No they took game assets and messed with them
Heh, makes sense. It looked like I was just watchinv Vita game footage. lol
----
So because this is basically annual WW2 week, I was re-watching a series about the USS Enterprise (called Battle 360) and I remembered that last year, there was a movie in Japan that was released called
Eien no Zero.
The movie ended up being the biggest domestic release in Japan for the year (beaten out by Frozen!), and is a basically a look at the psychology of kamikaze pilots and one man's attempts to challenge the assumption that needlessly sacrificing your life for your country in a suicide mission is the best way to serve with distinction.
It's interesting, because in a lot of WW2 stories told from the Allied perspective, soldiers will often talk about survivor's guilt and wonder why they were the ones who survived when their friends, standing right next to them, end up being hit by a bullet or by shrapnel.
Meanwhile, the soldiers in Eien no Zero directly accuse survivors of cowardice, because if you don't die in battle, presumably you put your own self-interest over that of the nation-state.
Anyway, while I found the movie itself an interesting artifact, what caught my eye the most is this quote from Miyazaki about the movie:
Animation maestro Hayao Miyazaki, whose WWII-themed feature “Kaze Tachinu (The Winds Rises)” took as its hero Zero fighter-plane designer Jiro Horikoshi, also had harsh words to say about the film in an interview: “They’re trying to make a Zero fighter story based on a fictional war account that is a pack of lies,” he said. “They’re just continuing a phony myth, saying, ‘Take pride in the Zero fighter.’ I’ve hated that sort of thing ever since I was a kid.”
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/culture...es-over-abe-endorsed-wwii-drama/#.VGP6-YfB-h5
It raises a couple points for me of course. Apparently there is a tradition of glorifying the exploits of the kamikaze pilot in Japanese fiction... which probably makes sense, since it's probably the one true vestige of WW2 that the Japanese might claim as their own without any of the more "problematic" aspects of their combat operations ruining an otherwise nationalistic narrative.
But more relevant for a discussion here is that it explains why
Kaze Tachinu was so decidedly apolitical and avoided taking any ownership of Jiro's role in creating the Zero fighter in the first place.
It's interesting that he accuses Eien no Zero of being "a pack of lies", considering his own film is a complete fictionalization, but given what I understand of Miyazaki's stance on Japanese nationalism and how he views WW2, it's clear that he's resisting the impulse to glorify the acts of soldiers and pilots in the war than he is the act of fictionalizing history itself.
I almost wonder if Miyazaki had seen the movie before he gave that quote though, because the film itself is decidedly anti-war and almost condemns a whole generation of Japanese men who believed that throwing your life away for emperor was the only way to live a full life.
The one interesting part about all of this is that the movie did well enough that there is going to be a TV adaptation of the film/the novel that the film is based on next year. If nothing else, there is clearly an appetite in Japan to see more stories WW2... but I'll leave a sociologist to ponder the world's obsession with the last "great" war.
Incidentally, this is also related to anime in that the director of the film, Takashi Yamazaki, is a dude who does anime film adaptations. He did the live action
Yamato 2199 adaptation a few years back, he recently did a
Doraemon movie, and he is going to be adapting
Parasyte into a two film duology.