Jacksonlee
Member
This is an amazing article.
holy crap it is.
i will be reading it after i finish the game!
This is an amazing article.
Is that the in-game explanation? Does Sorceress have a canonical reason for wearing impractical clothing while going on a physically active adventure? Honest question
That's balancing out the status quo.The phenomenon which sees otherwise rational gaming enthusiasts demanding asexual depictions of women in games as an alternative to more sexualized depictions, totally oblivious to the notion that what they demand is every bit as sexist as the alternative.
Don't you think Dragon's Crown is a fictional setting based a lot on middle-age thinking?
Wow @ Co-Optimus review of the MP. Really not sure I need or want to play this online after that breakdown.
There’s no way to directly invite friends to games, either, and there’s also no way to trade items.
it doesn't exist. Men aren't sexualized in the same way as women.Then what is?
And yes you can also add men's chests to that list!
Exactly what I was saying earlier, why is she wearing that clothing? What is it in service of?
Why are videogames limited to "story" or "gameplay"? What about overall aesthetics? Visuals. Atmosphere. What are the breasts on a woman in a nude painting in service of?
Vita. I don't spend much time on my PS3 and I really want to play this...
It is unfortunate how these threads are rarely about mechanics, or even overall atmosphere. I did ask some questions about how the game plays in the OT, but they've gone unanswered. So, I give up.
i agree with the polygon score. no interest in this game
Then I would question the developer for ulterior motives on what their intention was when creating the character.
It is. But when people do things instinctively without thinking or being made aware of how others perceive what they do, that's what happens.
Fortunately, most people do a better job of thinking about things if people raise the issue. Some get offended that the issue was raised in the first place, but those people are always there.
well, given how most of the characters are abnormal in all of Dragon's Crown's realm, i would say any other characters in any other video games are considered normal and close to realistic emulations of human beings. - isn't that why there is controversy in DC's designs? this excludes monsters, aliens, and other life forms.
Is that the in-game explanation? Does Sorceress have a canonical reason for wearing impractical clothing while going on a physically active adventure? Honest question
By overall aesthetics and visuals you mean it's in service of using the visuals to appeal to a certain type of person right?
EDIT: And secondly are you seriously trying to compare high art classical paintings to Dragon Crown use of female proportions?
The fact that a whopping total of 3 women are shown being able to fight doesn't mean it is a society based on equality. I think the world showing women only as peasant farmers or royalty is a bigger sign of what the game is set in.I haven't played it, but it doesn't seem like it is. From what I've seen of it it looks like a world similar to a default Dungeons and Dragons kind of world where men and women have equal opportunity for adventure and derring-do. But then all the women (except for the female main characters) end up tied up or with demon dog heads pulling their legs apart suggestively.
I really like the idea of playing this on Vita, but once I'm done I can't think of anything else I'd play on Vita...
Is that the in-game explanation? Does Sorceress have a canonical reason for wearing impractical clothing while going on a physically active adventure? Honest question
By overall aesthetics and visuals you mean it's in service of using the visuals to appeal to a certain type of person right?
EDIT: And secondly are you seriously trying to compare high art classical paintings to Dragon Crown use of female proportions?
Exactly what I was saying earlier, why is she wearing that clothing? What is it in service of?
Is it part of her character to cleverly and smartly seduce otherwise foolish men, using her charms?
If so then fine, but it seems like there is no real purpose other than fan service.
By overall aesthetics and visuals you mean it's in service of using the visuals to appeal to a certain type of person right?
EDIT: And secondly are you seriously trying to compare high art classical paintings to Dragon Crown use of female proportions?
Don't know if it's been addressed yet but why should games be held to a different regard than film? There's all sorts of films of any subject matter and characterization being made.
This is just ridiculous. Does Miranda have a reason for wearing a skin tight suit when she is going to face guns on the battlefield?
Yeah, I would have preferred not to purchase the game twice, but for Dragon's Crown, I will. It helps that I'm getting the Vita version for a cheaper price thanks to Futureshop's past E3 promotion. >Sad there's no crossplay. Seems the perfect game for it.
What's the high and low on how long this game takes to complete?
Well, there's an in-game explanation for that. She's was biologically engineered to be an aesthetically perfect woman by her father.
But for the record I also considered her outfit to be dumb as hell.
The fact that a whopping total of 3 women are shown being able to fight doesn't mean it is a society based on equality. I think the world showing women only as peasant farmers or royalty is a bigger sign of what the game is set in.
Fair enough. That was my point anyway.
Don't know if it's been addressed yet but why should games be held to a different regard than film? There's all sorts of films of any subject matter and characterization being made.
![]()
Note her torso and arm proportions, where her breast is relative to where her rib cage should be, the suggestive look on her face, and the general aesthetics that conform to what was "attractive" during its time.
Dragon's Crown is hardly the first piece of art to exaggerate a human form for the sake of expression.
How does that have anything to do with what she wears? All that pertains to is her physical qualities, not her clothes...
What do you mean what's the point? They wanted to make a game with an artstyle that would grab peoples attention. Kamitani said going strictly traditional would've meant that the game would just get lost in the mix. So he decided to exaggerate everything to make it stand out more. But I think this article does a good job of explaining everything
http://art-eater.com/2013/03/from-m...ragons-crown-trailer-is-full-of-epic-homages/
Some great comparison of where the art comes from. Everything from classic Disney to Frank Frazetta.
Why can he not? Doesn't change anything, people cannot draw inspiration from that anymore?
What do you mean what's the point? They wanted to make a game with an artstyle that would grab peoples attention. Kamitani said going strictly traditional would've meant that the game would just get lost in the mix. So he decided to exaggerate everything to make it stand out more. But I think this article does a good job of explaining everything
http://art-eater.com/2013/03/from-m...ragons-crown-trailer-is-full-of-epic-homages/
Some great comparison of where the art comes from. Everything from classic Disney to Frank Frazetta.
This article details how much thought went into the art of the game. I was on the fence until I read this article, now I feel I owe it to myself to support a company that put so much thought into the style and setting in what I originally thought was just a beat-em-up. What a treat!
I just don't understand why you would put someone like her on the review other than to stir up controversy. Her first line in the video review is "Dragon's Crown is a teenage boys dream."
If you can't tell the difference between this:
Dragon Crown
and this:
"Venus Asleep" - Giorgione
I don't know what to tell you.
One treats the female with an ounce of respect and the other doesn't
Anyway, if that appeals to you - that's fine. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, the Polygon reviewer disagreed with the design choices, that's fine too.
I need to step out now for dinner, so if I don't respond it's not because I hate you.
Completely agree with this. There are so many films that have tons of sex and nudity in it that aren't "necessary". Is Monster's Ball really better off having an explicit sex scene where you can literally see Billy Bob Thorton's testicles touching Halle Barry's ass? Clearly the director put it in there just go build controversy and get pervs to watch the movie.They just want to slip in a mini porno movie in to get cheap ticket sales. I'm disappointed more reviewers did not make at least 50% of the review about this scene and how sexist it was.