LiveWire said:
It doesn't necessarily make Tiki look any better (covering your own ass after your team makes the SuperBowl the year after you retire, sour grapes much?), but it's very interesting to see how Coughlin handled it (read: not well). It makes it more apparent that this year's success came more from Spagnuolo, Reese, and Gilbride than from Coughlin.
LiveWire said:
I know, but when I look at Coughlin I see a guy who's succeeding despite himself. I can't be the only one that has that impression. I mean, if the Giants lose the SB, Coughlin's really no better than Jim Fassel--and ask any Giants fan what they think of him.
That is absurd.
The Giants have started 5-2 every single year since Coughlin has been our coach. Since 2005 (Eli's first year starting), the Giants have consistently had a top offense. The only thing that has kept the Giants from going to the next level is the defense, as I have said on this very forum many times. Suddenly Spagnuolo does a decent (not great) job of using the tools provided to him, two pro bowl DEs, a budding star in Tuck, three press corners, competent LBs and all of a sudden he's the hero? No one mentions that the Giants have beaten their opponents in penalty margin by a vast amount in the post-season or or that the special teams has turned it up a notch since the move was made to take Droughns out of the returning role. Further, no one has mentioned that the Giants have had a lot of injuries this year and each backup has stepped up to fill in so admirably that the team does not miss a step. Each of those is a hallmark of good coaching, all of those are things that Coughlin had preached since he got here.
Last I checked, he did an amazing job with the Jaguars right out of the gate. If not for the Titans they could have been mentioned in the same breath with these 19-0 Pats. No one remembers the good stuff though.
----------------------------------------
About the game on Sunday, I think the biggest key is that the Giants have to be the more physical team on the field.
The Giants just beat two teams that are considered 'Finesse Teams' and the Pats are yet another one of the same breed. The way they did it was they came out firing on both sides of the ball. Lots of smash mouth running (sticking with it even if it doesn't work), lots of press coverage, lots of explosive bull-rushing from our DLine and OLine is what I remember from the last two games.
Establish that it's going to be the last team standing, not who can run faster. It's going to be very important to pound our RBs on those older NE linebackers, be it with the run or with dump offs/swings/screens/shovel passes. Make them not want to play anymore, just like we did to the Packers entire O, and the Dallas OLine.
Looking back on the playoff run, the Giants have been the more physical team the entire time except for:
1) The first quarter against TB in which both TB lines were playing out of their minds, IMO.
2) The first 28:30 of the Dallas game where they decided to just pound the crap out of us with the run.
Frankly, if the Giants have
anything going for them in this game it's that they can literally just bully the Pats on both sides of the ball. Just look at Plax last week versus Al Harris, complete domination. The one and only matchup I am worried about is Randy Moss versus either Madison or Webster (whoever is on him). If Butler is over top we are toast.