• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

DrDisrespect permanently banned from Twitch [Now Streaming on YouTube]

No comment.

Also you do realize that you can condemn a person who sexted an underage person AND be against the Trans agenda in schools? They are in fact very, very compatible positions.


He's very invested in keeping this drama to a minimum so I personally don't believe him on a lot of what he said. He's the least reliable narrator we have at the moment imo.
And I am against both. Thanks for catching up.
I doubt there’s any good looking teenage girls that haven’t been hit on by creeps so yes I expect it and I’d teach them how to deal with it. I’m being a realist, not excusing it.
 

HeisenbergFX4

Gold Member
Court of law? I thought this was handled internally with Twitch as there was no crime committed.
It was a settlement both parties agreed upon so you are correct this was not decided in a court of law plus it was a civil case were burden of proof is much less needed to have an outcome
 

Ozriel

M$FT
He did say he didnt, and it is over since he won his case in a court of law, having to obviously show the messages, to sue twitch and he won. Dont know how people are ignoring this fact.

What you are seeing here is the internet mob mentality, virtue signaling and white knighting, by a bunch o dudes that later tonight will type "hot asian teens been fucked by octopus" and jerk off until sunrise.

What ‘court of law’?
Pulling the ‘virtue signaling’ card over sexting a minor is quite the thing indeed.

People and brands don’t want to be associated with someone who’s sexting a minor. Not so hard to understand why.

The man literally came out and admitted to engaging in pretty disgusting behaviour

Show me, I don't see anything disgusting in that statement.

Maybe the part where he admits to having behaved inappropriately?

Court of law? I thought this was handled internally with Twitch as there was no crime committed.

Yeah. He specifically says he never went through any criminal proceedings and instead he went through arbitration on a civil dispute.
 

Thyuda

Member
What ‘court of law’?
Pulling the ‘virtue signaling’ card over sexting a minor is quite the thing indeed.

People and brands don’t want to be associated with someone who’s sexting a minor. Not so hard to understand why.



Maybe the part where he admits to having behaved inappropriately?



Yeah. He specifically says he never went through any criminal proceedings and instead he went through arbitration on a civil dispute.
Twitch payed his contract in full. Twitch. With Amazon lawyer money.

If they had ANYTHING criminal, they would've used it.

Behaving inappropriately doesn't warrant this cicle jerk internet reaction. I'm sorry, it simply doesn't.
 

Eotheod

Member
Filter tools are not going to flag racy messages or know the person posting is a minor.
You would be surprised at the capability of filter tools, especially considering the DM's are most likely converted to plain text. Parsing for particular words isn't hard, and there are a significant amount of source dictionaries to utilise.
 
You would be surprised at the capability of filter tools, especially considering the DM's are most likely converted to plain text. Parsing for particular words isn't hard, and there are a significant amount of source dictionaries to utilise.

Got banned on tinder for my sugar daddy language
 

Topher

Gold Member
It was a settlement both parties agreed upon so you are correct this was not decided in a court of law plus it was a civil case were burden of proof is much less needed to have an outcome

Ok, but a civil case still involves a lawsuit in a court. Sounded to me like it was handled entirely through arbitration as O Ozriel said.

Just making sure I understand the facts.
 

Kings Field

Member
Chris Hansen GIF
 

Astray

Member
Ok, but a civil case still involves a lawsuit in a court. Sounded to me like it was handled entirely through arbitration as O Ozriel said.

Just making sure I understand the facts.
If it's indeed arbitration then it's even worse for his defense force.

Arbitration is explicitly made to find equitable settlements, it isn't made to have a ruling on the morality of whatever happened there..
 

SCB3

Member
I've only be following this very loosely. No thoughts either way on DrDisrespects career - he was always just an amusing weirdo/distraction to me with a 70's porn star tache.

Age of consent is 16 here in the UK. And a minor someone younger than 18. Abusing positions of power/influence is a no no for sure. And its good/right that people stand up for that. But on the other side, is everyone here saying that under no way, shape or form would they ever flirt with a potentially hot 17 yr old? Yeah I'm not convinced.

I'm careful with judging too harshly and quickly, especially when, to the best of my knowledge. No full conversations have been disclosed and the extent of wrong doing established.
The thing is without seeing what he messaged her, he may not even been soliciting her either, like I said earlier it may be a case of banter and him saying something like "suck my dick" to her which is inapproipaite of course, but may not the sexual context that people seem to be angling for

Again, context here is key, no one would like to be falsly accused so this is why evidence is important
 

Ozriel

M$FT
Twitch payed his contract in full. Twitch. With Amazon lawyer money.

If they had ANYTHING criminal, they would've used it.

Behaving inappropriately doesn't warrant this cicle jerk internet reaction. I'm sorry, it simply doesn't.

He did something shitty, which made Twitch let him go. He didn’t eventually meet up for sex, so didn’t commit anything illegal.

People are allowed to disassociate themselves from you if you do odious shit that otherwise isn’t a crime in itself.

The Twitch settlement doesn’t exonerate him one bit. Without a criminal conviction, Twitch probably had to pay for early termination.

Brands he worked with and the Studio he co-founded severed ties with him before the internet frenzy kicked off in earnest, and you’re here insisting it’s all just some ‘woke internet mob’ and ‘cancel culture’.
 

Thyuda

Member
He did something shitty, which made Twitch let him go. He didn’t eventually meet up for sex, so didn’t commit anything illegal.

People are allowed to disassociate themselves from you if you do odious shit that otherwise isn’t a crime in itself.

The Twitch settlement doesn’t exonerate him one bit. Without a criminal conviction, Twitch probably had to pay for early termination.

Brands he worked with and the Studio he co-founded severed ties with him before the internet frenzy kicked off in earnest, and you’re here insisting it’s all just some ‘woke internet mob’ and ‘cancel culture’.
I'm not insisting in anything, I'm being neutral and I judge on what is known. You, on the other hand, are not. And if nothing criminal happened, I don't care. I seriously don't.

And there are countless examples of exactly this happening to innocent people. Look at Depp, Roiland, Kachelmann in Germany, countless cases.
 
Last edited:

VAVA Mk2

Member
There goes any reason to watch Twitch.
Twitch sucked since about 2016 or 2017 onwards. Once it got away from just gaming it became lame. Twitch needs to again offshoot a service that is GAMING only (yes, I know it was an offshoot of Justin.tv) and stay that way.
 

Topher

Gold Member
Twitch payed his contract in full. Twitch. With Amazon lawyer money.

If they had ANYTHING criminal, they would've used it.

Behaving inappropriately doesn't warrant this cicle jerk internet reaction. I'm sorry, it simply doesn't.

Behaving inappropriately with a minor certainly does. No, nothing criminal, but still extremely bad behavior. Remember, Twitch paid him to simply go away.
 

StueyDuck

Member
No he's saying the fact that he said "were there intentions behind those messages" makes it pretty clear that they weren't relating to "yeah, I assfucked that guy in that one match yesterday". He was sending likely sexual messages "without intentions".
The fact that you have to say "likely" means there is still personal assumptions.

I'm sorry but a single weirdly worded legal statement is not enough to go on. Not for us at least.

Remember that neither twitch accuser or the victim here has come out to say what happened, just to again mention "messaging inappropriate messages to a minor"

If we had multiple accounts of "he sent his dick to person" or he said/she said type accusations then we could weigh up who we do and don't believe but right now it's a singular statement and a lot of people seem to be reading what they want to read from it.

As always ill wait for the full story to come out
 
Look the guy is shit. He admitted he texted a minor and now he is saying it was just fun and he never took it serious. Who is believing that. Who is sexting minors just for fun? And even in the unlikely event that he was not serious, even the sexting is already bad enough.
 

Eotheod

Member
Got banned on tinder for my sugar daddy language
Probably because you didn't pay enough money to them rather than the daddy talk.
He did something shitty, which made Twitch let him go. He didn’t eventually meet up for sex, so didn’t commit anything illegal.

People are allowed to disassociate themselves from you if you do odious shit that otherwise isn’t a crime in itself.

The Twitch settlement doesn’t exonerate him one bit. Without a criminal conviction, Twitch probably had to pay for early termination.

Brands he worked with and the Studio he co-founded severed ties with him before the internet frenzy kicked off in earnest, and you’re here insisting it’s all just some ‘woke internet mob’ and ‘cancel culture’.
You do know that in some countries sexting a minor would be considered sexual misconduct or possibly sexual abuse. Depends on the judge/evidence but it most certainly isn't a "nothingburger" like many are trying to play at. I'm speaking in terms of a general though of that conduct, not of any particular person.
 
Last edited:

Astray

Member
He did something shitty, which made Twitch let him go. He didn’t eventually meet up for sex, so didn’t commit anything illegal.

People are allowed to disassociate themselves from you if you do odious shit that otherwise isn’t a crime in itself.

The Twitch settlement doesn’t exonerate him one bit. Without a criminal conviction, Twitch probably had to pay for early termination.

Brands he worked with and the Studio he co-founded severed ties with him before the internet frenzy kicked off in earnest, and you’re here insisting it’s all just some ‘woke internet mob’ and ‘cancel culture’.
We still don't know the extent of the conversations, the personal info of the other side or whatever those conversations led to. We only have his word, which imo, is very untrustworthy given how many times he vacilitated already.

But the way he's trying very hard to minimize it kinda tells us there's something he needs to be minimized.

Twitch payed him because they had to.
You speak with extreme confidence about facts you clearly don't have. That won't end badly I'm very sure.
 

StueyDuck

Member
I know people did their own investigations and fired him and his friends are cutting him loose left and right

And the wording used to fire him was strong

People can stay in his corner if they like but personally I wouldn't support anything he is linked to
and people did the same to Johnny Depp, Disney axed him from Pirates even, with the whole Amber Heard debacle.

i think not having any strong opinion one way or another is what we all should do until more of the truth comes out
 
Last edited:

Astray

Member
I know people did their own investigations and fired him and his friends are cutting him loose left and right
The game dev studio of all companies cutting him off was a sure-fire sign for me that there was something.

They had every incentive to stick by him considering their game's nature and how it's been marketed, and they not only cut the cord, but they cut it very decisively.
 

Ozriel

M$FT
I'm not insisting in anything, I'm being neutral and I judge on what is known. You, on the other hand, are not. And if nothing criminal happened, I don't care. I seriously don't.

Good for you. But some other people do care. And it’s weird for you lot to heckle those who care.

And there are countless examples of exactly this happening to innocent people. Look at Depp, Roiland, Kachelmann in Germany, countless cases.

I followed the Depp case religiously. I celebrated his victory.
At no time did Depp write up a long tweet claiming he ‘made a mistake’ and did something inappropriate to his wife.
 

near

Gold Member
Do people genuinely believe that if there was anything criminal within the those conversation logs that Twitch as a company would turn a blind eye and not inform authorities? I just honestly don’t see that as a possibility. Especially considering that he sued them for a decision they made based on that said conversation.

The conversation is most likely damning on the surface, due to the inappropriate nature but probably does not step outside the boundaries of the law. It’s incomprehensible to me that people sat on this information for years knowing that he is a predator. He most likely isn’t, but will be labelled one regardless now.

No, that's what you think it is.
There is a clip of Doc years back explaining why he is suing them. We get the gist of it from that clip. The contract is educated speculation because Twitch use to dish out massive contracts to there biggest streamers, this was during the time some of them were being headhunted by Mixer. He specifically said that he was suing for financial losses, and the damaged networking, sponsorship reputation/losses due to the ban itself.

That's the point, isn't it?

We don't know. And that's all there is. Everything else is speculation.
Twitch’s only statement when they banned him:

"We take appropriate action when we have evidence that a streamer has acted in violation of our Community Guidelines or Terms of Service"
 
Last edited:

HeisenbergFX4

Gold Member
and people did the same to Johnny Depp, Disney axed him from Pirates even, with the whole Amber Heard debacle.

i think not having any strong opinion one way or another is what we all should do until more of the truth comes out
Thing is everyone wants to compare Depp and Avellone and countless others but remind me please when any of them made a statement saying they kind of admitted to doing what was said?

I think all of those people yelled at every chance they got they were innocent no?

Plus I am not telling everyone what we should all do or how we should all feel so people need to stop telling others who they should feel as well, just my 2 cents
 

Topher

Gold Member
Thing is everyone wants to compare Depp and Avellone and countless others but remind me please when any of them made a statement saying they kind of admitted to doing what was said?

I think all of those people yelled at every chance they got they were innocent no?

Plus I am not telling everyone what we should all do or how we should all feel so people need to stop telling others who they should feel as well, just my 2 cents

yeah, this is nothing like the Johnny Depp-Amber Heard case.
 

StueyDuck

Member
Thing is everyone wants to compare Depp and Avellone and countless others but remind me please when any of them made a statement saying they kind of admitted to doing what was said?

I think all of those people yelled at every chance they got they were innocent no?

Plus I am not telling everyone what we should all do or how we should all feel so people need to stop telling others who they should feel as well, just my 2 cents
but those countless others exist, meaning one shouldn't jump to any conclusion.

I'm not telling anyone who they support, the opposite actually, no one should be supported, we need the full story.
 
Last edited:

Ozriel

M$FT
That's the point, isn't it?

We don't know. And that's all there is. Everything else is speculation.

Apparently the details of the settlement are NDAed. But two ex-employees of Twitch have come forward to claim they’re privy to the details and they paint an extremely unflattering picture of the dude’s actions.

We don’t know how true these claims are, but it’s inaccurate to paint a picture as if these claims don’t exist.
 

Topher

Gold Member
So show me. Not your interpretation, concrete proof.

Seriously?

"Everyone has been wanting to know why I was banned from twitch, but for reasons outside of my control, I was not allowed to say anything for the last several years. Now that two former twitch employees have publicly disclosed the accusations, I can now tell you my side of the story regarding the ban.

Were there twitch whisper messages with an individual minor back in 2017? The answer is yes. Were there real intentions behind these messages, the answer is absolutely not. These were casual, mutual conversations that sometimes leaned too much in the direction of being inappropriate, but nothing more. Nothing illegal happened, no pictures were shared, no crimes were committed, I never even met the individual. I went through a lengthy arbitration regarding a civil dispute with twitch and that case was resolved by a settlement. Let me be clear, it was not a criminal case against me and no criminal charges have ever been brought against me."

 

HeisenbergFX4

Gold Member
but those countless others exist, meaning one shouldn't jump to any conclusion.

I'm not telling anyone who they support, the opposite actually, no one should be supported, we need the full story.
Again didn't those countless others say at every turn they were innocent?

Doc at first tried spinning it he didn't do anything wrong now he is admitting to something
 

Thyuda

Member
Seriously?

"Everyone has been wanting to know why I was banned from twitch, but for reasons outside of my control, I was not allowed to say anything for the last several years. Now that two former twitch employees have publicly disclosed the accusations, I can now tell you my side of the story regarding the ban.

Were there twitch whisper messages with an individual minor back in 2017? The answer is yes. Were there real intentions behind these messages, the answer is absolutely not. These were casual, mutual conversations that sometimes leaned too much in the direction of being inappropriate, but nothing more. Nothing illegal happened, no pictures were shared, no crimes were committed, I never even met the individual. I went through a lengthy arbitration regarding a civil dispute with twitch and that case was resolved by a settlement. Let me be clear, it was not a criminal case against me and no criminal charges have ever been brought against me."


So Twitch confirmed this? Hm?
Doc literally writes "my side of the ban" lmao
 
Last edited:

Astray

Member
Do people genuinely believe that if there was anything criminal within the those conversation logs that Twitch as a company would turn a blind eye and not inform authorities?
Twitch is not a mandated reporter. They have no obligation to report Doc to the authorities, and that suited them fine because they had every incentive to avoid drama while cutting him loose.

They're not good people either.

So Twitch confirmed this? Hm?
Are Twitch and its (ex)employees reliable sources to you or not? We all know that even if Twitch says anything it you will disregard it if it doesn't serve your agenda.

The constant moving of goal posts makes you look even more ridiculous.
 

Thyuda

Member
Twitch is not a mandated reporter. They have no obligation to report Doc to the authorities, and that suited them fine because they had every incentive to avoid drama while cutting him loose.

They're not good people either.


Are Twitch and its (ex)employees reliable sources to you or not? We all know that even if Twitch says anything it you will disregard it if it doesn't serve your agenda.

The constant moving of goal posts makes you look even more ridiculous.
Twitch hasn't made an official statement.

Keep reaching.
 
Top Bottom