• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

E3 rumours from our 2ch cousins

what could that be?

surley not Bungie or Rare, since they are fully owned by MS...

but what else counts as a betrayal?

there are not that many exclusive games..

Big blue box/Lionhead goes Ps3?

Digital Anvil :lol
 
SpokkX said:
what could that be?

surley not Bungie or Rare, since they are fully owned by MS...

but what else counts as a betrayal?

there are not that many exclusive games..

Big blue box/Lionhead goes Ps3?

Digital Anvil :lol

:lol @ Digital Anvil
 
SpokkX said:
what could that be?

surley not Bungie or Rare, since they are fully owned by MS...

but what else counts as a betrayal?

there are not that many exclusive games..

Big blue box/Lionhead goes Ps3?

Digital Anvil :lol

sega :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol
 
Sony, betraying themselves, will sign exclusive rights to GTA. This will anger Sony, and cause them to subsequently cancel the deal.
 
It doesn't have to relate to things that are currently exclusive...maybe something that's exclusive now that wasn't before?

In the other thread, people gravitated toward GTA being made wholly exclusive to PS3, or perhaps EA "skipping" X360 when it comes to certain big games (at least till PS3 was out..).

It could really be anything, though, undoubtedly expectations will get well out of control and no matter what's announced, it'll be disappointing. It is the way of the megaton.
 
PhatSaqs said:
Welcome to the new Hinting-Age Forums :D

This is nothing compared to when oxygen would ;);););) every time someone mentioned Square back in the day.

We've been through all this before, we'll be through it again :P
 
Please shut GAF down for 7 days.
Then we can all come back, with no nails or fingers left, heart palpatations all over the show, and find out what happened.
 
SpokkX said:
what could that be?

surley not Bungie or Rare, since they are fully owned by MS...

but what else counts as a betrayal?

there are not that many exclusive games..

Big blue box/Lionhead goes Ps3?

Digital Anvil :lol
Isn't Digital Anvil MS owned as well?

The only notable external developer who's really pro-Xbox I can think of is Team Ninja. Most western devs favor multiplatform development anyway. :/
 
Clue: Will piss fanboys off
Clue: Izzy laughing at the suggestion of a defection, and how it is 'so not that'.

So its the opposite - Sony buying someone and therefore locking people out of their games if they buy other platforms.

Sony take a larger stake in SE?
Sony buy R*?
Sony buy one of the other major Japanese 3rd parties (Namco, Capcom, SEGA!?)
 
i told you guys already

Sony buying a controlling share of Tecmo. Tecmo is going to become basically a second party! Itagaki does not leave in protest but swims in his glorious pools of money.
 
needs to be bigger than Tecmo for DC to want Sony to burn in hell.

What games is DC a big fan of that he might want on Xbox live? Something personal to get him riled like that?




edit - I love this shit - its like fishing but without real fish. Very relaxing
 
Amir0x said:
i told you guys already

Sony buying a controlling share of Tecmo. Tecmo is going to become basically a second party! Itagaki does not leave in protest but swims in his glorious pools of money.
If they promis me Tecmo Bowl 3, I'll buy a ps3 launch day.
 
mrklaw said:
needs to be bigger than Tecmo for DC to want Sony to burn in hell.

What games is DC a big fan of that he might want on Xbox live? Something personal to get him riled like that?

DCharlie is angry on the whole principle of the thing!
 
I never figured him for a 'fight the establishment' thing, being so....establishment, but maybe all those years in banking has messed with his brain. He has been grouchy lately, I might start an 'I love DC' thread to show him we care :)

computer says no.
 
Jonnyram said:
Hey guys, the thing DC and co are talking about might not be game-related, you know. Well not directly anyway :P

Honestly there's so many "mini-megatons" and "true megatons" and stabbings and death defying twists going on that I don't know WHAT anyone is refferring to anymore.

I got lost in the fray days ago :P
 
mrklaw said:
Clue: Will piss fanboys off
Clue: Izzy laughing at the suggestion of a defection, and how it is 'so not that'.

Either you're getting confused or I am ;)

I think: Izzy was laughing at the suggestion that what they're talking about HERE in THIS thread is a defection. What they're talking about HERE in THIS thread is something to do with Cell and/or a possible scenario where Sony could screw early adopters (or so it seems to me).

The OTHER thread is talking about a defection..we had an explicit hint about one (KoTOR), and then there was talk of "betrayal" regarding another one...(though I don't think the word "defection" was used so much with respect to that) I don't think Izzy ever disagreed with these hints.

mrklaw said:
So its the opposite - Sony buying someone and therefore locking people out of their games if they buy other platforms.

Sony take a larger stake in SE?
Sony buy R*?
Sony buy one of the other major Japanese 3rd parties (Namco, Capcom, SEGA!?)

The thing they're hinting at in the other thread could easily be the prevention of what would be normally expected to go to MS's system, going to that system. Not necessarily a defection, but still possibly a betrayal (aka, "sorry, we can't put this on your system anymore").

Who knows though.

Jonnyram said:
Hey guys, the thing DC and co are talking about might not be game-related, you know. Well not directly anyway :P

I wondered about this, but Izzy said something along the lines of "I can't believe MS didn't get this one". Which makes it sound game-related, but..

Have something to share? ;)
 
Amir0x said:
Honestly there's so many "mini-megatons" and "true megatons" and stabbings and death defying twists going on that I don't know WHAT anyone is refferring to anymore.

I got lost in the fray days ago :P

Atomic Megaton bomb omb!
 
- The only megaton will be in my pants after looking at next-gen games. I've said too much.
whistling.gif
 
I have no idea what this is about.
Though I might point to some vague posts I made once and pretend I did after the event...














*cough*
 
Amir0x said:
You put a cherry on top of this and you got yourself a deal!

:lol I wish E3 could come sooner than 7 days. In the last days the rumors will becoming even more frequent.
 
well, there's always "In exchange for completely waiving platform fees, Sony guarantees that only the PS3/PSP versions of EA titles will be online"
 
Folder said:
I have no idea what this is about.
Though I might point to some vague posts I made once and pretend I did after the event...














*cough*

COUGH!? Holy shit, cough starts with a C! Capcom purchased by SONY!?
 
The End said:
well, there's always "In exchange for completely waiving platform fees, Sony guarantees that only the PS3/PSP versions of EA titles will be online"

This was suggested in the other thread, and indeed it would be "teh megaton" (a big shot in the arm for Sony's online credibility, and simultaneous blow to MS's, one of their big strengths). It's feasible when you also consider EA wasn't exactly convinced by MS's online model..this way they'd have an excuse for not supporting it anymore, and gain something in the process.

But it seems a little big to happen IMO.
 
So basically

Nintendo have been bought by Eidos.

Eidos blew all the War Chest on LAra Croft merchandise.
No one bought it cos, PSP had PRON

Sony bought out Nintendo and used Mario and Peach as a pimp and Whore in new GTA. M$ bought Sony out after Stringer suddenly displayed strange behaviour and sold Nintendo off to M$. Namco then decided just to make a game for the hell of it with all KNOWN gaming IP's and made so much money they bought everyone out and closed down the gaming industry?


IS THAT RIGHT??
 
even better, let's say that EA gets to charge seperately for their games.

that would fulfill the "nasty requirement"
 
gofreak said:
This was suggested in the other thread, and indeed it would be "teh megaton" (a big shot in the arm for Sony's online credibility, and simultaneous blow to MS's, one of their big strengths). It's feasible when you also consider EA wasn't exactly convinced by MS's online model..this way they'd have an excuse for not supporting it anymore, and gain something in the process.

But it seems a little big to happen IMO.

I dunno... now that EA has the exclusive rights to the NFL, it's tough to imagine them doing something like this for their Madden games.
 
Unison said:
I dunno... now that EA has the exclusive rights to the NFL, it's tough to imagine them doing something like this for their Madden games.

well, the terms of the deal pretty clearly require the games be multiplatform, but there's no mention of what features need to be included.
 
The End said:
even better, let's say that EA gets to charge seperately for their games.

Sony will probably follow the same model as PS2 - free, but third parties are also free to charge themselves, encouragement to stay free asides - so this would be a given anyway. Don't expect Sony to follow a Live structure, at least from a backend/publisher point of view. I'll be happy if the enduser experience is seamless and unified across all online games on PS3 (as with Live)..beyond that, I'm not particularly pushed as to the specifics of the backend dealings and implementation, as long as it works.
 
Amir0x said:
COUGH!? Holy shit, cough starts with a C! Capcom purchased by SONY!?

Actually Sony purchasing Capcom would be the biggest megaton I ever heard. Hell would truley break lose here on GAF. I suddenly believe in this news.
 
The End said:
well, the terms of the deal pretty clearly require the games be multiplatform, but there's no mention of what features need to be included.
Just imagine this, MS stops developing sport games so they get the full support of EA. Then EA stops developing sport games for MS platforms. Biggest betrayal ever!
By no means am I implying this is what happened or will happen of course.
 
gofreak said:
But it seems a little big to happen IMO.
Agreed. EA also accounts for around ~15-20% of PS2 3rd party license fees, I don't see SCEI dropping that just for online bragging rights. That'd be a huge money drain at a time they need to recoup investment more than ever (after just launching two loss taking platforms).
 
The End said:
well, the terms of the deal pretty clearly require the games be multiplatform, but there's no mention of what features need to be included.

But it would slaughter Xbox sales of Madden w/ no benefit to the NFL (who probably have some kind of per-unit royalty).... I dont see how that would fly, but stranger things have happened.
 
Blimblim said:
Just imagine this, MS stops developing sport games so they get the full support of EA. Then EA stops developing sport games for MS platforms. Biggest betrayal ever!
By no means am I implying this is what happened or will happen of course.


Bill Gates am cry.
 
The fact that ALL Xbox360 games are required to be Live Aware shows that MS is as serious as ever about XBL, so I think we're barking up the wrong tree with the EA talk...
 
After Capcom's disappointing transition to Nintendo last generation, I could see them going back to Sony and becoming an exclusive third party, or being bought out. I find that the most likely.

Blizzard would probably go MS if anything, due to the similarity to the PC architecture. However, I know nothing but what my friends in MS tell me. And they only talk about the 360 architecture, not the games.
 
Unison said:
The fact that ALL Xbox360 games are required to be Live Aware shows that MS is as serious as ever about XBL, so I think we're barking up the wrong tree with the EA talk...


MS would gladly take a crippled Madden rather than have no football on their platform.
 
gofreak said:
This was suggested in the other thread, and indeed it would be "teh megaton" (a big shot in the arm for Sony's online credibility, and simultaneous blow to MS's, one of their big strengths). It's feasible when you also consider EA wasn't exactly convinced by MS's online model..this way they'd have an excuse for not supporting it anymore, and gain something in the process.

But it seems a little big to happen IMO.


not only that i bet there is something in those exclusivity contracts with the sports franchises that ensures they will be on every platform. it wouldnt all be EA's decision anymore.
 
Roland Hood said:
And will probably get 'Game of the Show'

Hey, if they can deliver something that manages to have the same impact as that original MGS2 trailer again, it deserves the award...
 
trmas said:
After Capcom's disappointing transition to Nintendo last generation, I could see them going back to Sony and becoming an exclusive third party, or being bought out. I find that the most likely.
Transition to Nintendo? They published over 100 PS2 games (compared to less than 20 for GameCube). :/
 
The End said:
MS would gladly take a crippled Madden rather than have no football on their platform.

But I still fail to see how it would benefit the NFL...

Also, Xbox360 is going to have Madden THIS YEAR. Are you predicting it won't be online?
 
hmmm competing megatons

che has said their is a ms megaton and people here are saying there is a sony megaton, fun times
 
...

This thread is comedy gold.

I can't wait until E3. There's going to be something for all 3 major console maker fanboys to gloat about a little and there will be a "twist" that may bring GAF server down in flames when it gets announced.

Fun times ahead.
 
ddkawaii said:
...

This thread is comedy gold.

I can't wait until E3. There's going to be something for all 3 major console maker fanboys to gloat about a little and there will be a "twist" that may bring GAF server down in flames when it gets announced.

Fun times ahead.

Like I said: This is going to be, without doubt, the greatest E3 ever.
 
Top Bottom