Regulus Tera
Romanes Eunt Domus
Cep said:Choose!
I cannot. That would be hypocritical!
However, if I had to choose between S&P2 and SMG1, S&P2 by a nautical mile.
P.S. S&P2 is at least a 9.
Cep said:Choose!
I got goosebumps.That desire to experiment is this astonishing games most dangerous achievement. As the adventures soars onwards, its various spaces become increasingly warped, and the final levels switch the emphasis from perfecting the 3D platformer to deconstructing it. Mario is rubbing up against the limits of the form as much as the edge of the universe here, and youll see worlds where ledges hang sparse in the air, and where ghosts plucked from the entire sweep of videogame history emerge in half-familiar clumpings of cubes or a nimble arrangement of switches.
Marvel at the pieces, but appreciate the whole. This isnt a game that redefines the genre: this is one that rolls it up and locks it away. Weve come so far, from stepping on mushrooms to drop-kicking meteors into the heart of the sun; Galaxy 2 offers a new understanding of where weve been, a new sense of wonder at where well go next.
Regulus Tera said:Hey, haven't played SMG2 yet. I cannot answer that.
Though my heart is big enough to love them both.
Andrex said:Well EDGE seems to think it's at least 20% better.
<3
Andrex said:God I hope so. Then we might actually get some quality GIFs of the damn thing instead of screencapped ones like with SMG1...
Regulus Tera said:EDGE is at least 1/9 wrong.
something something review scores something something
Also, is it me or is SMG2 slowly becoming the Uncharted 2 of the Wii? Meaning the game everyone points out as holy grail of their system of choice.
Vinterbird said:The "sucky review bullshit" is very common and I really don't get why media needs to highlight it in special cases like GTA4, when it happens to a lot of AAA games that release. But I guess it's a good story, and cannon fodder for the "GTA4 overrated" crowd.
Gully State said:What? so it's quite common for reviewers to have to actually go to a developer's office to review a game with PR standing behind them? B/c I was always under the assumption that review copies just get mailed to the press and they play through them without any outside influences..
That would be the first SMG. This is holy grail pt2.Regulus Tera said:EDGE is at least 1/9 wrong.
something something review scores something something
Also, is it me or is SMG2 slowly becoming the Uncharted 2 of the Wii? Meaning the game everyone points out as holy grail of their system of choice.
darkwings said:wowo galaxy 2!
alan awake could be a disappointment after all these years in development
AniHawk said:Hopefully the fans behind SMG2 act a little more tactfully to criticism of that game.
hamchan said:That would be the first SMG. This is holy grail pt2.
Gravijah said:You are the IGN of GAF posters.
Regulus Tera said:Pretty sure PS3 fans treated Uncharted 1 the same way.
jakonovski said:The way Edge reviews games, a 10 always makes me feel that they're full of shit (or money).
It's like, "hey we have this really strict review paradigm, but here's this hugely marketed game of money hats everywhere and we're completely uncritical of it and love it unconditionally!"
Edge had a shift a few years ago. The whole 10 is revolutionary thing got shitcanned because the golden age of 3D being new to the medium is over. It's unfair to expect the same of Gran Turismo, Mario 64 et al of today's games. So they adjusted to make 10 more achievable.jakonovski said:The way Edge reviews games, a 10 always makes me feel that they're full of shit (or money).
It's like, "hey we have this really strict review paradigm, but here's this hugely marketed game of money hats everywhere and we're completely uncritical of it and love it unconditionally!"
You best start your own magazine and award scores the way you think then.Big Ass Ramp said:I feel the same way. All these great games getting 7s and 8s, then all of the sudden a super-hyped game gets a 10 when it feels like if it weren't for the hype, it could have easily been in with the 7s and 8s.
Or maybe SMG 2 is just as fantastic as SMG was.jakonovski said:The way Edge reviews games, a 10 always makes me feel that they're full of shit (or money).
It's like, "hey we have this really strict review paradigm, but here's this hugely marketed game of money hats everywhere and we're completely uncritical of it and love it unconditionally!"
DennisK4 said:Or maybe SMG 2 is just as fantastic as SMG was.
jakonovski said:Could be, just as it could be that many of the games they pan are being panned for effect. Point being, the whole publication feels like a huge troll.
zoukka said:Or maybe u one of them sensitive people who take videogame reviews as personal insults.
jakonovski said:No, I'm just commenting on a magazine. Some things you like, some you don't.
Oh I see. It's nice to meet you too.Tears For Fears said:LOL, people still take this magazine seriously. It's the IGN of print.
How can you criricise a perfect game!AniHawk said:Hopefully the fans behind SMG2 act a little more tactfully to criticism of that game.
So because one publication uses bigger scale than the usual 7-10 (with scores below 7 being reserved for only the worst games) it feels like a troll, right?Could be, just as it could be that many of the games they pan are being panned for effect. Point being, the whole publication feels like a huge troll.
zoukka said:Your constructive criticism; "the whole publication feels like a huge troll" already speaks for itself.
A 10 does not mean that the game is perfect...CassSept said:How can you criricise a perfect game!
jakonovski said:Could be, just as it could be that many of the games they pan are being panned for effect. Point being, the whole publication feels like a huge troll.
jakonovski said:The way Edge reviews games, a 10 always makes me feel that they're full of shit (or money).
It's like, "hey we have this really strict review paradigm, but here's this hugely marketed game of money hats everywhere and we're completely uncritical of it and love it unconditionally!"
jakonovski said:The way Edge reviews games, a 10 always makes me feel that they're full of shit (or money).
It's like, "hey we have this really strict review paradigm, but here's this hugely marketed game of money hats everywhere and we're completely uncritical of it and love it unconditionally!"
jakonovski said:It is a rather funny juxtaposition to make about Edge, their tens are all stereotypical big buck AAA releases, while they're supposed to be the magazine that dares to be different. I'd feel a whole lot better about their journalistic cojones if they dared to give tens to something less known, maybe even indie.
jakonovski said:It is a rather funny juxtaposition to make about Edge, their tens are all stereotypical big buck AAA releases, while they're supposed to be the magazine that dares to be different. I'd feel a whole lot better about their journalistic cojones if they dared to give tens to something less known, maybe even indie.
StuBurns said:If you mean is it more of a subjective opinion than a product review, I'd say more so than most, but not entirely.
As for British bias, such bullshit, is it so hard to believe that English people might see more appeal to something that is made by British people who have similar tastes and senses of humor etc? There is something very distinctly British about games like LBP, GTA, Fable etc, something that could easily be missed by people outside of the country. Of course this should be reflected in reviews. Is an Englishman likely to react the same way to something like Dances with Wolves as an American? Of course not. People don't highlight an American bias in all American press for everything that is American, because it is not a bias, it is a case of media input and influence on the reviewers life.
Gully State said:After reading about how Rockstar handled the GTAIV review (making reviewers play in a room with Rockstar PR watching/commenting), I'm not even going to bother with RDR reviews.
Remember that this is Edge. Other sites/publications use only 7-10 scale, and rarely go under that (save for truly godawful games). 7 from Edge means it is a good game, really. If anything, this means that you should still be interested in Alan Wake.Aspiring said:That Alan Wake score scares me. I mean, i went from not giving a shit, to seeing the trailers, to being so pumped up, but now this and a few scores scare me. Still i will judge from myself because from the videos and such i have seen it looks amazing.