lunarworks said:
BRD playback licensing is a "bag of hurt", as Jobs said.
Remember how Samsung almost successfully tried to get an injunction against all of Sony's PS3 sales in Europe earlier this year, temporarily halting shipments, due to Blu-ray functionality? With all the bitter disputes going on in the mobile area, that's just one more minefield that Apple doesn't want to tread on.
Not that I wouldn't LOVE to have Blu-ray in my Mac, I would, but I can see his point of view. They weighed the benefits and the drawbacks, and decided to leave it out. I guess I'll just save my Blu-rays for my big screen in the living room, where the level of detail has more benefits.
lol - can't let this one go. If you're going to troll, at least pick something remotely defensible.
- The lawsuit was specific to PS3 and to the Netherlands. It was not all of Europe. In reality it was a lame tit for tat as a response to a cellphone lawsuit Sony brought up against LG. There is no indication it was ever applicable to BD's for anything else.
- The ban has been lifted and LG is now liable for substantial damages. It isn't over yet, but regardless there's no indication it's related to anything but PS3 (and it probably won't go anywhere anyway).
The Reality
There aren't any issues making licensing 'a bag of hurt' ... LG's move was simply corporate posturing in retaliation to a previous Sony suit ... and Apple's comments were simply propaganda to deflect criticism for their business decision.
There have been tens of millions of BD players sold, drives built into computers, and sold externally. No problems. Moreover, did companies stop making computers with BD-ROM's or selling standalones after this occurred? No, because they aren't worried.
Hell, I have a media streamer (Popcorn Hour C-200) that can not only play BD's if you add an internal drive ... it plays BD's with full menus from external HDD's and even network drives/servers. All of this legally and fully licensed. It's not the only media streamer to offer this.
There are no serious concerns regarding licensing.
Real Talk
Apple has always positioned Macintosh as the best place to go for media/content creation and playback. It's basically the legacy they've lived off of and continue to propagate since its inception.
In reality, they were working on BD playback. Hell, they're part of the
Board of Directors for the BluRay Disc Associationhttp://www.apple.com/pr/library/200...Welcomes-Apple-to-Its-Board-of-Directors.html.
However, Jobs was hedging his bets. He decided to hold off release in order to see how things went with their iTunes movie and TV DD endeavor. Obviously the decision was that they hit a tipping point, and that supporting consumer
playback would be a conflict of interests since it could negatively effect their DD offering that was proving quite successful.
Hell Macintosh can actually be used for BD authoring. And why not, it serves to continue its legacy for media/content creation. What you won't see however is support for consumer playback built into the OS or Apple media players. Why? Because it is in their best interest to
not support it.
I get that there are plenty of posters that come in and troll
anything Apple does as automatically being terrible for consumers. Yeah, it's lame. However doing the opposite and pretending everything they do is for the benefit of consumers is just as bad. The reality is BD playback didn't happen because it's better for Apple, not because it's better for us. Had iTunes's movie and TV offerings not taken off, it's
very likely Apple would have BD playback in there right now. Because at that point, it would have been in their interests to have the bullet point as the final destination for all things media related.