Revolutionary
Member
Duncan Jones' Moon is one of my favorite films of the past decade, and made him a director to look out for. Source Code was great as well IMO, though some don't think so highly of it. Warcraft, on the other hand, suffered from studio intervention and was torn apart by critics and audiences alike.
Mute was supposed to be his return to form as well as a return to the universe he created with Moon (more on that later), but unfortunately the film seems to fall well short of expectations and hopes.
What the critics are saying:
It currently holds a 5% Rotten Tomatoes score, but that's bound to change at least a little as more reviews roll in.The Independent – Christopher Hooton – 1/5
When Paul Rudd's antics and the kidnapping storyline finally combine, it's in a woefully confusing way that manages to be both boring and melodramatic while giving paedophilia one of the most curious cinematic treatments on record.
The Guardian – Charles Bramesco – 1/5
Watching Jones passively bob in the deep end of his imagination, a viewer longs for the compulsory baseline competence of the big studios – anything but the blandness masquerading as future cult bait.
The Telegraph – Ed Cumming – 2/5
The script has none of the reserved cool which made Moon so appealing. In the circumstances, Skarsgård might feel he escaped lightly with a part that involves almost no speaking. The plot hangs on relationships which simply don’t ring true. [Paul] Rudd, in particular, is poorly cast, lacking the menace his role demands. Jones conjured intimacy on the surface of the moon, but in the crowded streets of futuristic Berlin, there’s no real feeling.
Variety – Peter Debruge
an over-designed but otherwise uninspired slice of sci-fi noir — a stock missing-persons mystery in which a wordless bartender goes searching for his girlfriend through the sketchy near-future Berlin underworld.
The Hollywood Reporter - Sheri Linden
All the genre bells and whistles, however finely crafted, get in the way of the story’s undercurrents of longing and grief.
Uproxx – Amy Nicholson
I should be clear that Mute isn’t a good movie. It manages to be both bizarre and boring. While I admire Jones’ inventive details like a bowling ball that looks like a giant die, or a severed cow cartoon shilling for steak, or the way cell phones have advanced to where people don’t acknowledge they’ve answered a ring before screaming hello into a startled room, the film simply looks cheap.
LA Times – Kevin Crust
Jones reportedly conceived of the film years ago. However, as the story evolved and took on more emotional themes he never found the right balance between the sentimental and the hard-boiled. As resonant as the personal may potentially be, it gets lost in a quagmire of influences.
GameSpot - Michael Rougeau
Mute is a bad joke about itself, the movie version of a Weird Al Yankovic song (an “Amish Paradise” sequel set in the future?), only if the filmmaker wasn’t aware it was supposed to be a parody. It’s like Mute underwent so many rewrites that the scenes and characters no longer match up – or like it’s a first draft that never underwent a single edit, though considering how long Jones was trying to get this made – 12 years! – the former seems more likely.
GQ – Tom Philip
Doing the talking here instead are two black market American surgeons, Cactus Bill and Duck (Paul Rudd and Justin Theroux), who make good use of their chemistry and comedy bona fides to bring some effective, unrehearsed levity to some corners of Mute. That is until a dreadfully tasteless (and needless!) subplot ruins that, too. If there is redemption to this film, it comes in Rudd and Theroux’s easy partnership and some impressive set design work. But that’s about it.
The Wrap – Robert Abele
Ultimately, it’s hard to sense the same director who embedded us so thoroughly in the carefully heightened atmosphere of philosophical adventure that was “Moon.” Here, a Sam Rockwell cameo glimpsed in a news clip detailing a Lunar Industries imbroglio clues us in that “Mute” is set in the same world as that earlier film. But the connection doesn’t extend, regrettably, to the filmmaker behind both movies.
ScreenRant – Sandy Schaefer
Mute is a middle of the road sci-fi/Noir offering that resembles a lower-grade version of the actual Blade Runner sequel that came out last year, Blade Runner 2049. Jones spent several years working on the project, but the final movie result feels like an intriguing concept that he simply wasn’t able to realize as fully.
As for my thoughts on the film, I think it's just "ok". I found the protagonist's motivations to be a little difficult to relate to, even if his intuition that something happened was ultimately correct. Pacing is all over the place, to the point where I started to think if this would have been better served as a miniseries. And like the critics, I found the pedophilia story arc to be laughable and poorly handled.
The scene where Paul Rudd is giving the performance of his life immediately leading into a scene where Justin Theroux (the pedophile) is joyriding through a sunroof of a car was fucking bizarre.
PS: I know the past two threads of mine have been about Netflix but I assure you I'm not a shill. I haven't even subscribed to it for nearly a year up until Cloverfield Paradox (Yes, there are.. 'alternative' methods to viewing Netflix movies). Regardless, I'm letting my subscription lapse this month for sure.
Last edited: