Bad company 2 was the better game hands down between bc2 and b3... hope they realize this and make the necessary changes
The best thing to come out of BF4 would be if the story somehow leads to bf2142. Just go full on fanfic with the story. Why else would you tease 2142 in every single dlc release.
Secretly hoping for 128 players for next gen consoles with 8 men squads.
I think Wii U owners will be the most disappointed. Current gen console owners aren't getting much of an upgrade over BF3, but they'll at least be getting the game. PC gamers and next gen console owners will benefit the most. DICE is probably gonna sex up the destruction and boost up the scale a bit, and tighten up the graphics on level 3.
Agreed.
720p 60FPS please!
I know few care about the single player in Battlefield, but I really hope that they put more effort into this one. There's no reason why Battlefield should have the same linear gameplay approach and small map approach that the CoD games have. They should be more of an open warzone like the series became known for with it's multiplayer. One of the most disappointed moments from this gen for me was the jet mission in BF3. All that build up with your soldier walking to the jet and then...an entirely scripted sequence. :/
I think they did say 1080p 60fps on the ps4.
Is it even possible? Stable 60fps with destruction and a bunch of vehicles on screen?The people who enjoyed BC2 more than BF3, what was the reason exactly? Also which platforms did they play both games?
I liked both and hope that BF4 is an amalgamation of the two games. My biggest gripe against BF3 was the iffy framerate and lack of polish early on. Patches have improved it but it was glitchy.
1080p 60FPS! C'mon! Believe.
32 players and no jets or prone?
Don't forget the horrible gunplay.
BC2 was a garbage game through and through. The only reason someone would think it was a good game is if that haven't played BF2 or BF2142 before.
Gunplay sucked. Maps were worse than BC1, 32 players, no jets, small maps, no prone. BF3 is a terrible game in some respects compared to BF2, but BC2 is on a different level of garbage.
Let's hope DICE ignores all this nonsense for BC3.This. The gunplay in BF3 is outstanding. It just feels perfect. Sure, there's the instances of getting hit behind cover, but it doesn't bother me. Internets and all that.
As I've said before, BF3 is the best game released this gen.
NoRéN;49476738 said:Please work Day 1.
But they also teased dinosaurs in all their DLC. Maybe 2142 will be the first DLC for BF4 like how Karkand was for BF3.
The only thing is I still want B2K maps in BF4. I can still play them forever. Well other than wake which similar to BF2 is broken by jet balancing. Talk about a true remake lol
I assume they want more destruction, since the base game in BF3 didn't have nearly as much.
More health/higher TTK
Better balance among the classes. Was ridiculous to give the revive button, health, and the best weapons to one class.
Less homogenized guns. It will probably end up the same couple of guns for meta anyways, but guns in BC2 did different damage.
And the AT4/Dart were awesome.
Bring back some of the cool BC2 maps as a free update. Oasis, Laguna Presa.
Separate from BC2:
Fix the damn netcode.
Port in some fan favorite maps from BF3 for free. Its the same engine, more free maps increases the size of your playerbase, who then buy more DLC.
I know few care about the single player in Battlefield, but I really hope that they put more effort into this one. There's no reason why Battlefield should have the same linear gameplay approach and small map approach that the CoD games have. They should be more of an open warzone like the series became known for with it's multiplayer. One of the most disappointed moments from this gen for me was the jet mission in BF3. All that build up with your soldier walking to the jet and then...an entirely scripted sequence. :/
The people who enjoyed BC2 more than BF3, what was the reason exactly? Also which platforms did they play both games?
I liked both and hope that BF4 is an amalgamation of the two games. My biggest gripe against BF3 was the iffy framerate and lack of polish early on. Patches have improved it but it was glitchy.
1080p 60FPS! C'mon! Believe.
I played both games on PC and BC 2 is the superior game, BF 3 feels slow and very clunky with all the excessive super slow animations for everything. Also BC2 is very very balanced, BF3's engi is way too OP and for some reason the game doesnt lend itself to teamplay.
I was so excited for BF 3 because I just assumed bigger is better but boy was I wrong, after 50 hours of BF 3 I decided to give up on it cuz I was just not having fun.
Lmao. So trueNoRéN;49476738 said:Please work Day 1.
BC2 coined the term "Rambo Medic".
BF3's recon gear is useful for recon. What it's not useful for is camping in a single spot and racking up the kills.You can be Rambo anything in BC 2, go look at sniper montages on youtube, God I miss the throwable c4 and the radar ball in BF3, recon gear is useless in BF 3.
I loved BF3, and I don't get how people say BC2 was better when BF3 does everything that does but better. I can't get back into BC2 these days with the restricted movement and worse gunplay.
The vanilla maps in BF3 weren't the best but all the expansion maps have been good for the most part.
Bad company 3 Bad company 3 Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3
I loved BF3, and I don't get how people say BC2 was better when BF3 does everything that does but better. I can't get back into BC2 these days with the restricted movement and worse gunplay.
The vanilla maps in BF3 weren't the best but all the expansion maps have been good for the most part.
this is why I hope they continue the bad company series... keep that COD shit as far away from the actual franchise as possible, more like BF2 pleaseUntil EA releases another Bad Company I'm not touching any of their games and even after that I won't.Maybe Mirror's Edge 2 but that's it
I'll be buying CoD instead of both this year.
Some people already touched on why there are things that BC2 does better just a few posts above yours.
Sorry but I hope they don't waste development time or money on a single player mode hardly anyone will play just to say they have one.
Bad company 3 Bad company 3 Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3Bad company 3 Bad company 3
The two year development cycle cannot be a good thing. look at Crysis 2 to 3. Or ME2 to 3.
And I don't agree with any of it. How was BF3 slow compared to BC2? BF3 has much more movement options. The movement in BC2 feels clunky in comparison. The one directional running feels so awkward.
I guess the one change I didn't agree with was merging assault and medic, but I still think BF3 is the better game overall. I even think the destruction in BF3 is better. BC2 destruction felt very scripted. Buildings fell down the same way every time.
More health/higher TTK
Better balance among the classes. Was ridiculous to give the revive button, health, and the best weapons to one class.
Less homogenized guns. It will probably end up the same couple of guns for meta anyways, but guns in BC2 did different damage.
And the AT4/Dart were awesome.
Bring back some of the cool BC2 maps as a free update. Oasis, Laguna Presa.
I assume they want more destruction, since the base game in BF3 didn't have nearly as much.
Then they better charge half as much for the game.