Fimbulvetr
Member
Big Ass Ramp said:Did you see the Joystiq "review"?
Trick question? :lol
Big Ass Ramp said:Did you see the Joystiq "review"?
What Did I Do To Deserve This, My Lord!? 2
Baiano19 said:That's an awesome name and it got an awesome score...
Since when? Last time I saw the page it was $59.99.~Kinggi~ said:holy crap, so split second is 45$ new on preorder at amazon for the 360 AND you get 10 game credit. Glad i decided to preorder right now!
Green Scar said:Psst- they gave Mega Mans 9 and 10 the same score. These weirdos are blind to nostalgia![]()
360 only. Check again.burgerdog said:Since when? Last time I saw the page it was $59.99.
TheThunder said:no 10/10 for RDR :lol ?
Great, thank you, sir. So RDR, Alan Wake, and now Split/Second on the 18th.~Kinggi~ said:360 only. Check again.
If you mean is it more of a subjective opinion than a product review, I'd say more so than most, but not entirely.Linkified said:Its not made in the UK though :lol
But doesn't Edge review games move moview review than technical review?
StuBurns said:If you mean is it more of a subjective opinion than a product review, I'd say more so than most, but not entirely.
As for British bias, such bullshit, is it so hard to believe that English people might see more appeal to something that is made by British people who have similar tastes and senses of humor etc? There is something very distinctly British about games like LBP, GTA, Fable etc, something that could easily be missed by people outside of the country. Of course this should be reflected in reviews. Is an Englishman likely to react the same way to something like Dances with Wolves as an American? Of course not. People don't highlight an American bias in all American press for everything that is American, because it is not a bias, it is a case of media input and influence on the reviewers life.
It's too much to debate without a major derail I don't want to cause, but a lot. It's very much America as perceived by an Englishman. That's not to say it's the case in all English games at all though, the three I mentioned are very English to me as is something like Heavenly Sword, but something like Burnout Paradise or Motorstorm aren't very English to me at all.Death Dealer said:What's distinctly British about GTA ?
Death Dealer said:What's distinctly British about GTA ?
Cow Mengde said:I hope someone will make a Grand Soccer Game Riot for Edge to give a 10/10 to.
Is it that way this time though? Rockstar could afford to be as bullish as they wanted with GTA4 because it was always going to be an insane hit, regardless of quality, that's not the case with RDR, it's not an established IP.Gully State said:After reading about how Rockstar handled the GTAIV review (making reviewers play in a room with Rockstar PR watching/commenting), I'm not even going to bother with RDR reviews.
CaseyTappy said:Well , here it is .
Mario is GOD ...................again !
What is this? I don't evenLinkified said:Its not made in the UK though :lol
But doesn't Edge review games move moview review than technical review?
Interesting. Perhaps you should compare some non-English games as well for context, considering Edge generally are thought of to give lower review scores than most.StuBurns said:Is it that way this time though? Rockstar could afford to be as bullish as they wanted with GTA4 because it was always going to be an insane hit, regardless of quality, that's not the case with RDR, it's not an established IP.
KP did the same shit with MGS4, I wonder how common that crap is.
EDIT: Been doing some research, I don't even think Edge is scoring British games that high:
Haze got a 5/10 which is 5% lower than the Metacritic score
Heavenly Sword got 6/10, 19% lower than on Metacritic
Fable 2 got 9/10, 1% higher than on Metacritic
Burnout Paradise got 9/10 2% higher than on Metacritic
Batman AA got 8/10, 11% lower than on Metacritic
Yeah, I had a look at some of that, their scores are strange for everything often, strangely higher, sometimes lower. It's hard to pick random games to check. If you consider their 10 scores, I'd say a higher percentage are British than there should be considering how prolific British developers are, but that is in keeping with most publications I believe. GTA4 and LBP for example got great scores from pretty much everywhere.Rustymonke said:Interesting. Perhaps you should compare some non-English games as well for context, considering Edge generally are thought of to give lower review scores than most.
I should know better than to shake this particular tree, but how so?Tears For Fears said:LOL, people still take this magazine seriously. It's the IGN of print.
dragonflys545 said:Going to pick up SMG1+2 when i pick up a Wii.
FTFYtimetokill said:Super Mario Galaxy 2 10
Cave Story 8
WarioWare: D.I.Y. 8
Sin and Punishment - 8
Hell of a month for Nintendo. Lots of great games to choose from right now. and of course, TWO incredible must-haves.
wind_steaker said:thats a great score for Split/Second, better than I expected after the demo.
Tears For Fears said:LOL, people still take this magazine seriously. It's the IGN of print.
StuBurns said:Is it that way this time though? Rockstar could afford to be as bullish as they wanted with GTA4 because it was always going to be an insane hit, regardless of quality, that's not the case with RDR, it's not an established IP.
Major bullshit if true. Although, I'm not sure PR are actually the people who decide when the press get review material and under what circumstances they have to play it. I've heard terrible things about gaming PR, mostly relating to them not actually knowing all that much about the product in hand. The quotes do imply the product is shit, and they therefore need to pressure people into being scared of slagging it off, but I very much doubt RDR's quality being poor. This isn't nearly as bad as some of Ubisoft's bullshit, or even worse Konami's MGS4 review rules. But still, it's very bad form all round.Gully State said:Well so far the actions of their PR haven't exactly indicated otherwise
StuBurns said:Major bullshit if true. Although, I'm not sure PR are actually the people who decide when the press get review material and under what circumstances they have to play it. I've heard terrible things about gaming PR, mostly relating to them not actually knowing all that much about the product in hand. The quotes do imply the product is shit, and they therefore need to pressure people into being scared of slagging it off, but I very much doubt RDR's quality being poor. This isn't nearly as bad as some of Ubisoft's bullshit, or even worse Konami's MGS4 review rules. But still, it's very bad form all round.
Rustymonke, who is in your avatar, looks like Joanna Newsom in the MGMT video.
Tears For Fears said:LOL, people still take this magazine seriously. It's the IGN of print.
Tears For Fears said:LOL, people still take this magazine seriously. It's the IGN of print.
Tears For Fears said:LOL, people still take this magazine seriously. It's the IGN of print.
did he blow you away?Gravijah said:You are the IGN of GAF posters.
ShockingAlberto said:I should know better than to shake this particular tree, but how so?
Andrex said:So basically, SMG2 > S&P2, like I said.Don't hurt me.
Choose!Regulus Tera said:Hey, haven't played SMG2 yet. I cannot answer that.
Though my heart is big enough to love them both.
Vampire Baseball said:In this thread - Games people haven't played aren't getting the 10's people expected. Shocker. :lol