have been waiting for such a sequel.
This doesn't really change much of the "LOL FUCK SQUARE ENIX" stuff, clearly, but he isn't saying that there aren't any plans to make sequels to the franchises mentioned, simply that they haven't done so of late (which is already obvious to everyone).
----
It's a 1-month old interview with Takamasa Shiba (producer from Square-Enix) in which he states:
In an interview with the game news source Famitsu, Taro Yokō and Takamasa Shiba — creative director and producer for Square Enix's Drakengard 3 action role-playing game — revealed that the company is not currently making new installments to their Star Ocean, Valkyrie Profile, or Romancing Saga video game series.
“We didn't think that was good,” said Shiba, “We made the opinion that if there's a good game already there, why should we leave it alone? After all, the Drakengard series is also a game series for hardcore fans.”
The producer also noted that in recent times, it is easy to see what sells and what does not, and games for casual gamers are beginning to decline. He explains that this was what made him decide to make a sequel to Drakengard after eight years.
Original source: http://www.famitsu.com/news/201304/04031332.html&usg=ALkJrhhz6-RKpZsCqHreUmlwi8EWbUtyOA (if anyone thinks there's a mistranslation or something).
EDIT: Sorry to duckroll for bumping the old thread. I thought topic relevancy took precedence over thread creation.