Mgoblue201
Won't stop picking the right nation
One does not simply walk into Anatolia.
One does not simply walk into Anatolia.
Uzzy 4.5 rating, right after Jazz.
Dat recovery.
The Ottomans do need to die though because they're defender of the faith and I'm surrounded by Sunnis.
Oh boy, I just realized I can't play next Sunday. Let's hope that the AI doesn't do aything stupid like declaring on Novgorod or Brandenburg, that would really screw up my plans (and my recently recovered manpower).
I'll need to find a way to play on Sunday haha, I can't risk the AI going a wildly different way than what I've planned.
Oh boy, I just realized I can't play next Sunday. Let's hope that the AI doesn't do aything stupid like declaring on Novgorod or Brandenburg, that would really screw up my plans (and my recently recovered manpower).
Bought Victoria II and all DLC for pocket change. Gotta love steam sales!
My computer is fixed to the point I can probably sit in for people on other days, but not that specific one as I will be away. Apologies.
Also, Roboleon, you now have the best Paradox game! Congratulations on your discerning taste, and remember: real men form Poland-Lithuania from Krakow.
I just grabbed it, thanks to your post.
Now we can try to figure out how Vicky 2 works together!
Vicky 2 is the most realistic Paradox game.Oh, and the entire world economy runs on alcohol. Corner the liquor and wine markets and you will be rich as fuck.
Is there another session planned before Christmas?
No, current session wont end before end of febuary I think, of course if it ends earlier we will Contact all intrested.
Yeah, but whenever we actually start a new one, it'll be 2015 for sure, even if it were to end within a few sessions.
Also, keep in mind after we end this session (and future sessions) we will conduct a rating of each player as you see it. It would be good if every player could give a pro and cons with their performance, e.g for me, strong would be taking over and form Great Britain, while a con would be the major fuck up I did during the KingSnake gate.
Also, keep in mind after we end this session (and future sessions) we will conduct a rating of each player as you see it. It would be good if every player could give a pro and cons with their performance, e.g for me, strong would be taking over and form Great Britain, while a con would be the major fuck up I did during the KingSnake gate.
Aren't player ratings given anonomously? Or do you mean that we should give our own pros and cons afterwards?
You're getting a 5/5 Machiavelli style.
if Fanboi is Macchiavelli and Jazz is von Clausewitz; who's Sun Tzu?
MGO
Kab, obviously. A very good theoretician.
I guess I am Gandhi then. At least the Gandhi in Civ4 tend to have my peaceul ways mastered,
And worthless practitioner?
Hearts of Iron 3 is the Paradox game for real lunatics. That supply network and OOB stuff, bloody hell. Took me 40 hours just to figure all that out. Still, the next two hundred hours spent conquering the world/saving the world were pretty fun.
I find HoI3's learning curve really strange. You spend ~50 hours having no idea what is going on, ~10 hours at a point where the Ai poses a challenge, and after that the game is just a walkover.
Yeah, it's disappointing in that aspect. Mods improve the situation but don't solve it.
Sadly because of the nature of the game, it's really hard to do a lot with one of the smaller nations. Sure, you can get some challenge out of playing Canada, Australia or Hungary, but there's pretty hard limits to what you can do with them.
Someone has a European conquest by Czechslovakia somewhere, I'll see if I can find a link to the AAR. Still, for the most part yeah, HoI as a series doesn't offer the same replay value as others. People have said Victoria suffers from the sake problem, but I disagree - even more if your territorial expansion is difficult, the industrial process is amazing and can be a whole game in itself.
You guys all know that when V3 is released, I wont stop nagging until we play an MP session, right?