Put it this way, if Major League Baseball were just now opening a Hall of Fame and they had limits on who could be in there from the beginning...we'd have a gigantic backlog of "Greats" not in because there has already been decades and decades of history. You'd get dumb arguments like "does Hank Aaron belong in the Hall of Fame more than Ted Williams?" when it's incredibly obvious both are "one of the greats" already and both belong. Like next time they might be battling over Mario 3 vs. Ocarina of Time vs. FF7 for 2 spots which just ain't right when they all obviously deserve that extremely prestigious title.
Each year new baseball players are inducted into the Hall of Fame. They aren't all obviously at the caliber of a Willie Mays, but they've all established a baseline of excellence that made them worthy. A Hall of Fame or "HoG" isn't a specific ranking, it just acknowledges that their mostly undeniable excellence.
re: frame trap
I'm surprised none of em picked Zelda as what they think EZAGOTY2017 will be. i think it's a lock
Put it this way, if Major League Baseball were just now opening a Hall of Fame and they had limits on who could be in there from the beginning...we'd have a gigantic backlog of "Greats" not in because there has already been decades and decades of history. You'd get dumb arguments like "does Hank Aaron belong in the Hall of Fame more than Ted Williams?" when it's incredibly obvious both are "one of the greats" already and both belong. Like next time they might be battling over Mario 3 vs. Ocarina of Time vs. FF7 for 2 spots which just ain't right when they all obviously deserve that extremely prestigious title.
Each year new baseball players are inducted into the Hall of Fame. They aren't all obviously at the caliber of a Willie Mays, but they've all established a baseline of excellence that made them worthy. A Hall of Fame or "HoG" isn't a specific ranking, it just acknowledges that their mostly undeniable excellence.
I have absolutely no clue who any of those baseball players are but I think comparing the two is a bit silly because 1. Baseball has a far longer history than videogames, so I'm guessing even with all the people already in it, there's still tons of players you could go back and comfortably induct and 2. the MLB Hall of Fame is presumably voted on by a shitload more than 9 (or 6) people, so any left field picks (like Don has for AC4) are drowned out.
I don't really think having a giant backlog of greats is a bad thing. Sure, Mario 3, OoT and FFVII will all get in there eventually but it's fun to see who picks them, what their argument is and whether the group votes for them that time. But I think we're taking this a bit too seriously, it's just a fun little idea Kyle came up with, not some big official thing.
To be fair, the Hall of Fame was established in 1939 and they only JUST inducted Mike Piazza, who retired at the end of the 2007 season. He was eligible a few times since then. It happens.
Also, to correct Kyle, Pete Rose is NOT in the Baseball Hall of Fame. He's in the Cincinnati Reds Hall of Fame.
Hah, i'm certainly taking it more seriously than it needs to be, i'll admit that.
Baseball has been around longer than videogames is true, but videogames have an insanely deep rich history as well. Plenty to draw from. The modern day baseball Hall of Fame (and most other sports Halls of Fame) mostly are inducting very recently eligible players or those that weren't shoe-ins. All of the old "greats" are already in. Also, I think Kyle mentioned this process was similar to how the NFL does their HoF(?), I'm not familiar with it being a Detroit Lions fan.
As to Don's vote, it was just nominated but didn't come close to getting in, which seems like the system worked if you didn't think it was a "great." Fun to get a different perspective, though.
I just think there's easily 12-18 games that are undeniably "great" and that means we're 2-3 years from getting into what I feel are the more interesting debates.
I have absolutely no clue who any of those baseball players are but I think comparing the two is a bit silly because 1. Baseball has a far longer history than videogames, so I'm guessing even with all the people already in it, there's still tons of players you could go back and comfortably induct and 2. the MLB Hall of Fame is presumably voted on by a shitload more than 9 (or 6) people, so any left field picks (like Don has for AC4) are drowned out.
I don't really think having a giant backlog of greats is a bad thing. Sure, Mario 3, OoT and FFVII will all get in there eventually but it's fun to see who picks them, what their argument is and whether the group votes for them that time. But I think we're taking this a bit too seriously, it's just a fun little idea Kyle came up with, not some big official thing.
I haven't watched Frame Trap yet (and might not till tomorrow, I want to start my RE7 Madhouse playthrough once I get home) but Persona 5, Mario Odyssey and Red Dead Redemption 2, son.
Besides, excluding Link Between Worlds (which by all accounts I've heard is an incredible Zelda game), what was the last Zelda that didn't have a post-release backlash anyway?
ALBW is definitely overrated, the way item system works in particular is totally broken. I think I liked Phantom Hourglass more. There you go.
ALBW is definitely overrated, the way item system works in particular is totally broken. I think I liked Phantom Hourglass more. There you go.
ALBW is a fine game, its a bad Zelda game. The dungeons are so straightforward because they rely on a singular item, rather than the combination of items. It never builds on itself, which is a shame.
ALBW is a fine game, its a bad Zelda game.
The dungeons are so straightforward because they rely on a singular item, rather than the combination of items. It never builds on itself, which is a shame.
what... what???
no...
no...
no.... no...
oh no... no no no...
They did it
!
Thats my opinion. I think Zelda's strength is when you get to use the items together to solve a puzzle. There is none of that in ALBW. The structure of the game prevents it.
I always know which item will solve the puzzle, the one used to open the dungeon.
Most Zeldas
Get an item > Learn to use it > Master it > Get a new item > Learn to use it > Learn to use it with other item > Master it > Etc.
ALBW:
Get an item > Learn to use it > Master it > Never use it again
what... what???
no...
no...
no.... no...
oh no... no no no...
I do agree it is much better when zelda use the items for more than just 1 puzzle, but dismissing all the other qualities of it just because of the item usage feels so wrong to me.
then, of course I didn't mean my post, it was just a joke, it's ok if you don't like it, I just absolutely love ALBW over a lot of other zeldas because of the creativity of it, of the world and how it just evolved more the 2D zelda style that was basically abandoned after the GBA
You are right.I would agree that Spirit Tracks and Phantom Hourglass are the worst handheld Zeldas (and probably the worst Zelda games period) but A Link Between Worlds is a very close third. It's nowhere near as a great as Link's Awakening, Oracle Ages, Oracle Seasons, or even The Minish Cap. The item system sucks the fun out of dungeons.
is the prove it ticket dead?
Those handheld hd camcorders aren't going to cut it as their main production camera. It's kind of a sidegrade to even their really old Sony EX1.
They'll have to invest in something better, if y'all need some guidance on that let me know. I got some camera connections in Los Angeles.
A quality camera will totally increase their production values alone IMO.
L&R
ALBW is one of the worst Zelda games i've ever played amd one massive disappointment.
I dont get hyperbolic statements like this.
What exactly did they get?
Nothing hyperbolic about that, it's not like i wrote it as a bait.
Simply if i make a list of my fav Zelda games, this one sits at the bottom because i hardly liked it.
And a massive disappointment because i expected something more (what, i don't really know) when they said they wanted to take a fresh spin on the LttP formula.
I'm not sure on the exact Panasonic model, but Ian held up the box on this week's group stream. It seems fine enough for streams though. They'll just need to adjust color settings on the camera.
Has A Link Between Worlds finally reached the point in Zelda cycle, where it becomes popular to dislike the game (compared to the other Zelda games, at least)? It happened a lot faster for Twilight Princess and Skyward Sword.
For what it's worth, I don't think ALBW is amazing, but I think it's really good. I think it's in the better half of TLoZ games. The main problem I had with it was the recycled/remixed overworld.
Read what he actually wrote. Of Zelda games he/she played. And even than it is not far of a reach to assume he means mainline handheld/console Zeldas.Worse than the CD-i games? Worse than crossbow training? Triforce Heroes? 4 Swords?
Hyperbole is exactly what you used because I doubt you meant it like that, but if you actually do I take what I said back.
Actually read what he wrote. Of Zelda games he/she played.
Hah, i'm certainly taking it more seriously than it needs to be, i'll admit that.
Baseball has been around longer than videogames is true, but videogames have an insanely deep rich history as well. Plenty to draw from. The modern day baseball Hall of Fame (and most other sports Halls of Fame) mostly are inducting very recently eligible players or those that weren't shoe-ins. All of the old "greats" are already in. Also, I think Kyle mentioned this process was similar to how the NFL does their HoF(?), I'm not familiar with it being a Detroit Lions fan.
As to Don's vote, it was just nominated but didn't come close to getting in, which seems like the system worked if you didn't think it was a "great." Fun to get a different perspective, though.
I just think there's easily 12-18 games that are undeniably "great" and that means we're 2-3 years from getting into what I feel are the more interesting debates.
Re: Tabletop. Fun stuff but Huber's character is once again stalling the plot by going in loops like Law. No disrespect, but Im really tired about hearing about Moof.
It's pretty true to the character. Imagine if you died, wouldn't you do anything you could to bring yourself back?Re: Tabletop. Fun stuff but Huber's character is once again stalling the plot by going in loops like Law. No disrespect, but Im really tired about hearing about Moof.
It's pretty true to the character. Imagine if you died, wouldn't you do anything you could to bring yourself back?
Hey it's mishakoz in the flesh! Thanks for everything you do man!
I loved LBW by the way. I think I'm always more forgiving with handheld Zeldas though.
As someone who knows pretty much nothing about these games and hasn't seen any episodes would it be better to start with the gametrailers tabletop adventures or just start at the first episode of their most recent series?
As before, while I agree that Pomper certainly has Law-isms (always did, of course), it just makes Tabletop Escapades. I don't want his character to stop, but every now and again it comes to rattle in my head a bit. The inflection in some of his ridiculous responses alone are something I'd never trade away and are alone worth the price of admission.
good lawd skyward sword is insufferable
(watching brad stream)