Bet this thread is longer than the OT. Especially if we include the other topics about exactly the same thing.
Hopefully not. Game looks and sounds great and I think lots of people on here are excited to play it.
Bet this thread is longer than the OT. Especially if we include the other topics about exactly the same thing.
No they aren't, they are simply secondary sexual characteristics. Large breasts are just a physiological response to large amounts of oestrogen in the system, in much the same way that muscle and body hair growth responds to Testosterone.
Both these hormones are present in both sexes, just at different levels.
Nope. Breasts are sexualized, just like the tongue, and the feet, and in some cases, eyeballs.
No not at all, I wouldn't have problem with it as long as it didn't make a point to show her in seductive poses and have her breasts jiggle every two seconds.
If she was simply a person with large breasts, so be it.
This sort of classic fantasy with some Japanese flavor is all they were going for. I just don't see why it should be protested, when works like this are not. As many violent games as I play, I am far more offended by something like civilians getting killed rather than some big, cartoony boobs, but that's just me.
For every Nathan Drake and Joel there is an Alyx Vance and Elena Fisher. What is your point?
It is weird that this what is expected of female videogame characters now, apparently across every type of game and universe.
Eh the wiggly dick does help, believe it or not.
That being said, I just don't see enough of said men as examples to leverage as a counterpoint to the MASSIVE amount of female oversexualization in certain games.
So, um...these reviews make me pretty excited for the game. Anybody else here getting hyped?
What do you consider real/normal in this case?
I find it laughable that people in this forum are pointing to bare chested muscled men as some sort of equivalent to the objectification of the women being displayed because all that is doing is reinforcing the power fantasy the game provides. (Depicting the male as powerful and the women as voluptuous).
I wouldn't have a problem with the huge jiggly tits if they were in service of something.
Be it the story or gameplay.
On second thought however, it is in service of something. It's in service of fulfilling young male adolescents power fantasy.
Are the women in the game not also powerful? The Amazon supposedly has the highest DPI in the game.
Bet this thread is longer than the OT. Especially if we include the other topics about exactly the same thing.
You should design the everyday loincloth for men to wear in everyday life then. If it's true that a wiggly dick is hugely attractive to women, that's a huge portion of the market not being served right now. According to you it helps, then it should quickly become just as popular as the low cut dress for women and make you a bazillionaire.
Why are videogames limited to "story" or "gameplay"? What about overall aesthetics? Visuals. Atmosphere. What are the breasts on a woman in a nude painting in service of?
It just so happens The Last of Us is a power fantasy enjoyed by young males everywhere. I'm not even going to bother to ask what Vire qualifies as "adolescent".
Now back to the point you completely missed (again): What evidence do you have that you know the mindset of the people responsible for this game? I.e. that you knew they created things the way they did to pander?
Leaving aside the question of who they thought that kind of character archetype would appeal to, I'm sure they did, not really aiming for that right now.If from the start they decided "We want the Sorceress to exhibit a seductive look that is somewhat exaggerated."
My point is, because they're male, the (only/first/best/preferred)way they think of nailing that look is GIANT FAKE TITS.they may give her large breasts with the purpose of nailing that look. You're being very closed-minded here.
So, um...these reviews make me pretty excited for the game. Anybody else here getting hyped?
apparently the women in this game are only powerful because men want them to be powerful. or something like that.
I can see women being more offended by this if anything.Most of the posters in here are missing the point entirely. The male equivalent is not a fit guy with muscles, it would be if he had a huge wiggly dick jiggling all over the place in his thong as he walked.
Love to see the Twittersphere's "no big deal, get over it" reaction to that one.
You completely edited, cut and pasted my post to fit your arguement. But whatever floats your boat. I made my point abundantly clear in the full post.
If that isn't good enough for you, I'm not sure what else to say. But that's my opinion.
That's incredibly insulting to men.Leaving aside the question of who they thought that kind of character archetype would appeal to, I'm sure they did, not really aiming for that right now.
My point is, because they're male, the (only/first/best/preferred)way they think of nailing that look is GIANT FAKE TITS.
I never said a wiggly dick is HUGELY attractive to women. You just did. I was poking fun at your comment because in some situations (not that I'd expect you to agree) a big dick can help
But no, seeing men in nothing but a loincloth is by no means a standard. Though some loincloths cover more skin than many thongs today!
So, um...these reviews make me pretty excited for the game. Anybody else here getting hyped?
Call it the Chell Effect:
![]()
The phenomenon which sees otherwise rational gaming enthusiasts demanding asexual depictions of women in games as an alternative to more sexualized depictions, totally oblivious to the notion that what they demand is every bit as sexist as the alternative.
The first step to throwing off the shackles of sexism in the gaming community is to stop focusing so much on appearance and focus more on character. It's my belief that a female character could run around totally nude and flaunt her sexuality flagrantly and still be an interesting character with depth so long as she's written that way. Her appearance isn't what's holding her back - it's the mindset of the men (probably) writing her.
Now, can appearance lend itself to having that negative mindset? Absolutely. Seeing sexualized caricatures of women can hammer home the belief that women are meant to be sexual objects. But the depiction is not the source. That rests in family, community, culture, what have you - videogames are the last place people should expect to receive accurate depictions of women (or anyone, for that matter) from, but it is what it is.
I think we can all agree that women need and deserve more varied representation in gaming - they shouldn't all be sexual objects or chaste, asexual Nice Guy fantasies of what they presume an empowered woman should look like.
The fictional reality story isn't beholden to it either, but I assume you would be okay with it. What if I made a movie set in a world where women were not treated fairly. Maybe it's a part of the plot. Maybe it's just the backdrop of the actual plot of the movie. That is the universe I am depicting. It's the setting I chose my movie to be set in. People would find that acceptable for the most part. They would watch that movie and say "Okay, In IHaveCandyLand women don't have the same freedom men do. That's just how that world is. So be it." and go on with watching the rest of the movie. If I turn that movie into a game though, oh no, this is terrible. Why aren't they treated as equals? Clearly this is sexism at play.
That is what is absurd. And the fact that a total of 3 women are shown to be able to fight doesn't somehow mean you can't make a world where women rights resemble an earlier time of our history.
What if she liked to wait somewhat revealing clothing? What if she was very confident in her body and didnt mind letting them sway a bit?No not at all, I wouldn't have problem with it as long as it didn't make a point to show her in seductive poses, scantily clothed and have her breasts jiggle every two seconds.
If she was simply a person with large breasts, so be it.
Most of the posters in here are missing the point entirely. The male equivalent is not a fit guy with muscles, it would be if he had a huge wiggly dick jiggling all over the place in his thong as he walked.
What do you mean what's the point? They wanted to make a game with an artstyle that would grab peoples attention. Kamitani said going strictly traditional would've meant that the game would just get lost in the mix. So he decided to exaggerate everything to make it stand out more. But I think this article does a good job of explaining everything
http://art-eater.com/2013/03/from-m...ragons-crown-trailer-is-full-of-epic-homages/
Some great comparison of where the art comes from. Everything from classic Disney to Frank Frazetta.
Look my point is the male equivalent of accentuating breasts is not at all a huge flopping dick. Women themselves often accentuate the breast and butt, whereas men will put the focus on their abs and arms to attract the other sex visually.
Co Optimus review seems to be mostly positive for local co-op so this is looking like a buy for me. My girlfriend was looking forward to this game and I was hoping the local co-op wouldn't be broken or a "second class" mode in the game.
Need more games like this that emphasize local co-op!
Don't you think Dragon's Crown is a fictional setting based a lot on middle-age thinking?A fictional story set in a historical time period has a specific reason to make females act a certain way and have certain roles in the story. They want to appear realistic to the time period they are setting it in. And even in those kind of films you'll often see them add some amount of female characters taking active roles in the story.
And fantasy stories often do see criticism for having worlds where females have no agency. "This story has no women" is a fairly common complaint leveled at Lord of the Rings, for example.
The first step to throwing off the shackles of sexism in the gaming community is to stop focusing so much on appearance and focus more on character. It's my belief that a female character could run around totally nude and flaunt her sexuality flagrantly and still be an interesting character with depth so long as she's written that way. Her appearance isn't what's holding her back - it's the mindset of the men (probably) writing her.
Co Optimus review seems to be mostly positive for local co-op so this is looking like a buy for me. My girlfriend was looking forward to this game and I was hoping the local co-op wouldn't be broken or a "second class" mode in the game.
Need more games like this that emphasize local co-op!
Call it the Chell Effect:
![]()
The phenomenon which sees otherwise rational gaming enthusiasts demanding asexual depictions of women in games as an alternative to more sexualized depictions, totally oblivious to the notion that what they demand is every bit as sexist as the alternative.
The first step to throwing off the shackles of sexism in the gaming community is to stop focusing so much on appearance and focus more on character. It's my belief that a female character could run around totally nude and flaunt her sexuality flagrantly and still be an interesting character with depth so long as she's written that way. Her appearance isn't what's holding her back - it's the mindset of the men (probably) writing her.
Now, can appearance lend itself to having that negative mindset? Absolutely. Seeing sexualized caricatures of women can hammer home the belief that women are meant to be sexual objects. But the depiction is not the source. That rests in family, community, culture, what have you - videogames are the last place people should expect to receive accurate depictions of women (or anyone, for that matter) from, but it is what it is.
I think we can all agree that women need and deserve more varied representation in gaming - they shouldn't all be sexual objects or chaste, asexual Nice Guy fantasies of what they presume an empowered woman should look like.
What if she liked to wait somewhat revealing clothing? What if she was very confident in her body and didnt mind letting them sway a bit?
What if she liked to wait somewhat revealing clothing? What if she was very confident in her body and didnt mind letting them sway a bit?
The phenomenon which sees otherwise rational gaming enthusiasts demanding asexual depictions of women in games as an alternative to more sexualized depictions, totally oblivious to the notion that what they demand is every bit as sexist as the alternative.
That's incredibly insulting to men.
I can think of four games where that's possible: Saints Row, Saints Row 2, Saints Row The Third and Saints Row 4. Largely because every main character is customiseable to a ridiculous extent, and hence the dialogue has to be kept relatively genderless.
It is unfortunate how these threads are rarely about mechanics, or even overall atmosphere. I did ask some questions about how the game plays in the OT, but they've gone unanswered. So, I give up.
Look at this lazy/disgusting/low-hanging-fruit/demeaning/unrealistic "art."It's just classic fantasy, with some exaggerated Japanese flare thrown in. At
it's core, it is based in themes like old Frank Frazetta and Boris Vallejo.
[classic fantasy paintings that were clearly referenced in Dragon's Crown]
This sort of classic fantasy with some Japanese flavor is all they were going for. I just don't see why it should be protested, when works like this are not. As many violent games as I play, I am far more offended by something like civilians getting killed rather than some big, cartoony boobs, but that's just me.
Are you guys buying this for PS3 or Vita?