Mikey Jr.
Member
It was TWW HD: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_MlImzIKK8
Yep.
Damiani, just a curiosity.
What would you have given wind waker back in the day?
It was TWW HD: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_MlImzIKK8
... No.
Kyle killed it unceremoniously on a whim. Now it lies still and abandoned on the cold table, replaced by "goals".
Damiani tour of the Switch OS/menus - https://youtu.be/KT4n6l5a_AM
Jeeeeez that Zelda DLC question
The slights and snipes sprinkled throughoutYeah that was crap.
Anyone else notice the almost complete disappearance of persuasion/deception/intimidation rolls in TTE, at points it feels more like fiasco than dungeons and dragons honestly. Or maybe they were never there and I've just now noticed lol
Anyway, not much of a complaint just something that was slightly bothering me
Jeeeeez that Zelda DLC question
Nintendo (for better and worse) operates in their own bubble away from the rest of the industry. When they announce something that's "business as usual" it's like ok, are you going to actually deliver on the sort of thing people expect from a season pass or are you going to do some dumb weird Nintendo thingI understood where the author of the email was coming from. I was really confused by the intensity of the discussion. Im mean, positive or negative, I dont think this DLC announcement warranted that intensity of reaction it received. Its not some super amazing announcement, but isnt the worst thing in the world either. Its considerably cheaper than a lot of season passes and seems to offer a lot of value when all the content is released. You are not forced to buy it at launch, or any time at all. The idea that it's content cut from the game and the game isnt done also came up and doesnt have much merit in my opinion, especially because the actual DLC content will be released months after the game went gold. It seems even sillier when one of the last big games released, RE7, had 2 DLC packs release within a month of the game for more than $20, yet I havent seen anyone freak out about that.
Its like some weird Nintendo purity test where they cant have DLC or do season passes because they never did it before (even though they have, multiple times) and Nintendo must be pure. Even the conversation on last weeks podcast on this topic was weak and ended with them saying the announcement would have been better if the DLC had a title and a trailer with character art of a Goron. Because that would have been so much better.
Its fine to not like it (the Switch shirt is definitely stupid), but I find it hard to get so worked up about this DLC model when it has become business as usual in the industry. Season passes are not great, you should never pay for a promise, but weve done this song and dance before and I dont know why it becomes news again when Nintendo does it.
I understood where the author of the email was coming from. I was really confused by the intensity of the discussion. Im mean, positive or negative, I dont think this DLC announcement warranted that intensity of reaction it received. Its not some super amazing announcement, but isnt the worst thing in the world either. Its considerably cheaper than a lot of season passes and seems to offer a lot of value when all the content is released. You are not forced to buy it at launch, or any time at all. The idea that it's content cut from the game and the game isnt done also came up and doesnt have much merit in my opinion, especially because the actual DLC content will be released months after the game went gold. It seems even sillier when one of the last big games released, RE7, had 2 DLC packs release within a month of the game for more than $20, yet I havent seen anyone freak out about that.
Its like some weird Nintendo purity test where they cant have DLC or do season passes because they never did it before (even though they have, multiple times) and Nintendo must be pure. Even the conversation on last weeks podcast on this topic was weak and ended with them saying the announcement would have been better if the DLC had a title and a trailer with character art of a Goron. Because that would have been so much better.
Its fine to not like it (the Switch shirt is definitely stupid), but I find it hard to get so worked up about this DLC model when it has become business as usual in the industry. Season passes are not great, you should never pay for a promise, but weve done this song and dance before and I dont know why it becomes news again when Nintendo does it.
For what it's worth, the witcher 3 also used the expansion pass term. However they are very in tune with the cynical side of the market and told people that they really didn't need to buy it if they wanted to wait and see.So, here's the thing. Nintendo is super late to the party with DLC, even with MK8, and thus they have a lot to prove. After all, they have next to no track record and none with Zelda. Here's what we know (and i try my best not to add my opinion on any of this):
1) There is very little description for each part of the DLC. We aren't even sure what hard mode is, whats in the other chests, or what the "unique story" will be
2) You can't buy them individually. It means that they know that each part of the DLC may not be "sellable" on its own merit, so they are bundling it all together.
3) Elements of this DLC has been included in Zelda games before, such as the Cave of Trials.
4) There have been large cuts to Zelda games before. Wind Waker had major cuts, so a concern is valid that they may be doing what they couldnt do for Wind waker, saving an unfinished dungeon to finish in the DLC
5) No one is asking Nintendo to be pure, but even they are trying to be "different" by calling it an extended pass instead of a season pass. They are trying to distance themselves from the stereotype that comes with Season pass instead of calling a spade a spade.
So with all we know, and with all we dont know, its so hard for myself and many other to champion this as a good thing. Nintendo needs to impress upon how this is a good thing for us instead of a thing that's meant to make more money, because with everything, I can only see it as the latter. It doesnt even sound like they are excited about their own DLC. Remember how they talked about breath of the wild? It was "imagine the possibilities. Those mountains? You can go there" and with the DLC its a bullet point on a power point presentation like we are some investors. The nail in the coffin for me is that it isnt a part of the Master edition.
Nintendo (for better and worse) operates in their own bubble away from the rest of the industry. When they announce something that's "business as usual" it's like ok, are you going to actually deliver on the sort of thing people expect from a season pass or are you going to do some dumb weird Nintendo thing
The vagueness and lack of prior examples from Nintendo (Mario Kart 8 does not count) makes it hard to really be positive about it. Maybe it doesn't necessarily warrant strong negativity right out of the gate but the fact is that their first two "packs" are complete nonsense including a Switch shirt, Hard Mode, and a dumb challenge dungeon (the only thing really warranting the title of "new content") while the actual story expansion won't release until the Winter
I get it. I think people freaking out about things like YOU SHOULD NEVER PRE-ORDER EVER, ANTI-CONSUMER should chill. But seeing Nintendo classify dumb things as premium bullet points gives the vibe that the vague "story expansion" won't be anything major either. It's obviously assuming, but all people can do is speculate based on what they're told
re: the pod
aww none of them remembered NSMBU. really really good game. I feel bad for any Nintendo fan who never got a chance to play it. by far the best NSMB game, and by extension the best 2D Mario since SMW.
Zelda is very dear to gamers. It brings out the best and worst.
So, here's the thing. Nintendo is super late to the party with DLC, even with MK8, and thus they have a lot to prove. After all, they have next to no track record and none with Zelda.
Here's what we know (and i try my best not to add my opinion on any of this):
1) There is very little description for each part of the DLC. We aren't even sure what hard mode is, whats in the other chests, or what the "unique story" will be
2) You can't buy them individually. It means that they know that each part of the DLC may not be "sellable" on its own merit, so they are bundling it all together.
3) Elements of this DLC has been included in Zelda games before, such as the Cave of Trials.
4) There have been large cuts to Zelda games before. Wind Waker had major cuts, so a concern is valid that they may be doing what they couldnt do for Wind waker, saving an unfinished dungeon to finish in the DLC
5) No one is asking Nintendo to be pure, but even they are trying to be "different" by calling it an extended pass instead of a season pass. They are trying to distance themselves from the stereotype that comes with Season pass instead of calling a spade a spade.
So with all we know, and with all we dont know, its so hard for myself and many other to champion this as a good thing. Nintendo needs to impress upon how this is a good thing for us instead of a thing that's meant to make more money, because with everything, I can only see it as the latter. It doesnt even sound like they are excited about their own DLC. Remember how they talked about breath of the wild? It was "imagine the possibilities. Those mountains? You can go there" and with the DLC its a bullet point on a power point presentation like we are some investors. The nail in the coffin for me is that it isnt a part of the Master edition.
For what it's worth, the witcher 3 also used the expansion pass term. However they are very in tune with the cynical side of the market and told people that they really didn't need to buy it if they wanted to wait and see.
I don't think people should hold the vagueness against it though. There are plenty of passes sold when the devs don't even know as much about the new content as we know of Zelda. I really have no fear that this is anything that was meant to be in the main game. Don't feel it's worth it? then don't buy it or wait to see if it's something you want.
Mario Kart 8: We are going to release 2 packs of 4 new tracks each with 2 new characters and vehicles, buy now and you get colored yoshisy tho
Hyrule Warriors, Smash, Fire Emblem, New Super Mario Bros., Pikmin 3 and Mario Kart 8 all got paid DLC with varying levels of 'fairness' in regards to their pricing, and I think there's enough evidence to suggest the Zelda season pass will be average to good in terms of content.
re: the pod
aww none of them remembered NSMBU. really really good game. I feel bad for any Nintendo fan who never got a chance to play it. by far the best NSMB game, and by extension the best 2D Mario since SMW.
the Wii U's legacy will be mighty.
NSBMU - best 2D Mario since SMW
Mario 3D World - best 3D Mario since 64
DKC: TF - best DKC since 2
Yoshi's Woolly World - best Yoshi game since the first one
Mario Kart 8 - maybe the best Mario Kart
Smash 4
Splatoon
Mario Maker
Bayonetta 2
Wonderful 101
Pikmin 3
Xenoblade X
a motherfucking Zelda Dynasty Warriors game
the Dreamcast is looked back on so fondly now, and the Wii U shits all over it.
Dreamcast sucks. Then and Now.
Wii U is a good console if you like every single game that Nintendo makes. I like about 2/3rds the games they make, which makes it a very frustrating console.
Oh I am referring to the pass specifically. They've really laid out the basics of what the pass will get you. The rest could either be spoilers or is just too early to say much about.Oh hey Blood,
I agree that I doubt its cut content. Even then thats such a broad term, it may be dungeon that was concepted at one point but never actually in production, I do not think that it was something already in production.
But I disagree about the vagueness. Maybe its not fair but I think Nintendo is being too vague in general right now, about the Switch and the UI, about the games on the horizon, Virtual console, streaming apps, and a whole mess of other things.
I think the vagueness is hurting them. Yeah, Im not buying this DLC till pack 3 comes out and I can judge for myself, but Im not evaluating that. Im looking at if this is a good thing for Nintendo and the Zelda franchise and I do not think so.
the Dreamcast is looked back on so fondly now, and the Wii U shits all over it.
oh yeah, totally frustrating. the lack ofgames was infuriating/laughable, but there's enough games on it where it'll be looked back on more than fondly 10-15-20 years from now.
when you think of how great the system like the Genesis or N64 was now, you think of maybe like 5 games.
re: the pod
aww none of them remembered NSMBU. really really good game. I feel bad for any Nintendo fan who never got a chance to play it. by far the best NSMB game, and by extension the best 2D Mario since SMW.
the Wii U's legacy will be mighty.
NSBMU - best 2D Mario since SMW
Mario 3D World - best 3D Mario since 64
DKC: TF - best DKC since 2
Yoshi's Woolly World - best Yoshi game since the first one
Mario Kart 8 - maybe the best Mario Kart
Smash 4
Splatoon
Mario Maker
Bayonetta 2
Wonderful 101
Pikmin 3
Xenoblade X
a motherfucking Zelda Dynasty Warriors game
the Dreamcast is looked back on so fondly now, and the Wii U shits all over it.
It's kinda sad even Nintendo has abandoned instruction manuals. They had the best ones out there, always full-color and detailed.
While I disagree with a lot of your list's franchise comparisons, I accept that we have different opinions on the entries. But Wii U better than the Dreamcast? Absolutely not. Which one will have a bigger impact in history? Dreamcast all the fucking way.
It's a good thing imo. I get that we all read the manuals in the back seat of the car on the way home from the store when we were kids, but continuing that for tradition's sake isn't a good justification for the material waste.
Hate the joycons, pro controller all the way.